World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
7975
World Ranking
9049
National Ranking
673

Luke Parry publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke Parry sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 73 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Luke Parry D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke Parry sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luke Parry is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a substantial body of work in subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

The main topics of Luke Parry's research include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management; Fish biology, ecology, and behavior; Indigenous Health and Education; Child Nutrition and Water Access; Primate Behavior and Ecology; Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; and Fish Ecology and Management Studies.

Recent publications demonstrate a wide range of interests within environmental and ecological disciplines. Notable papers include:

  • "Wild Meat Is Still on the Menu: Progress in Wild Meat Research, Policy, and Practice from 2002 to 2020," 2021, Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • "Integrated terrestrial-freshwater planning doubles conservation of tropical aquatic species," 2020, Science
  • "Adding forests to the water-energy-food nexus," 2020, Nature Sustainability
  • "Tough fishing and severe seasonal food insecurity in Amazonian flooded forests," 2020, People and Nature
  • "Fire risk perpetuates poverty and fire use among Amazonian smallholders," 2020, Global Environmental Change

Luke Parry frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Jos Barlow, Patrícia Carignano Torres, Erick A. Chacón-Montalván, Alexander Charles Lees, and Felipe P. L. Melo, each with multiple joint publications.

Their work appears regularly in key academic venues such as Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America, Nature Sustainability, People and Nature, Conservation Biology, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests.

    J. Barlow;T. A. Gardner;I. S. Araujo;T. C. Ávila-Pires

  • Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation

    Jos Barlow;Jos Barlow;Jos Barlow;Gareth D. Lennox;Joice Ferreira;Erika Berenguer

  • The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests

    Toby A. Gardner;Jos Barlow;Jos Barlow;Jos Barlow;Ivanei S. Araujo;Teresa Cristina Ávila-Pires

  • Boom-and-Bust Development Patterns Across the Amazon Deforestation Frontier

    Ana S. L. Rodrigues;Ana S. L. Rodrigues;Ana S. L. Rodrigues;Robert M. Ewers;Luke Parry;Carlos Souza

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • Brazil's environmental leadership at risk

    J. Ferreira;L. E. O. C. Aragao;Jos Barlow;P. Barreto

  • Predicting the Uncertain Future of Tropical Forest Species in a Data Vacuum

    Toby A. Gardner;Jos Barlow;Jos Barlow;Luke W. Parry;Luke W. Parry;Carlos A. Peres

  • A framework for integrating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes

    Toby A. Gardner;Toby A. Gardner;Neil D. Burgess;Neil D. Burgess;Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui;Jos Barlow;Jos Barlow

  • A social and ecological assessment of tropical land uses at multiple scales: the Sustainable Amazon Network

    Toby A. Gardner;Toby A. Gardner;Joice Ferreira;Jos Barlow;Alexander C. Lees

  • How pristine are tropical forests? An ecological perspective on the pre-Columbian human footprint in Amazonia and implications for contemporary conservation

    Jos Barlow;Toby A. Gardner;Alexander C. Lees;Luke Parry

  • Wild Meat Is Still on the Menu: Progress in Wild Meat Research, Policy, and Practice from 2002 to 2020

    D.J. Ingram;L. Coad;L. Coad;E.G. Milner-Gulland;L. Parry

  • The critical importance of considering fire in REDD+ programs

    Jos Barlow;Luke Parry;Toby A. Gardner;Toby A. Gardner;Joice Ferreira

  • Adding forests to the water–energy–food nexus

    Felipe P. L. Melo;Luke Parry;Pedro H. S. Brancalion;Severino R. R. Pinto

  • Integrated terrestrial-freshwater planning doubles conservation of tropical aquatic species

    Cecília G. Leal;Cecília G. Leal;Gareth D. Lennox;Silvio F. B. Ferraz;Joice Ferreira

  • Improving the design and management of forest strips in human-dominated tropical landscapes: a field test on Amazonian dung beetles

    Jos Barlow;Julio Louzada;Luke Parry;Malva I.M. Hernández

  • Drivers of rural exodus from Amazonian headwaters

    Luke Parry;Luke Parry;Luke Parry;Brett Day;Silvana Amaral;Carlos A. Peres

  • Evaluating the use of local ecological knowledge to monitor hunted tropical-forest wildlife over large spatial scales

    Luke Parry;Carlos A. Peres

  • Hunting for sustainability in tropical secondary forests

    Luke Parry;Luke Parry;Jos Barlow;Carlos A. Peres

  • Allocation of hunting effort by Amazonian smallholders: Implications for conserving wildlife in mixed-use landscapes

    Luke Parry;Luke Parry;Jos Barlow;Carlos A. Peres

  • Large-vertebrate assemblages of primary and secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon

    Luke Parry;Jos Barlow;Carlos A. Peres

  • Wildlife harvest and consumption in Amazonia's urbanized wilderness

    Luke Parry;Luke Parry;Jos Barlow;Jos Barlow;Heloisa Correia Pereira

  • Special Issue Article: Advancing Environmental Conservation: Essays In Honor Of Navjot Sodhi How pristine are tropical forests? An ecological perspective on the pre-Columbian human footprint in Amazonia and implications for contemporary conservation

    Jos Barlow;Toby A. Gardner;Alexander C. Lees;Luke Parry

Frequent Co-Authors

Jos Barlow
Jos Barlow Lancaster University
Toby A. Gardner
Toby A. Gardner Stockholm Environment Institute
Carlos A. Peres
Carlos A. Peres University of East Anglia
Alexander C. Lees
Alexander C. Lees Manchester Metropolitan University
Joice Ferreira
Joice Ferreira Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation
Luiz E. O. C. Aragão
Luiz E. O. C. Aragão National Institute for Space Research
Julio Louzada
Julio Louzada Federal University of Lavras
Renata Pardini
Renata Pardini Universidade de São Paulo
Erika Berenguer
Erika Berenguer University of Oxford
Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira
Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse opportunities. Many professionals consider advancing their education through accredited eds to edd programs that focus on leadership and research, which are valuable in environmental policy and educational roles.

Those interested in social aspects of environmental work might explore dsw online programs. These programs prepare graduates to address community and social challenges related to environmental justice and sustainability.

For students seeking flexible and budget-friendly options, an online general studies degree affordable can provide a broad educational foundation that supports a range of environmental careers. This pathway is ideal for those who want to combine multiple interests with environmental science.

Additionally, many prospective students start with the easiest bachelor's degree programs available online, which can help build essential skills before specializing further in Environmental Sciences or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Luke Parry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles