World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
33
Citations
11009
World Ranking
7002
National Ranking
3402

Linda Dusenbury publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Dusenbury sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 77 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Linda Dusenbury D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Dusenbury sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda Dusenbury is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and focuses their research within the social sciences, particularly in education and clinical psychology. Their work primarily explores topics related to child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, youth development and social support, early childhood education and development, as well as education discipline and inequality.

Their recent publications include two papers: Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students (2020, American Psychologist) and State education policies as a critical component of systemic SEL: Roger Weissberg's vision and continuing impact (2025, Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and Policy).

Linda Dusenbury has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Joseph L. Mahoney
  • Roger P. Weissberg
  • Mark T. Greenberg
  • Robert J. Jagers
  • Karen Niemi

Their work has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • American Psychologist
  • Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and Policy

Their studies are situated in the subfields of education, clinical psychology, and safety research.

Best Publications

  • A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings

    Linda Dusenbury;Rosalind Brannigan;Mathea Falco;William B. Hansen

  • Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Eli Baker;Linda Dusenbury;Elizabeth M. Botvin

  • Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: results of a 3-year study.

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Eli Baker;Linda Dusenbury;Stephanie Tortu

  • Component social support processes: comments and integration.

    Kenneth Heller;Ralph W. Swindle;Linda Dusenbury

  • Eleven Components of Effective Drug Abuse Prevention Curricula

    Linda Dusenbury;Mathea Falco

  • Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions

    Linda Dusenbury;Rosalind Brannigan;William B. Hansen;John Walsh

  • Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students.

    Joseph L Mahoney;Roger P Weissberg;Mark T Greenberg;Linda Dusenbury

  • Environmental and Policy Approaches to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Through Physical Activity: Issues and Opportunities

    Abby C. King;Robert W. Jeffery;Fred Fridinger;Linda Dusenbury

  • Substance abuse prevention: competence enhancement and the development of positive life options.

    Linda Dusenbury;Gilbert J. Botvin

  • Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables.

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Linda Dusenbury;Eli Baker;Susan James-Ortiz

  • A skills training approach to smoking prevention among Hispanic youth.

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Linda Dusenbury;Eli Baker;Susan James-Ortiz

  • Nine Critical Elements of Promising Violence Prevention Programs

    Linda Dusenbury;Mathea Falco;Antonia Lake;Rosalind Brannigan

  • A Psychosocial Approach to Smoking Prevention for Urban Black Youth

    G J Botvin;H W Batson;S Witts-Vitale;V Bess

  • Smoking behavior of adolescents exposed to cigarette advertising.

    Botvin Gj;Goldberg Cj;Botvin Em;Dusenbury L

  • The false consensus effect: predicting adolescents' tobacco use from normative expectations.

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Elizabeth M. Botvin;Eli Baker;Linda Dusenbury

  • CORRELATES AND PREDICTORS OF SMOKING AMONG BLACK ADOLESCENTS

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Eli Baker;Catherine J. Goldberg;Linda Dusenbury

  • Ethnicity and Psychosocial Factors in Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Adolescence

    Barbara A. Bettes;Linda Dusenbury;Jon Kerner;Susan James-Ortiz

  • Predictors of smoking prevalence among New York Latino youth.

    L Dusenbury;J F Kerner;E Baker;G Botvin

  • A Review of the Evaluation of 47 Drug Abuse Prevention Curricula Available Nationally

    Linda Dusenbury;Mathea Falco;Antonia Lake

  • Factors promoting cigarette smoking among black youth: A causal modeling approach

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Eli Baker;Elizabeth M. Botvin;Linda Dusenbury

Frequent Co-Authors

Gilbert J. Botvin
Gilbert J. Botvin Cornell University
William B. Hansen
William B. Hansen University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Christopher L. Ringwalt
Christopher L. Ringwalt University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Roger P. Weissberg
Roger P. Weissberg University of Illinois at Chicago
Jennifer A. Epstein
Jennifer A. Epstein Cornell University
Celene E. Domitrovich
Celene E. Domitrovich Georgetown University Medical Center
Mark T. Greenberg
Mark T. Greenberg Pennsylvania State University
Steven P. Schinke
Steven P. Schinke Columbia University
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt Georgetown University
Abby C. King
Abby C. King Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Social Sciences and Humanities often leads students to counseling, education, or psychology fields. Today, many accredited programs offer the flexibility of online learning, making it easier to balance work or personal commitments with academic goals.

Those interested in clinical or counseling roles might consider online psyd programs focused on advanced psychological practice. For aspiring marriage and family therapists, lmft programs provide specialized training and can often be completed in less time through accelerated formats.

Budget-conscious learners can pursue an affordable online masters in psychology from reputable universities, helping to reduce student debt without sacrificing education quality. If your passion lies in education, enrolling in one of the easiest edd programs enables you to advance your career in educational leadership more quickly.

Whether you're beginning a new journey or seeking to specialize, online degrees offer diverse pathways to impactful and meaningful careers in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Dusenbury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles