World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc Auriacombe

Marc Auriacombe

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4977 4616 54 36 171 8437

Marc Auriacombe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc Auriacombe between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc Auriacombe published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2015. 34 of the 276 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2015. 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 14 publications
1990 2025

276 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc Auriacombe: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 3
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 4
1995 2
1996 3
1997 5
1998 3
1999 2
2000 5
2001 6
2002 2
2003 10
2004 7
2005 3
2006 6
2007 1
2008 4
2009 5
2010 4
2011 5
2012 8
2013 8
2014 19
2015 24
2016 12
2017 14
2018 10
2019 6
2020 7
2021 16
2022 18
2023 16
2024 20
2025 14
Total 276
Download as CSV

Marc Auriacombe publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Auriacombe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 171
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Marc Auriacombe D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Auriacombe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Marc Auriacombe is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France. Their research primarily spans medicine and psychology, with a significant focus on epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and public health, environmental and occupational health. The scientist's work engages deeply with topics related to substance abuse treatment and outcomes, mental health research, opioid use disorder treatment, HIV and drug use and sexual risk, functional brain connectivity studies, digital mental health interventions, and schizophrenia research and treatment.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Marc Auriacombe include:

  • The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data (2023) - Psychological Bulletin
  • Trust and acceptance of a virtual psychiatric interview between embodied conversational agents and outpatients (2020) - npj Digital Medicine
  • Stigmatization of people with addiction by health professionals: Current knowledge. A scoping review (2023) - Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
  • Smartphone-Based Virtual Agents to Help Individuals With Sleep Concerns During COVID-19 Confinement: Feasibility Study (2020) - Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Impact of drug consumption rooms on non-fatal overdoses, abscesses and emergency department visits in people who inject drugs in France: results from the COSINUS cohort (2022) - International Journal of Epidemiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Auriacombe include:

  • Fuschia Serre
  • Mélina Fatseas
  • Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi
  • Pierre Philip
  • Étienne de Sevin

The scientist commonly publishes in the following venues:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • L Encéphale
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • BMJ Open
  • Translational Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • DSM-5 Criteria for Substance Use Disorders: Recommendations and Rationale

    Deborah S. Hasin;Charles P. O’Brien;Marc Auriacombe;Guilherme Borges

  • An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach

    Nancy M. Petry;Florian Rehbein;Douglas A. Gentile;Jeroen S. Lemmens

  • Ecological momentary assessment in the investigation of craving and substance use in daily life: a systematic review.

    Fuschia Serre;Melina Fatseas;Joel Swendsen;Marc Auriacombe

  • Variability in the prevalence of adult ADHD in treatment seeking substance use disorder patients: results from an international multi-center study exploring DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria

    Geurt van de Glind;Maija Konstenius;Maarten W.J. Koeter;Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen;Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen

  • Deaths Attributable to Methadone vs Buprenorphine in France

    Marc Auriacombe;Pascale Franques;Jean Tignol

  • Validity of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) as a screener for adult ADHD in treatment seeking substance use disorder patients

    Geurt Van de Glind;Wim van den Brink;Maarten W.J. Koeter;Pieter Jan Carpentier

  • An Overview of and Rationale for Changes Proposed for Pathological Gambling in DSM-5

    Nancy M. Petry;Carlos Blanco;Marc Auriacombe;Guilherme Borges

  • Psychiatric comorbidity in treatment-seeking substance use disorder patients with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: results of the IASP study

    Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen;Katelijne van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen;Geurt van de Glind;Maarten W. J. Koeter;Steve Allsop

  • Effectiveness of therapeutic communities: a systematic review.

    Marion Malivert;Mélina Fatséas;Cécile Denis;Emmanuel Langlois

  • Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine mono-dependence management in outpatient settings.

    Cecile Denis;Melina Fatseas;Estelle Lavie;Marc Auriacombe

  • Body dysmorphic disorder in a sample of cosmetic surgery applicants.

    B. Aouizerate;H. Pujol;D. Grabot;M. Faytout

  • Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings

    Cecile Denis;Estelle Lavie;Melina Fatseas;Marc Auriacombe

  • Recommendations for buprenorphine and methadone therapy in opioid use disorder: a European consensus

    Maurice Dematteis;Marc Auriacombe;Oscar D'Agnone;Lorenzo Somaini

  • Craving and substance use among patients with alcohol, tobacco, cannabis or heroin addiction: a comparison of substance- and person-specific cues.

    Melina Fatseas;Fuschia Serre;Fuschia Serre;Jean-Marc Alexandre;Jean-Marc Alexandre;Romain Debrabant;Romain Debrabant

  • Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors and the Risk of Bleeding

    Robert M Weinrieb;Marc Auriacombe;Kevin G Lynch;James D Lewis

  • Benzodiazepine use among opiate-dependent subjects in buprenorphine maintenance treatment: correlates of use, abuse and dependence.

    Estelle Lavie;Mélina Fatséas;Cécile Denis;Marc Auriacombe

  • Ecological momentary assessment in alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and opiate dependence: a comparison of feasibility and validity.

    Fuschia Serre;Melina Fatseas;Romain Debrabant;Jean-Marc Alexandre

  • Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine mono-dependence management in outpatient settings (withdrawn review).

    Cecile Denis;Melina Fatseas;Estelle Lavie;Marc Auriacombe

  • Trust and acceptance of a virtual psychiatric interview between embodied conversational agents and outpatients.

    Pierre Philip;Pierre Philip;Lucile Dupuy;Lucile Dupuy;Marc Auriacombe;Marc Auriacombe;Fushia Serre;Fushia Serre

  • Predictors of craving and substance use among patients with alcohol, tobacco, cannabis or opiate addictions: Commonalities and specificities across substances

    Fuschia Serre;Melina Fatseas;Cécile Denis;Joel Swendsen

  • Cannabis et psychose : recherche d’un lien de causalité à partir d’une revue critique systématique de la littérature

    P.-Y. Le Bec;M. Fatséas;C. Denis;E. Lavie

  • Self-perceived motivation for benzodiazepine use and behavior related to benzodiazepine use among opiate-dependent patients.

    Mélina Fatséas;Estelle Lavie;Cécile Denis;Marc Auriacombe

  • Addiction and personality

    P Franques;M Auriacombe;J Tignol

  • A socio-structural approach to preventing injection drug use initiation: rationale for the PRIMER study

    Daniel Werb;Richard Garfein;Thomas Kerr;Peter Davidson

  • Mortality Associated With Time in and Out of Buprenorphine Treatment in French Office-Based General Practice: A 7-Year Cohort Study

    Julie Dupouy;Aurore Palmaro;Mélina Fatséas;Marc Auriacombe

  • Motivations for using electronic cigarettes in young adults: A systematic review.

    Shérazade Kinouani;Shérazade Kinouani;Chloé Leflot;Paul Vanderkam;Marc Auriacombe

  • Persistence and Subtype Stability of ADHD Among Substance Use Disorder Treatment Seekers.

    Sharlene Kaye;Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga;Geurt van de Glind;Frances R. Levin

  • Griffiths et al.'s comments on the international consensus statement of internet gaming disorder: furthering consensus or hindering progress?

    Nancy M. Petry;Florian Rehbein;Douglas A. Gentile;Jeroen S. Lemmens

  • The DSM-5 field trials and reliability of alcohol use disorder.

    Deborah S. Hasin;Marc Auriacombe;Guilherme Borges;Kathleen Bucholz

  • Non-medical use of prescription gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) in five european countries

    Francina Fonseca;William Lenahan;Richard C Dart;Esther Papaseit

  • Risk Factors for Borderline Personality Disorder in Treatment Seeking Patients with a Substance Use Disorder: An International Multicenter Study

    Manuela Wapp;Geurt Van De Glind;Geurt Van De Glind;Katelijne Van Emmerik-Van Oortmerssen;Geert Dom

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre Philip
Pierre Philip University of Bordeaux
Joel Swendsen
Joel Swendsen University of Bordeaux
Charles P. O'Brien
Charles P. O'Brien University of Pennsylvania
Maarten W. J. Koeter
Maarten W. J. Koeter University of Amsterdam
Geert Dom
Geert Dom University of Antwerp
Robert A. Schoevers
Robert A. Schoevers University Medical Center Groningen
Wim van den Brink
Wim van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Guilherme Borges
Guilherme Borges Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría
Sharlene Kaye
Sharlene Kaye University of New South Wales
Frances R. Levin
Frances R. Levin Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse online degree options tailored to multiple career goals. Students interested in mental health and human behavior can pursue affordable online masters in psychology, which provide cost-effective routes toward careers in counseling, therapy, or research.

For those already rooted in education, edd programs online offer flexible, accelerated learning while preparing candidates for leadership roles or specialized administrative positions. Fast-track online options can shorten the traditional degree timeline without sacrificing quality or accreditation standards.

Additionally, online master's degree programs allow students to quickly upskill within a year, ideal for those seeking career advancement or a career change in fields like sociology, communication, or political science. Similarly, undergraduates can benefit from online accelerated bachelor's degree offerings to fast-track their entry into the workforce or prepare for advanced study.

These flexible online pathways allow students to balance studies with work or personal commitments—making Social Sciences and Humanities education in the USA more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Auriacombe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles