World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
7195
World Ranking
7028
National Ranking
2364

M. Kim Fondrk publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Kim Fondrk sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

M. Kim Fondrk D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Kim Fondrk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Kim Fondrk is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research and academic career is connected to this institution, contributing to the academic community there.

There is no available record of recent papers, specific topics, or fields of study directly associated with M. Kim Fondrk. Similarly, there are no listed frequent co-authors or publication venues documented in the available data.

The absence of details regarding papers, co-authors, or main and subfields of study limits the scope of understanding of Fondrk's specific research interests or specializations. There is no information provided on awards or distinctions that Fondrk may have received.

No book publications or records of the number of books published by Fondrk with any specific publishers have been noted.

This profile focuses solely on verified institutional affiliation and does not include conjecture or unsupported details regarding the academic activities or contributions of M. Kim Fondrk.

Best Publications

  • The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein.

    Martin Beye;Martin Hasselmann;M.Kim Fondrk;Robert E Page

  • The gene vitellogenin has multiple coordinating effects on social organization.

    C. Mindy Nelson;Kate E Ihle;M. Kim Fondrk;Robert E Page

  • The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)

    R. E. Page;J. Erber;M. K. Fondrk

  • Reproductive ground plan may mediate colony-level selection effects on individual foraging behavior in honey bees

    Gro V. Amdam;Kari Norberg;M. Kim Fondrk;Robert E. Page

  • The Making of a Queen: TOR Pathway Is a Key Player in Diphenic Caste Development

    Avani Patel;M. Kim Fondrk;Osman Kaftanoglu;Christine Emore

  • Social reversal of immunosenescence in honey bee workers.

    Gro V. Amdam;Anne Lene T.O. Aase;Siri-Christine Seehuus;M. Kim Fondrk

  • Complex social behaviour derived from maternal reproductive traits

    Gro V. Amdam;Gro V. Amdam;Angela Csondes;M. Kim Fondrk;Robert E. Page

  • The effects of colony-level selection on the social organization of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies: colony-level components of pollen hoarding

    Robert E. Page;M. Kim Fondrk

  • Brood pheromone stimulates pollen foraging in honey bees ( Apis mellifera )

    Tanya Pankiw;Robert E. Page;M. Kim Fondrk

  • Major Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Honey Bee Foraging Behavior

    G J Hunt;R E Page;M K Fondrk;C J Dullum

  • Behavioral genomics of honeybee foraging and nest defense

    Greg J. Hunt;Gro V. Amdam;David Schlipalius;Christine Emore

  • Regulation of life history determines lifespan of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

    Olav Rueppell;Cédric Bachelier;M. Kim Fondrk;Robert E. Page

  • Quantitative Trait Loci for Honey Bee Stinging Behavior and Body Size

    G J Hunt;E Guzmán-Novoa;M K Fondrk;R E Page

  • Effects of worker genotypic diversity on honey bee colony development and behavior (Apis mellifera L.)

    Robert E. Page;Gene E. Robinson;M. Kim Fondrk;Medhat E. Nasr

  • Regulation of pollen foraging in honeybee colonies: effects of young brood, stored pollen, and empty space

    Claudia Dreller;Robert E. Page;M. Kim Fondrk

  • Genetic specialists, kin recognition and nepotism in honey-bee colonies

    Robert E. Page;Gene E. Robinson;M. Kim Fondrk

  • Genetic dissection of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging behavior

    RE Page;MK Fondrk;GJ Hunt;E Guzmán-Novoa

  • Effects of worker genotypic diversity on honey bee colony development and behavior ( Apis mellifera L.)

    Unknown

  • Genetic determinants of honey bee foraging behaviour

    Robert E. Page;Keith D. Waddington;Greg J. Hunt;M. Kim Fondrk

  • Insulin-like peptide genes in honey bee fat body respond differently to manipulation of social behavioral physiology

    Kari-Anne Nilsen;Kate E. Ihle;Katy Frederick;M. Kim Fondrk

  • Variation in Endocrine Signaling Underlies Variation in Social Life History

    Gro V. Amdam;Kari‐Anne Nilsen;Kari Norberg;M. Kim Fondrk

  • The genetic architecture of the behavioral ontogeny of foraging in honeybee workers.

    Olav Rueppell;Tanya Pankiw;David I. Nielsen;M. Kim Fondrk

  • The nurse's load: early-life exposure to brood-rearing affects behavior and lifespan in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

    Gro V. Amdam;Olav Rueppell;M. Kim Fondrk;Robert E. Page

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Page
Robert E. Page University of California, Davis
Gro V. Amdam
Gro V. Amdam Arizona State University
Olav Rueppell
Olav Rueppell University of Alberta
Gene E. Robinson
Gene E. Robinson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Klaus Hartfelder
Klaus Hartfelder Universidade de São Paulo
Xavier Vekemans
Xavier Vekemans University of Lille
Mark L. Winston
Mark L. Winston Simon Fraser University
Robbin W. Thorp
Robbin W. Thorp University of California, Davis
Gloria DeGrandi-Hoffman
Gloria DeGrandi-Hoffman United States Department of Agriculture

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Ecology and Evolution but want to explore related career paths, there are a range of online degrees that can expand your options. Fields such as human services, psychology, and counseling often intersect with ecological work, especially in areas like environmental advocacy, behavioral science, and community education.

Those seeking accelerated qualifications may consider an accelerated human services degree online to quickly enter fields supporting individuals, families, and communities. For students drawn toward working with youth, an online masters child psychology is a valuable way to understand developmental, social, and cultural influences – which often overlap with environmental factors.

Those interested in direct client support or community counseling roles should explore the cheapest masters in counseling online programs as a flexible and affordable path to professional practice. Additionally, students aiming for clinical settings may benefit from a clinical psychology online degree, offering essential skills in assessment and intervention.

Pairing ecological studies with these online degrees can open diverse career opportunities in research, advocacy, policy, education, and direct support.

Best Scientists Citing M. Kim Fondrk

Recently Published Articles