World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 39 8382 8045 2992 2778 155 5715

Laura C. Bowling publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laura C. Bowling between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laura C. Bowling published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2020. 6 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2020. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1998 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laura C. Bowling: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 6
2004 2
2005 3
2006 4
2007 3
2008 5
2009 4
2010 12
2011 4
2012 5
2013 5
2014 6
2015 8
2016 12
2017 8
2018 16
2019 9
2020 18
2021 10
2022 7
2023 5
2024 4
2025 2
Total 164
Download as CSV

Laura C. Bowling publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura C. Bowling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 155 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 155
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Laura C. Bowling D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura C. Bowling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275 39
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Laura C. Bowling is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their main field of study is Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change, Ocean Engineering, Environmental Engineering, and Environmental Chemistry.

Their research primarily addresses topics related to Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Water Resources Management and Optimization, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport, Cryospheric Studies and Observations, and Climate Variability and Models.

Frequent coauthors in their work include Jane Frankenberger, Keith A. Cherkauer, Edwin Fredy Bocardo Delgado, Fariborz Daneshvar, and Benjamin D. Reinhart.

Their publications are commonly found in several key scientific journals such as the Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, Climatic Change, Environmental Research Letters, Water, and Journal of Hydrology.

Recent papers authored by Laura C. Bowling include:

  • Impact of controlled drainage on subsurface drain flow and nitrate load: A synthesis of studies across the U.S. Midwest and Southeast (2021, Agricultural Water Management)
  • Agricultural impacts of climate change in Indiana and potential adaptations (2020, Climatic Change)
  • Hydrologic Analysis of an Intensively Irrigated Area in Southern Peru Using a Crop-Field Scale Framework (2021, Water)
  • Comparison of two model calibration approaches and their influence on future projections under climate change in the Upper Indus Basin (2020, Climatic Change)
  • Development of Strategy for SWAT Hydrologic Modeling in Data-Scarce Regions of Peru (2021, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering)

Best Publications

  • Variable infiltration capacity cold land process model updates

    Keith A. Cherkauer;Laura C. Bowling;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • Application of a GIS-based distributed hydrology model for prediction of forest harvest effects on peak stream flow in the Pacific Northwest

    Pascal Storck;Laura Bowling;Paul Wetherbee;Dennis Lettenmaier

  • Simulation of high-latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS phase 2(e) - 1: Experiment description and summary intercomparisons

    Laura C. Bowling;Dennis P. Lettenmaier;Bart Nijssen;Bart Nijssen;L. Phil Graham

  • Hydrologic effects of logging in western Washington, United States

    Laura C. Bowling;Pascal Storck;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • Reclaiming freshwater sustainability in the Cadillac Desert.

    John L. Sabo;Tushar Sinha;Tushar Sinha;Laura C. Bowling;Gerrit H. W. Schoups

  • The role of surface storage in a low-gradient Arctic watershed

    Laura C. Bowling;Douglas L. Kane;Robert E. Gieck;Larry D. Hinzman

  • Simulation of high latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin : PILPS phase 2(e) - 2: Comparison of model results with observations

    Bart Nijssen;Bart Nijssen;Laura C. Bowling;Dennis P. Lettenmaier;Douglas B. Clark

  • Parameterization of Blowing-Snow Sublimation in a Macroscale Hydrology Model

    L. C. Bowling;J. W. Pomeroy;D. P. Lettenmaier

  • Modeling the Effects of Lakes and Wetlands on the Water Balance of Arctic Environments

    Laura C. Bowling;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • The impact of urban development on hydrologic regime from catchment to basin scales

    Guoxiang Yang;Laura C. Bowling;Keith A. Cherkauer;Bryan C. Pijanowski

  • Optimal selection and placement of BMPs and LID practices with a rainfall-runoff model

    Yaoze Liu;Raj Cibin;Vincent F. Bralts;Indrajeet Chaubey

  • Methane emissions from western Siberian wetlands: heterogeneity and sensitivity to climate change

    T. J. Bohn;D. P. Lettenmaier;K. Sathulur;L. C. Bowling

  • Streamflow simulations of the terrestrial Arctic domain

    Fengge Su;Jennifer C. Adam;Laura C. Bowling;Dennis P. Lettenmaier

  • A regional scale assessment of land use/land cover and climatic changes on water and energy cycle in the upper Midwest United States.

    Vimal Mishra;Keith A. Cherkauer;Dev Niyogi;Ming Lei

  • Regional hydrologic response to climate change in the conterminous United States using high-resolution hydroclimate simulations

    Bibi S. Naz;Shih-Chieh Kao;Moetasim Ashfaq;Deeksha Rastogi

  • Influence of climate model biases and daily-scale temperature and precipitation events on hydrological impacts assessment: A case study of the United States

    Moetasim Ashfaq;Moetasim Ashfaq;Moetasim Ashfaq;Laura C. Bowling;Keith Cherkauer;Jeremy S. Pal

  • Estimation of the effects of climate variability on crop yield in the Midwest USA

    Ruoyu Wang;Laura C. Bowling;Keith A. Cherkauer

  • Hydroclimatic response of watersheds to urban intensity: an observational and modeling-based analysis for the White River Basin, Indiana.

    Guoxiang Yang;Laura C. Bowling;Keith A. Cherkauer;Bryan C. Pijanowski

  • Near‐term acceleration of hydroclimatic change in the western U.S.

    Moetasim Ashfaq;Moetasim Ashfaq;Moetasim Ashfaq;Subimal Ghosh;Shih-Chieh Kao;Laura C. Bowling

  • Assessment of land cover change on the hydrology of a Brazilian headwater watershed using the Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model

    L.A. Alvarenga;C.R. de Mello;A. Colombo;L.A. Cuartas

Frequent Co-Authors

Jane Frankenberger
Jane Frankenberger Purdue University West Lafayette
Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of California, Los Angeles
Indrajeet Chaubey
Indrajeet Chaubey University of Connecticut
Eileen J. Kladivko
Eileen J. Kladivko Purdue University West Lafayette
Linda Stalker Prokopy
Linda Stalker Prokopy Purdue University West Lafayette
Moetasim Ashfaq
Moetasim Ashfaq Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Vimal Mishra
Vimal Mishra Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar
Noah S. Diffenbaugh
Noah S. Diffenbaugh Stanford University
Bart Nijssen
Bart Nijssen University of Washington
Jeffrey J. Volenec
Jeffrey J. Volenec Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. An accredited online bachelors in sociology offers insight into societal impacts on the environment, helping professionals address environmental justice and community sustainability.

For educators focusing on environmental issues, pursuing advanced education through online eds to edd programs provides a flexible route to leadership roles in environmental education and policy development.

Social work intertwines with environmental science by addressing human well-being within ecological contexts. The availability of online dsw programs in social work expands opportunities for professionals aiming to integrate social and environmental support systems.

Additionally, those seeking terminal degrees without lengthy research components may consider online edd programs no dissertation. These programs provide practical expertise suitable for advancing careers in environmental education and administration.

Best Scientists Citing Laura C. Bowling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles