World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
10865
World Ranking
5296
National Ranking
2365

Linda C. Cork publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda C. Cork sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 145 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Linda C. Cork D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda C. Cork sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda C. Cork is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. The scientist's academic focus and contributions are linked to this institution.

Details about recent publications, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not available. Similarly, data on the main fields and subfields of study, as well as the main topics of work, have not been provided.

There are no records of book publications or awards won associated with Linda C. Cork. The absence of these records indicates a focus on areas not documented in the available source data or that such details have not been disclosed.

As the profile excludes additional information on specific research themes, collaborations, or outputs, the summary remains concise with reference to the scientist's institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Conservation of brain amyloid proteins in aged mammals and humans with Alzheimer's disease

    Dennis J. Selkoe;Douglas S. Bell;Marcia B. Podlisny;Donald L. Price

  • Increased expression of neurofilament subunit NF-L produces morphological alterations that resemble the pathology of human motor neuron disease

    Zuoshang Xu;Linda C. Cork;John W. Griffin;Don W. Cleveland

  • Age-Dependent Impairment of Mitochondrial Function in Primate Brain

    A C Bowling;E M Mutisya;L C Walker;D L Price

  • Age-related changes in multiple neurotransmitter systems in the monkey brain.

    Gary L. Wenk;Donna J. Pierce;Robert G. Struble;Donald L. Price

  • Aged monkeys exhibit behavioral deficits indicative of widespread cerebral dysfunction.

    Jocelyne Bachevalier;Linda S. Landis;Lary C. Walker;Mimi Brickson

  • Cholinergic innervation in neuritic plaques.

    Robert G. Struble;Linda C. Cork;Peter J. Whitehouse;Donald L. Price

  • Loss of NMDA, but not GABA-A, binding in the brains of aged rats and monkeys

    Gary L. Wenk;Lary C. Walker;Donald L. Price;Linda C. Cork

  • Social deprivation of infant rhesus monkeys alters the chemoarchitecture of the brain: I. Subcortical regions

    Lee J. Martin;Dawn M. Spicer;Mark H. Lewis;John P. Gluck

  • Senile plaques in cortex of aged normal monkeys.

    Robert G. Struble;Donald L. Price;Linda C. Cork

  • Amyloid precursor protein in aged nonhuman primates.

    Lee J. Martin;Sangram S. Sisodia;Edward H. Koo;Linda C. Cork

  • Evidence for cholinergic neurites in senile plaques

    Cheryl A. Kitt;Donald L. Price;Robert G. Struble;Linda C. Cork

  • Neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques in aged bears.

    Linda C. Cork;Richard E. Powers;Dennis J. Selkoe;Peter Davies

  • Phosphorylated neurofilament antigens in neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease.

    Linda C. Cork;Nancy H. Sternberger;Ludwig A. Sternberger;Manuel F. Casanova

  • Age differences in recognition memory of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).

    Sharon K. Presty;Jocelyne Bachevalier;Lary C. Walker;Robert G. Struble

  • Differential expression of amyloid precursor protein mRNAs in cases of Alzheimer's disease and in aged nonhuman primates

    Edward H. Koo;Sangram S. Sisodia;Linda C. Cork;Axel Unterbeck

  • The neural basis of memory decline in aged monkeys.

    Lary C. Walker;Cheryl A. Kitt;Robert G. Struble;Molly V. Wagster

  • Development of senile plaques. Relationships of neuronal abnormalities and amyloid deposits

    L. C. Cork;C. Masters;K. Beyreuther;D. L. Price

  • Injury of nigral neurons exposed to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine: a tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemical study in monkey.

    C.A. Kitt;L.C. Cork;F. Eidelberg;T.H. Joh

  • Aged Non-Human Primates: An Animal Model of Age-Associated Neurodegenerative Disease

    Donald L. Price;Lee J Martin;Sangram S. Sisodia;Molly V. Wagster

  • Alzheimer's Disease and Down's Syndrome*

    Donald L. Price;Peter J. Whitehouse;Robert G. Struble;Joseph T. Coyle

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald L. Price
Donald L. Price Johns Hopkins University
Lary C. Walker
Lary C. Walker Emory University
Cheryl A. Kitt
Cheryl A. Kitt Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John W. Griffin
John W. Griffin Johns Hopkins University
Lee J. Martin
Lee J. Martin Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Sangram S. Sisodia
Sangram S. Sisodia University of Chicago
Robert G. Struble
Robert G. Struble Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Dennis J. Selkoe
Dennis J. Selkoe Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jerry A. Winkelstein
Jerry A. Winkelstein Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Manuel F. Casanova
Manuel F. Casanova University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, there are a range of related online degrees and career pathways to consider. Many students choose to enhance their neuroscience studies with knowledge in fields like counseling, therapy, and psychology. These areas not only broaden your career options but also provide practical skills for working directly with individuals and families.

To ensure a high-quality education, many students look for cacrep-accredited programs when exploring graduate options in counseling. This accreditation is important for licensing and future employment. For those just starting out, pursuing a counseling bachelor's degree online can be a flexible and affordable way to enter the field.

If you’re interested in specializing, mft masters programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) offer targeted training for careers focused on family dynamics and relationship counseling. Cost is another key consideration—it's valuable to understand how much does masters in psychology cost before enrolling in advanced programs. Exploring these online options can help you align your education with your career goals in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Linda C. Cork

Recently Published Articles