World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
3551
World Ranking
8125
National Ranking
24

Lajos Vörös publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lajos Vörös sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 111 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Lajos Vörös D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lajos Vörös sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lajos Vörös is affiliated with the Balaton Limnological Institute in Hungary. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a strong emphasis on aquatic ecosystems and related ecological processes.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Environmental Science

Within this broader field, Vörös's subfields of study cover:

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Oceanography
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Molecular Biology

Their research interests span several key topics, particularly:

  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Among recent notable publications authored or co-authored by Vörös are:

  • Photosynthesis Monitoring in Microalgae Cultures Grown on Municipal Wastewater as a Nutrient Source in Large-Scale Outdoor Bioreactors, 2022, Biology
  • Oligotrophication of Lake Balaton over a 20-year period and its implications for the relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass, 2020, Hydrobiologia
  • Photoautotrophic picoplankton - a review on their occurrence, role and diversity in Lake Balaton, 2020, Biologia Futura
  • Planktonic and Benthic Bacterial Communities of the Largest Central European Shallow Lake, Lake Balaton and Its Main Inflow Zala River, 2020, Current Microbiology
  • Extreme guanotrophication by phosphorus in contradiction with the productivity of alkaline soda pan ecosystems, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Vörös include:

  • Boglárka Somogyi
  • Emil Boros
  • Tamás Felföldi
  • Gábor Bernát
  • László Tóth

They have published multiple articles in several venues, highlighting their active engagement with the scientific community. The frequently appearing publication venues are:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Biology
  • Hydrobiologia

Best Publications

  • Colourful coexistence of red and green picocyanobacteria in lakes and seas

    Maayke Stomp;Jef Huisman;Lajos Vörös;Frances R. Pick

  • Freshwater picocyanobacteria along a trophic gradient and light quality range

    Lajos Vörös;Cristiana Callieri;Katalin V.-Balogh;Roberto Bertoni

  • Phytoplankton biomass and chlorophyll-a in some shallow lakes in central Europe

    Lajos Vörös;Judit Padisák

  • Nitrogen fixation, ammonium and nitrate uptake during a bloom of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii in Lake Balaton

    Mátyás Présing;Sándor Herodek;Lajos Vörös;István Kóbor

  • Combating cyanobacterial proliferation by avoiding or treating inflows with high P load—experiences from eight case studies

    Jutta Fastner;Sally Abella;Arni Litt;Giuseppe Morabito

  • Occurrence, Dynamics and Production of Picoplankton in Hungarian Shallow Lakes

    Lajos Vörös;Pál Gulyás;József Németh

  • Freshwater picocyanobacteria along a trophic gradient and light quality range

    Unknown

  • Size-selective filtration and taxon-specific digestion of plankton algae by silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix Val.)

    Lajos Vörös;Imre Oldal;Mátyás Présing;Katalin V.-Balogh

  • Nitrogen uptake and the importance of internal nitrogen loading in Lake Balaton

    Matyas Presing;Sandor Herodek;T. O. M. Preston;Lajos Vörös

  • Phytoplankton dynamics in relation to connectivity, flow dynamics and resource availability—the case of a large, lowland river, the Hungarian Tisza

    Vera Istvánovics;Vera Istvánovics;Márk Honti;Lajos Vörös;Zsolt Kozma

  • Opposing patterns of zooplankton diversity and functioning along a natural stress gradient: when the going gets tough, the tough get going

    Zsófia Horváth;Csaba F. Vad;Adrienn Tóth;Katalin Zsuga

  • Specific attenuation coefficients of optically active substances and their contribution to the underwater ultraviolet and visible light climate in shallow lakes and ponds

    Katalin V.-Balogh;Balázs Németh;Lajos Vörös

  • Factors effecting growth and cell composition of cyanoprokaryote Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Wołoszyńska) Seenayya et Subba Raju

    Hesham M. Shafik;Sandor Herodek;Matyas Presing;Lajos Vörös

  • Seasonal Dynamics of Picocyanobacteria and Picoeukaryotes in a Large Shallow Lake (Lake Balaton, Hungary)

    Andrea Mózes;Mátyás Présing;Lajos Vörös

  • Characterization of photoautotrophic picoplankton assemblages in turbid, alkaline lakes of the Carpathian Basin (Central Europe)

    Tamás Felföldi;Boglárka Somogyi;Károly Márialigeti;Lajos Vörös

  • THE EFFECT OF AQUATIC BIRDS ON THE NUTRIENT LOAD AND WATER QUALITY OF SODA PANS IN HUNGARY

    Emil Boros;Tamás Nagy;Csaba Pigniczki;László Kotymán

  • Fluorometric Characterization of Two Picocyanobacteria Strains from Lakes of Different Underwater Light Quality

    Cristiana Callieri;Enrica Amicucci;Roberto Bertoni;Lajos Vörös

  • A five-year study of autotrophic winter picoplankton in Lake Balaton, Hungary

    Lajos Vörös;Andrea Mózes;Boglárka Somogyi

  • Multiple extreme environmental conditions of intermittent soda pans in the Carpathian Basin (Central Europe).

    Emil Boros;Katalin V.-Balogh;Lajos Vörös;Zsófia Horváth

  • Insect (Locusta migratoria migratorioides) test monitoring the toxicity of cyanobacteria

    L Hiripi;L Nagy;T Kalmár;A Kovács

  • Soda pans of the Pannonian steppe harbor unique bacterial communities adapted to multiple extreme conditions

    Attila Szabó;Kristóf Korponai;Csaba Kerepesi;Boglárka Somogyi

  • The keystone role of anostracans and copepods in European soda pans during the spring migration of waterbirds

    Zsófia Horváth;Csaba F. Vad;Lajos Vörös;Emil Boros

  • Winter bloom of picoeukaryotes in Hungarian shallow turbid soda pans and the role of light and temperature

    Boglárka Somogyi;Tamás Felföldi;József Vanyovszki;Ákos Ágyi

  • Growth of Cyclotella meneghiniana Kutz. I. Effects of temperature, light and low rate of nutrient supply

    H. M. Shafik;H. M. Shafik;S. Herodek;L. Vörös;M. Présing

Frequent Co-Authors

Ondřej Prášil
Ondřej Prášil Institute of Microbiology
Katalin Solymosi
Katalin Solymosi Eötvös Loránd University
Judit Padisák
Judit Padisák University of Pannonia
Cristiana Callieri
Cristiana Callieri Water Research Institute
Attila Szabo
Attila Szabo Eötvös Loránd University
Zoltán Botta-Dukát
Zoltán Botta-Dukát Institute of Ecology and Botany
Tibor Erős
Tibor Erős Balaton Limnological Institute
Lucas J. Stal
Lucas J. Stal University of Amsterdam
Dietmar Straile
Dietmar Straile University of Konstanz
Linda May
Linda May Natural Environment Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in a career that supports ecology and evolution—such as healthcare, education, or environmental policy—online degrees can offer a flexible path. Comparing options, like the capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn programs, helps prospective students understand the differences in curriculum, cost, and support for various professional goals.

Affordability is another key factor. Students focused on practical career progression might explore the cheapest bsn to msn online programs to find budget-friendly bridges for advancement.

In addition, choosing reputable institutions—such as non profit online universities—can ensure quality and recognition for your degree. These schools typically prioritize student outcomes and often provide robust academic support.

Lastly, for military members and veterans, selecting online military friendly colleges may deliver tailored resources and flexible scheduling, easing the transition to civilian careers in scientific or allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing Lajos Vörös

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles