World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc Auriacombe

Marc Auriacombe

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
8437
World Ranking
4977
National Ranking
54

Marc Auriacombe publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Auriacombe sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Marc Auriacombe D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Auriacombe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Auriacombe is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France. Their research primarily spans medicine and psychology, with a significant focus on epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and public health, environmental and occupational health. The scientist's work engages deeply with topics related to substance abuse treatment and outcomes, mental health research, opioid use disorder treatment, HIV and drug use and sexual risk, functional brain connectivity studies, digital mental health interventions, and schizophrenia research and treatment.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Marc Auriacombe include:

  • The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data (2023) - Psychological Bulletin
  • Trust and acceptance of a virtual psychiatric interview between embodied conversational agents and outpatients (2020) - npj Digital Medicine
  • Stigmatization of people with addiction by health professionals: Current knowledge. A scoping review (2023) - Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
  • Smartphone-Based Virtual Agents to Help Individuals With Sleep Concerns During COVID-19 Confinement: Feasibility Study (2020) - Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Impact of drug consumption rooms on non-fatal overdoses, abscesses and emergency department visits in people who inject drugs in France: results from the COSINUS cohort (2022) - International Journal of Epidemiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Auriacombe include:

  • Fuschia Serre
  • Mélina Fatseas
  • Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi
  • Pierre Philip
  • Étienne de Sevin

The scientist commonly publishes in the following venues:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • L Encéphale
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • BMJ Open
  • Translational Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • DSM-5 Criteria for Substance Use Disorders: Recommendations and Rationale

    Deborah S. Hasin;Charles P. O’Brien;Marc Auriacombe;Guilherme Borges

  • An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach

    Nancy M. Petry;Florian Rehbein;Douglas A. Gentile;Jeroen S. Lemmens

  • Ecological momentary assessment in the investigation of craving and substance use in daily life: a systematic review.

    Fuschia Serre;Melina Fatseas;Joel Swendsen;Marc Auriacombe

  • Variability in the prevalence of adult ADHD in treatment seeking substance use disorder patients: results from an international multi-center study exploring DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria

    Geurt van de Glind;Maija Konstenius;Maarten W.J. Koeter;Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen;Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen

  • Deaths Attributable to Methadone vs Buprenorphine in France

    Marc Auriacombe;Pascale Franques;Jean Tignol

  • Validity of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) as a screener for adult ADHD in treatment seeking substance use disorder patients

    Geurt Van de Glind;Wim van den Brink;Maarten W.J. Koeter;Pieter Jan Carpentier

  • An Overview of and Rationale for Changes Proposed for Pathological Gambling in DSM-5

    Nancy M. Petry;Carlos Blanco;Marc Auriacombe;Guilherme Borges

  • Psychiatric comorbidity in treatment-seeking substance use disorder patients with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: results of the IASP study

    Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen;Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen;Geurt van de Glind;Maarten W. J. Koeter;Steve Allsop

  • Effectiveness of therapeutic communities: a systematic review.

    Marion Malivert;Mélina Fatséas;Cécile Denis;Emmanuel Langlois

  • Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine mono-dependence management in outpatient settings.

    Cecile Denis;Melina Fatseas;Estelle Lavie;Marc Auriacombe

  • Body dysmorphic disorder in a sample of cosmetic surgery applicants.

    B. Aouizerate;H. Pujol;D. Grabot;M. Faytout

  • Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings

    Cecile Denis;Estelle Lavie;Melina Fatseas;Marc Auriacombe

  • Recommendations for buprenorphine and methadone therapy in opioid use disorder: a European consensus

    Maurice Dematteis;Marc Auriacombe;Oscar D'Agnone;Lorenzo Somaini

  • Craving and substance use among patients with alcohol, tobacco, cannabis or heroin addiction: a comparison of substance- and person-specific cues.

    Melina Fatseas;Fuschia Serre;Fuschia Serre;Jean-Marc Alexandre;Jean-Marc Alexandre;Romain Debrabant;Romain Debrabant

  • Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors and the Risk of Bleeding

    Robert M Weinrieb;Marc Auriacombe;Kevin G Lynch;James D Lewis

  • Benzodiazepine use among opiate-dependent subjects in buprenorphine maintenance treatment: correlates of use, abuse and dependence.

    Estelle Lavie;Mélina Fatséas;Cécile Denis;Marc Auriacombe

  • Ecological momentary assessment in alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and opiate dependence: a comparison of feasibility and validity.

    Fuschia Serre;Melina Fatseas;Romain Debrabant;Jean-Marc Alexandre

  • Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine mono-dependence management in outpatient settings (withdrawn review).

    Cecile Denis;Melina Fatseas;Estelle Lavie;Marc Auriacombe

  • Trust and acceptance of a virtual psychiatric interview between embodied conversational agents and outpatients.

    Pierre Philip;Pierre Philip;Lucile Dupuy;Lucile Dupuy;Marc Auriacombe;Marc Auriacombe;Fushia Serre;Fushia Serre

  • Predictors of craving and substance use among patients with alcohol, tobacco, cannabis or opiate addictions: Commonalities and specificities across substances

    Fuschia Serre;Melina Fatseas;Cécile Denis;Joel Swendsen

  • Cannabis et psychose : recherche d’un lien de causalité à partir d’une revue critique systématique de la littérature

    P.-Y. Le Bec;M. Fatséas;C. Denis;E. Lavie

  • Self-perceived motivation for benzodiazepine use and behavior related to benzodiazepine use among opiate-dependent patients.

    Mélina Fatséas;Estelle Lavie;Cécile Denis;Marc Auriacombe

  • Addiction and personality

    P Franques;M Auriacombe;J Tignol

  • A socio-structural approach to preventing injection drug use initiation: rationale for the PRIMER study

    Daniel Werb;Richard Garfein;Thomas Kerr;Peter Davidson

  • Mortality Associated With Time in and Out of Buprenorphine Treatment in French Office-Based General Practice: A 7-Year Cohort Study

    Julie Dupouy;Aurore Palmaro;Mélina Fatséas;Marc Auriacombe

  • Motivations for using electronic cigarettes in young adults: A systematic review.

    Shérazade Kinouani;Shérazade Kinouani;Chloé Leflot;Paul Vanderkam;Marc Auriacombe

  • Persistence and Subtype Stability of ADHD Among Substance Use Disorder Treatment Seekers.

    Sharlene Kaye;Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga;Geurt van de Glind;Frances R. Levin

  • Griffiths et al.'s comments on the international consensus statement of internet gaming disorder: furthering consensus or hindering progress?

    Nancy M. Petry;Florian Rehbein;Douglas A. Gentile;Jeroen S. Lemmens

  • The DSM-5 field trials and reliability of alcohol use disorder.

    Deborah S. Hasin;Marc Auriacombe;Guilherme Borges;Kathleen Bucholz

  • Non-medical use of prescription gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) in five european countries

    Francina Fonseca;William Lenahan;Richard C Dart;Esther Papaseit

  • Risk Factors for Borderline Personality Disorder in Treatment Seeking Patients with a Substance Use Disorder: An International Multicenter Study

    Manuela Wapp;Geurt Van De Glind;Geurt Van De Glind;Katelijne Van Emmerik-Van Oortmerssen;Geert Dom

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre Philip
Pierre Philip University of Bordeaux
Joel Swendsen
Joel Swendsen University of Bordeaux
Charles P. O'Brien
Charles P. O'Brien University of Pennsylvania
Maarten W. J. Koeter
Maarten W. J. Koeter University of Amsterdam
Geert Dom
Geert Dom University of Antwerp
Robert A. Schoevers
Robert A. Schoevers University Medical Center Groningen
Wim van den Brink
Wim van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Guilherme Borges
Guilherme Borges Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría
Sharlene Kaye
Sharlene Kaye University of New South Wales
Frances R. Levin
Frances R. Levin Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse online degree options tailored to multiple career goals. Students interested in mental health and human behavior can pursue affordable online masters in psychology, which provide cost-effective routes toward careers in counseling, therapy, or research.

For those already rooted in education, edd programs online offer flexible, accelerated learning while preparing candidates for leadership roles or specialized administrative positions. Fast-track online options can shorten the traditional degree timeline without sacrificing quality or accreditation standards.

Additionally, online master's degree programs allow students to quickly upskill within a year, ideal for those seeking career advancement or a career change in fields like sociology, communication, or political science. Similarly, undergraduates can benefit from online accelerated bachelor's degree offerings to fast-track their entry into the workforce or prepare for advanced study.

These flexible online pathways allow students to balance studies with work or personal commitments—making Social Sciences and Humanities education in the USA more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Auriacombe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles