World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
9634
World Ranking
4767
National Ranking
146

Liesbeth Reneman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liesbeth Reneman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 211 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Liesbeth Reneman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liesbeth Reneman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Liesbeth Reneman is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, where their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work encompasses a substantial number of publications related to Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Pharmacology.

The scientist's research themes include advanced neuroimaging techniques, functional brain connectivity studies, and mental health topics such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and major depression. They have contributed to studies on the treatment of major depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and broader mental health research areas. The following topics represent key areas of their work:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Reneman has frequently published in several venues, with a notable presence in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neuroscience Applied, Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Biological Psychiatry, and Molecular Psychiatry. These journals have hosted a significant portion of their research articles.

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuroscience Applied
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Some recent papers exemplify Reneman's contributions to neuroscience and psychiatry, focusing on brain aging, neuroimaging, and psychiatric disorders:

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • ExploreASL: An image processing pipeline for multi-center ASL perfusion MRI studies, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Consortium neuroscience of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder: The ENIGMA adventure, 2020, Human Brain Mapping

Liesbeth Reneman often collaborates with a range of researchers in their field, including Anouk Schrantee, Antonia Kaiser, Zarah van der Pal, Neda Jahanshad, and Paul M. Thompson. These collaborators have worked with Reneman on multiple projects, contributing to the collective advancement of neuroimaging and cognitive neuroscience research.

Best Publications

  • Brain Imaging of the Cortex in ADHD: A Coordinated Analysis of Large-Scale Clinical and Population-Based Samples

    Martine Hoogman;Ryan Muetzel;Joao P. Guimaraes;Elena Shumskaya

  • Cerebral hyporesponsiveness and cognitive impairment 10 years after chemotherapy for breast cancer

    Michiel B. de Ruiter;Michiel B. de Ruiter;Liesbeth Reneman;Willem Boogerd;Dick J. Veltman;Dick J. Veltman

  • Effects of dose, sex, and long-term abstention from use on toxic effects of MDMA (ecstasy) on brain serotonin neurons

    Liesbeth Reneman;Jan Booij;Kora de Bruin;Johannes B Reitsma

  • Effect of age and gender on dopamine transporter imaging with [123I]FP-CIT SPET in healthy volunteers

    J. Lavalaye;J. Booij;L. Reneman;J. B. A. Habraken

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Late effects of high‐dose adjuvant chemotherapy on white and gray matter in breast cancer survivors: Converging results from multimodal magnetic resonance imaging

    Michiel B. de Ruiter;Michiel B. de Ruiter;Michiel B. de Ruiter;Liesbeth Reneman;Willem Boogerd;Dick J. Veltman;Dick J. Veltman

  • Memory disturbances in Ecstasy users are correlated with an altered brain serotonin neurotransmission

    L. Reneman;J. Booij;B. Schmand;W. van den Brink

  • Cortical serotonin transporter density and verbal memory in individuals who stopped using 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or "ecstasy"): preliminary findings.

    L Reneman;J Lavalaye;B Schmand;F A de Wolff

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • The Acute and Chronic Effects of MDMA (“Ecstasy”) on Cortical 5-HT2A Receptors in Rat and Human Brain☆

    Liesbeth Reneman;Erik Endert;Kora de Bruin;Jules Lavalaye

  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing

    Lianne Schmaal;Elena Pozzi;Tiffany C Ho;Tiffany C Ho;Laura S van Velzen

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups

    Premika S W Boedhoe;Daan van Rooij;Martine Hoogman;Jos W R Twisk

  • White matter fractional anisotropy correlates with speed of processing and motor speed in young childhood cancer survivors.

    Eline J. Aukema;Matthan W.A. Caan;Matthan W.A. Caan;Nienke Oudhuis;Charles B.L.M. Majoie

  • Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders : Evidence through univariate and multivariate mega-analysis including 6420 participants from the ENIGMA MDD working group.

    Nils Opel;Anbupalam Thalamuthu;Anbupalam Thalamuthu;Yuri Milaneschi;Dominik Grotegerd

  • MDMA ("Ecstasy") and its association with cerebrovascular accidents: preliminary findings.

    L. Reneman;J.B.A. Habraken;C.B.L.M. Majoie;J. Booij

  • Multimodal MRI and cognitive function in patients with breast cancer prior to adjuvant treatment--the role of fatigue.

    Sanne Menning;Michiel B. de Ruiter;Dick J. Veltman;V. Koppelmans

  • Mood disorders and serotonin transporter density in ecstasy users—the influence of long-term abstention, dose, and gender

    Maartje M. L. de Win;Liesbeth Reneman;Johannes B. Reitsma;Gerard J. den Heeten

  • Sustained effects of ecstasy on the human brain: a prospective neuroimaging study in novel users.

    Maartje M. L. de Win;Gerry Jager;Jan Booij;Liesbeth Reneman

  • ExploreASL: An image processing pipeline for multi-center ASL perfusion MRI studies

    Henk J.M.M. Mutsaerts;Jan Petr;Paul Groot;Pieter Vandemaele

  • Fluoxetine exerts age-dependent effects on behavior and amygdala neuroplasticity in the rat

    Judith R. Homberg;Jocelien D. A. Olivier;Tom Blom;Tim Arentsen

  • Neuroimaging findings with MDMA/ecstasy: technical aspects, conceptual issues and future prospects.

    Liesbeth Reneman;Maartje M. L. de Win;Wim van den Brink;Jan Booij

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Booij
Jan Booij University of Amsterdam
Michiel B. de Ruiter
Michiel B. de Ruiter Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Wim van den Brink
Wim van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Thomas Frodl
Thomas Frodl Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Paul J. Lucassen
Paul J. Lucassen University of Amsterdam
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Judith R. Homberg
Judith R. Homberg Radboud University
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
W. van den Brink
W. van den Brink University of Amsterdam
Neda Jahanshad
Neda Jahanshad University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree programs and professional pathways in mental health, psychology, and counseling. Many students use their neuroscience backgrounds to pursue advanced education and specialized careers in these growing fields.

For those interested in becoming counselors, there are several cacrep accredited schools offering affordable online graduate degrees tailored to meet counseling licensure requirements. Alternatively, if your interests lie in clinical practice, explore programs in online clinical mental health counseling to gain the skills needed to support individuals in diverse healthcare settings.

If working with families and couples appeals to you, there are accredited online MFT programs accredited for aspiring marriage and family therapists. Additionally, a background in neuroscience is excellent preparation for advanced study in psychology – consider the wide range of masters programs in psychology available fully online.

By combining neuroscience expertise with related online graduate study, students can unlock flexible career opportunities across clinical, research, and academic environments.

Best Scientists Citing Liesbeth Reneman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles