World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 33 7002 6501 3402 3101 77 11009

Linda Dusenbury publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Dusenbury between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Dusenbury published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 1992. 1 of the 78 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 1992. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1986 2025

78 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Dusenbury: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 4
1991 1
1992 6
1993 4
1994 4
1995 3
1996 2
1997 4
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 3
2010 4
2011 2
2012 1
2013 4
2014 3
2015 4
2016 1
2017 5
2018 2
2019 0
2020 2
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 78
Download as CSV

Linda Dusenbury publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Dusenbury sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 77 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 77
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Dusenbury D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Dusenbury sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188 33
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda Dusenbury is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and focuses their research within the social sciences, particularly in education and clinical psychology. Their work primarily explores topics related to child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, youth development and social support, early childhood education and development, as well as education discipline and inequality.

Their recent publications include two papers: Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students (2020, American Psychologist) and State education policies as a critical component of systemic SEL: Roger Weissberg's vision and continuing impact (2025, Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and Policy).

Linda Dusenbury has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Joseph L. Mahoney
  • Roger P. Weissberg
  • Mark T. Greenberg
  • Robert J. Jagers
  • Karen Niemi

Their work has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • American Psychologist
  • Social and Emotional Learning Research Practice and Policy

Their studies are situated in the subfields of education, clinical psychology, and safety research.

Best Publications

  • A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings

    Linda Dusenbury;Rosalind Brannigan;Mathea Falco;William B. Hansen

  • Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Eli Baker;Linda Dusenbury;Elizabeth M. Botvin

  • Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioral approach: results of a 3-year study.

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Eli Baker;Linda Dusenbury;Stephanie Tortu

  • Component social support processes: comments and integration.

    Kenneth Heller;Ralph W. Swindle;Linda Dusenbury

  • Eleven Components of Effective Drug Abuse Prevention Curricula

    Linda Dusenbury;Mathea Falco

  • Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions

    Linda Dusenbury;Rosalind Brannigan;William B. Hansen;John Walsh

  • Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students.

    Joseph L Mahoney;Roger P Weissberg;Mark T Greenberg;Linda Dusenbury

  • Environmental and Policy Approaches to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Through Physical Activity: Issues and Opportunities

    Abby C. King;Robert W. Jeffery;Fred Fridinger;Linda Dusenbury

  • Substance abuse prevention: competence enhancement and the development of positive life options.

    Linda Dusenbury;Gilbert J. Botvin

  • Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables.

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Linda Dusenbury;Eli Baker;Susan James-Ortiz

  • A skills training approach to smoking prevention among Hispanic youth.

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Linda Dusenbury;Eli Baker;Susan James-Ortiz

  • Nine Critical Elements of Promising Violence Prevention Programs

    Linda Dusenbury;Mathea Falco;Antonia Lake;Rosalind Brannigan

  • A Psychosocial Approach to Smoking Prevention for Urban Black Youth

    G J Botvin;H W Batson;S Witts-Vitale;V Bess

  • Smoking behavior of adolescents exposed to cigarette advertising.

    Botvin Gj;Goldberg Cj;Botvin Em;Dusenbury L

  • The false consensus effect: predicting adolescents' tobacco use from normative expectations.

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Elizabeth M. Botvin;Eli Baker;Linda Dusenbury

  • CORRELATES AND PREDICTORS OF SMOKING AMONG BLACK ADOLESCENTS

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Eli Baker;Catherine J. Goldberg;Linda Dusenbury

  • Ethnicity and Psychosocial Factors in Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Adolescence

    Barbara A. Bettes;Linda Dusenbury;Jon Kerner;Susan James-Ortiz

  • Predictors of smoking prevalence among New York Latino youth.

    L Dusenbury;J F Kerner;E Baker;G Botvin

  • A Review of the Evaluation of 47 Drug Abuse Prevention Curricula Available Nationally

    Linda Dusenbury;Mathea Falco;Antonia Lake

  • Factors promoting cigarette smoking among black youth: A causal modeling approach

    Gilbert J. Botvin;Eli Baker;Elizabeth M. Botvin;Linda Dusenbury

Frequent Co-Authors

Gilbert J. Botvin
Gilbert J. Botvin Cornell University
William B. Hansen
William B. Hansen University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Christopher L. Ringwalt
Christopher L. Ringwalt University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Roger P. Weissberg
Roger P. Weissberg University of Illinois at Chicago
Jennifer A. Epstein
Jennifer A. Epstein Cornell University
Celene E. Domitrovich
Celene E. Domitrovich Georgetown University Medical Center
Mark T. Greenberg
Mark T. Greenberg Pennsylvania State University
Steven P. Schinke
Steven P. Schinke Columbia University
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt Georgetown University
Abby C. King
Abby C. King Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Social Sciences and Humanities often leads students to counseling, education, or psychology fields. Today, many accredited programs offer the flexibility of online learning, making it easier to balance work or personal commitments with academic goals.

Those interested in clinical or counseling roles might consider online psyd programs focused on advanced psychological practice. For aspiring marriage and family therapists, lmft programs provide specialized training and can often be completed in less time through accelerated formats.

Budget-conscious learners can pursue an affordable online masters in psychology from reputable universities, helping to reduce student debt without sacrificing education quality. If your passion lies in education, enrolling in one of the easiest edd programs enables you to advance your career in educational leadership more quickly.

Whether you're beginning a new journey or seeking to specialize, online degrees offer diverse pathways to impactful and meaningful careers in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Dusenbury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles