World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 62 2965 1453 153 11352

John R. Hind publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John R. Hind between 1995 and 2015, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John R. Hind published across 21 years, from 1995 to 2015, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2001. 2 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2015. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2001. 1995: 5 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 28 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication
1995 2015

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John R. Hind: publications per year, 1995 to 2015
Year Publications
1995 5
1996 0
1997 0
1998 5
1999 14
2000 18
2001 28
2002 11
2003 18
2004 6
2005 8
2006 7
2007 18
2008 3
2009 6
2010 2
2011 8
2012 7
2013 0
2014 1
2015 1
Total 166
Download as CSV

John R. Hind publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Hind sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 153 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559 153
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

John R. Hind D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Hind sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308 62
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • The Internet

His primary scientific interests are in Computer security, Computer program, Database, Public-key cryptography and XSL. His work on Authentication, Open Smart Card Development Platform, Contactless smart card and Smart card as part of general Computer security research is frequently linked to MULTOS, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. The concepts of his Computer program study are interwoven with issues in Ubiquitous computing, Database transaction, Embedded system, Scheme and Product.

His Database research is multidisciplinary, relying on both XML and Client. His Public-key cryptography research integrates issues from Wireless, Identifier and Server. The study incorporates disciplines such as Style sheet language, Style sheet, Document type definition and Semantics in addition to XSL.

His most cited work include:

  • Security containers for document components (263 citations)
  • Methods, systems and computer program products for secure firmware updates (256 citations)
  • Method and apparatus for exclusively pairing wireless devices (245 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

John R. Hind mainly investigates Database, World Wide Web, Computer program, Computer security and Computer network. His Database research includes elements of Process, Unique identifier, Style sheet, XML and Information retrieval. His work on Session and Social network as part of general World Wide Web study is frequently linked to Product and Electronic mail, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.

His Computer program research includes themes of Container, Server and Component. His study in Computer security is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Identifier, Database transaction and Product. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Wireless network and Distributed computing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Database (25.00%)
  • World Wide Web (24.34%)
  • Computer program (21.05%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2015)?

  • World Wide Web (24.34%)
  • Social network (2.63%)
  • Computer program (21.05%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

World Wide Web, Social network, Computer program, Object and Mashup are his primary areas of study. In general World Wide Web, his work in Session is often linked to Electronic mail and Notice linking many areas of study. John R. Hind combines topics linked to Declaration with his work on Computer program.

His study on Mashup also encompasses disciplines like

  • Event and related Set,
  • Cache and related Database. In his works, John R. Hind performs multidisciplinary study on Database and Current user. Borrowing concepts from Computer security, he weaves in ideas under Resource location.

Between 2008 and 2015, his most popular works were:

  • Obscuring form data through obfuscation (58 citations)
  • Url-based sticky routing tokens using a server-side cookie jar (57 citations)
  • Visualizing emotions and mood in a collaborative social networking environment (33 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • The Internet

John R. Hind mainly focuses on World Wide Web, Resource location, Information retrieval, Notice and Mood. John R. Hind studies Mashup which is a part of World Wide Web. Resource location is integrated with Computer security, Obfuscation, Encryption, Reversing and String in his study.

John R. Hind combines subjects such as Error detection code, Theoretical computer science, Uniform resource locator, Path and Checksum with his study of Information retrieval. He integrates many fields, such as Mood and State, in his works.

Best Publications

  • Methods, systems and computer program products for secure firmware updates

    John R. Hind;Marcia Lambert Peters

  • Method and apparatus for exclusively pairing wireless devices

    John Raithel Hind;Marcia Lambert Peters

  • Methods, systems and computer program products for detecting a spoofed source address in IP datagrams

    Ronald P. Doyle;John R. Hind;Thomas Narten;Marcia L. Peters

  • Secure integrated device with secure, dynamically-selectable capabilities

    Ronald P. Doyle;John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters

  • Method for producing composite XML document object model trees using dynamic data retrievals

    Charles Burkett;John Raithel Hind;David Bruce Lection;Richard Dean Telford

  • Smart card with integrated biometric sensor

    Ronald Doyle;John Hind;Marcia Peters

  • Security containers for document components

    Ronald P. Doyle;John R. Hind;Marcia L. Stockton

  • Selective data encryption using style sheet processing

    Mark C. Davis;John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters;Brad B. Topol

  • Technique for continuous user authentication

    Ronald Doyle;John Hind;Marcia Peters

  • Method and system for providing targeted advertising and personalized customer services

    John Hind;James Mathewson;Marcia Peters

  • Using device certificates for automated authentication of communicating devices

    John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters

  • Using device certificates to authenticate servers before automatic address assignment

    John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters

  • Enhanced transcoding of structured documents through use of annotation techniques

    Kathryn Britton;Roderick Henderson;John Hind;Steven Ims

  • Identification and tracking of persons using RFID-tagged items in store environments

    John R. Hind;M. Mathewson Ii James;Marcia L. Peters

  • Clickstream data collection technique

    John R. Hind;Binh Q. Nguyen;Marcia L. Peters

  • Method and apparatus for efficiently initializing secure communications among wireless devices

    John Raithel Hind;Marcia Lambert Peters

  • Selective data encryption using style sheet processing for decryption by a client proxy

    John R. Hind;Marcia L. Peters;Brad B. Topol

  • Method to address security and privacy issues of the use of RFID systems to track consumer products

    John R. Hind;II James M. Mathewson;Marcia L. Peters

  • Method and apparatus for client authentication and application configuration via smart cards

    Ronald Patrick Doyle;John Raithel Hind;Julie Hayes King

  • Retrieval of style sheets from directories based upon partial characteristic matching

    John R. Hind;David Bruce Lection;Douglas Tidwell Ii Leonard;Brad B. Topol

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcia L. Peters
Marcia L. Peters IBM (United States)
Ronald P. Doyle
Ronald P. Doyle Broadcom (United States)
Ajamu A. Wesley
Ajamu A. Wesley IBM (United States)
David B. Lection
David B. Lection IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees in computer science and beyond can greatly expand your career options. Many students benefit from pursuing degrees through cheap online colleges, making education more accessible and cost-effective.

If academic records are a concern, consider online colleges that accept low gpa. These schools provide flexible routes to a technology career, even if your GPA isn’t as high as you’d like.

For those interested in intersecting fields, an environmental science background can be valuable. Learn more about diverse tech roles with an environmental science degree. Such knowledge is increasingly significant in fields like data science or sustainability tech.

Accelerate your professional journey with an accelerated computer science degree online. These programs are designed for motivated learners who want to enter the workforce quickly, often in high-growth digital fields.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Hind

Recently Published Articles