World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 55 4767 4384 146 137 211 9634

Liesbeth Reneman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Liesbeth Reneman between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Liesbeth Reneman published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 24 of the 234 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 9 publications
1997 2025

234 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Liesbeth Reneman: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 4
2000 5
2001 11
2002 10
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 4
2007 4
2008 4
2009 3
2010 0
2011 3
2012 10
2013 11
2014 12
2015 17
2016 12
2017 15
2018 15
2019 9
2020 13
2021 19
2022 13
2023 8
2024 15
2025 9
Total 234
Download as CSV

Liesbeth Reneman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liesbeth Reneman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 211 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262 211
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Liesbeth Reneman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liesbeth Reneman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392 55
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Liesbeth Reneman is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, where their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work encompasses a substantial number of publications related to Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Pharmacology.

The scientist's research themes include advanced neuroimaging techniques, functional brain connectivity studies, and mental health topics such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and major depression. They have contributed to studies on the treatment of major depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and broader mental health research areas. The following topics represent key areas of their work:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Reneman has frequently published in several venues, with a notable presence in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neuroscience Applied, Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Biological Psychiatry, and Molecular Psychiatry. These journals have hosted a significant portion of their research articles.

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuroscience Applied
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Some recent papers exemplify Reneman's contributions to neuroscience and psychiatry, focusing on brain aging, neuroimaging, and psychiatric disorders:

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • ExploreASL: An image processing pipeline for multi-center ASL perfusion MRI studies, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Consortium neuroscience of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder: The ENIGMA adventure, 2020, Human Brain Mapping

Liesbeth Reneman often collaborates with a range of researchers in their field, including Anouk Schrantee, Antonia Kaiser, Zarah van der Pal, Neda Jahanshad, and Paul M. Thompson. These collaborators have worked with Reneman on multiple projects, contributing to the collective advancement of neuroimaging and cognitive neuroscience research.

Best Publications

  • Brain Imaging of the Cortex in ADHD: A Coordinated Analysis of Large-Scale Clinical and Population-Based Samples

    Martine Hoogman;Ryan Muetzel;Joao P. Guimaraes;Elena Shumskaya

  • Cerebral hyporesponsiveness and cognitive impairment 10 years after chemotherapy for breast cancer

    Michiel B. de Ruiter;Michiel B. de Ruiter;Liesbeth Reneman;Willem Boogerd;Dick J. Veltman;Dick J. Veltman

  • Effects of dose, sex, and long-term abstention from use on toxic effects of MDMA (ecstasy) on brain serotonin neurons

    Liesbeth Reneman;Jan Booij;Kora de Bruin;Johannes B Reitsma

  • Effect of age and gender on dopamine transporter imaging with [123I]FP-CIT SPET in healthy volunteers

    J. Lavalaye;J. Booij;L. Reneman;J. B. A. Habraken

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Late effects of high‐dose adjuvant chemotherapy on white and gray matter in breast cancer survivors: Converging results from multimodal magnetic resonance imaging

    Michiel B. de Ruiter;Michiel B. de Ruiter;Michiel B. de Ruiter;Liesbeth Reneman;Willem Boogerd;Dick J. Veltman;Dick J. Veltman

  • Memory disturbances in Ecstasy users are correlated with an altered brain serotonin neurotransmission

    L. Reneman;J. Booij;B. Schmand;W. van den Brink

  • Cortical serotonin transporter density and verbal memory in individuals who stopped using 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or "ecstasy"): preliminary findings.

    L Reneman;J Lavalaye;B Schmand;F A de Wolff

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • The Acute and Chronic Effects of MDMA (“Ecstasy”) on Cortical 5-HT2A Receptors in Rat and Human Brain☆

    Liesbeth Reneman;Erik Endert;Kora de Bruin;Jules Lavalaye

  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing

    Lianne Schmaal;Elena Pozzi;Tiffany C Ho;Tiffany C Ho;Laura S van Velzen

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups

    Premika S W Boedhoe;Daan van Rooij;Martine Hoogman;Jos W R Twisk

  • White matter fractional anisotropy correlates with speed of processing and motor speed in young childhood cancer survivors.

    Eline J. Aukema;Matthan W.A. Caan;Matthan W.A. Caan;Nienke Oudhuis;Charles B.L.M. Majoie

  • Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders : Evidence through univariate and multivariate mega-analysis including 6420 participants from the ENIGMA MDD working group.

    Nils Opel;Anbupalam Thalamuthu;Anbupalam Thalamuthu;Yuri Milaneschi;Dominik Grotegerd

  • MDMA ("Ecstasy") and its association with cerebrovascular accidents: preliminary findings.

    L. Reneman;J.B.A. Habraken;C.B.L.M. Majoie;J. Booij

  • Multimodal MRI and cognitive function in patients with breast cancer prior to adjuvant treatment--the role of fatigue.

    Sanne Menning;Michiel B. de Ruiter;Dick J. Veltman;V. Koppelmans

  • Mood disorders and serotonin transporter density in ecstasy users—the influence of long-term abstention, dose, and gender

    Maartje M. L. de Win;Liesbeth Reneman;Johannes B. Reitsma;Gerard J. den Heeten

  • Sustained effects of ecstasy on the human brain: a prospective neuroimaging study in novel users.

    Maartje M. L. de Win;Gerry Jager;Jan Booij;Liesbeth Reneman

  • ExploreASL: An image processing pipeline for multi-center ASL perfusion MRI studies

    Henk J.M.M. Mutsaerts;Jan Petr;Paul Groot;Pieter Vandemaele

  • Fluoxetine exerts age-dependent effects on behavior and amygdala neuroplasticity in the rat

    Judith R. Homberg;Jocelien D. A. Olivier;Tom Blom;Tim Arentsen

  • Neuroimaging findings with MDMA/ecstasy: technical aspects, conceptual issues and future prospects.

    Liesbeth Reneman;Maartje M. L. de Win;Wim van den Brink;Jan Booij

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Booij
Jan Booij University of Amsterdam
Michiel B. de Ruiter
Michiel B. de Ruiter Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Wim van den Brink
Wim van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Thomas Frodl
Thomas Frodl Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Paul J. Lucassen
Paul J. Lucassen University of Amsterdam
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Judith R. Homberg
Judith R. Homberg Radboud University
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
W. van den Brink
W. van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Neda Jahanshad
Neda Jahanshad University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree programs and professional pathways in mental health, psychology, and counseling. Many students use their neuroscience backgrounds to pursue advanced education and specialized careers in these growing fields.

For those interested in becoming counselors, there are several cacrep accredited schools offering affordable online graduate degrees tailored to meet counseling licensure requirements. Alternatively, if your interests lie in clinical practice, explore programs in online clinical mental health counseling to gain the skills needed to support individuals in diverse healthcare settings.

If working with families and couples appeals to you, there are accredited online MFT programs accredited for aspiring marriage and family therapists. Additionally, a background in neuroscience is excellent preparation for advanced study in psychology – consider the wide range of masters programs in psychology available fully online.

By combining neuroscience expertise with related online graduate study, students can unlock flexible career opportunities across clinical, research, and academic environments.

Best Scientists Citing Liesbeth Reneman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles