World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Khabat Khosravi

Khabat Khosravi

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 52 4449 4258 16 16 132 11080

Khabat Khosravi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Khabat Khosravi between 2012 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Khabat Khosravi published across 15 years, from 2012 to 2026, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2019. 14 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2019. 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
2012 2026

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Khabat Khosravi: publications per year, 2012 to 2026
Year Publications
2012 1
2013 2
2014 1
2015 1
2016 2
2017 6
2018 10
2019 27
2020 17
2021 20
2022 16
2023 7
2024 17
2025 13
2026 1
Total 141
Download as CSV

Khabat Khosravi publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Khabat Khosravi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 132 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 132
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Khabat Khosravi D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Khabat Khosravi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266 52
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran.

    Khabat Khosravi;Binh Thai Pham;Kamran Chapi;Ataollah Shirzadi

  • A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods

    Khabat Khosravi;Himan Shahabi;Binh Thai Pham;Jan Adamowski

  • A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment

    Kamran Chapi;Vijay P. Singh;Ataollah Shirzadi;Himan Shahabi

  • Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan

    Jie Dou;Ali P. Yunus;Dieu Tien Bui;Abdelaziz Merghadi

  • A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique

    Khabat Khosravi;Ebrahim Nohani;Edris Maroufinia;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi

  • Improving prediction of water quality indices using novel hybrid machine-learning algorithms.

    Duie Tien Bui;Khabat Khosravi;John Tiefenbacher;Hoang Nguyen

  • Flood Detection and Susceptibility Mapping Using Sentinel-1 Remote Sensing Data and a Machine Learning Approach: Hybrid Intelligence of Bagging Ensemble Based on K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier

    Himan Shahabi;Ataollah Shirzadi;Kayvan Ghaderi;Ebrahim Omidvar

  • Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran

    Phuong Thao Thi Ngo;Mahdi Panahi;Khabat Khosravi;Omid Ghorbanzadeh

  • Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon ' s entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models.

    Khabat Khosravi;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Kamran Chapi;Masoumeh Bahri

  • Convolutional neural network (CNN) with metaheuristic optimization algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping in Icheon, South Korea.

    Unknown

  • Flood susceptibility mapping in Dingnan County (China) using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with biogeography based optimization and imperialistic competitive algorithm.

    Yi Wang;Haoyuan Hong;Haoyuan Hong;Wei Chen;Shaojun Li

  • New Hybrids of ANFIS with Several Optimization Algorithms for Flood Susceptibility Modeling

    Dieu Tien Bui;Khabat Khosravi;Shaojun Li;Himan Shahabi

  • Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Different GIS-Based Bivariate Models

    Ebrahim Nohani;Meisam Moharrami;Samira Sharafi;Khabat Khosravi

  • A comparison study of DRASTIC methods with various objective methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment.

    Khabat Khosravi;Majid Sartaj;Frank T.-C. Tsai;Vijay P. Singh

  • Flood Spatial Modeling in Northern Iran Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Comparison between Evidential Belief Functions and Its Ensemble with a Multivariate Logistic Regression Model

    Dieu Tien Bui;Khabat Khosravi;Himan Shahabi;Prasad Daggupati

  • Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using ANFIS ensembled with teaching-learning-based and biogeography-based optimization

    Wei Chen;Wei Chen;Mahdi Panahi;Khabat Khosravi;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi

  • Novel GIS Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping.

    Ataollah Shirzadi;Karim Soliamani;Mahmood Habibnejhad;Ataollah Kavian

  • Convolutional neural network approach for spatial prediction of flood hazard at national scale of Iran

    Khabat Khosravi;Mahdi Panahi;Ali Golkarian;Saskia D. Keesstra;Saskia D. Keesstra

  • Novel Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms for Spatial Prediction of Floods

    Dieu Tien Bui;Mahdi Panahi;Himan Shahabi;Vijay P. Singh

  • Spatial prediction of groundwater spring potential mapping based on an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic optimization

    Khabat Khosravi;Mahdi Panahi;Dieu Tien Bui

Frequent Co-Authors

Prasad Daggupati
Prasad Daggupati University of Guelph
Luca Mao
Luca Mao University of Lincoln
Zaher Mundher Yaseen
Zaher Mundher Yaseen King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Dieu Tien Bui
Dieu Tien Bui University of South-Eastern Norway
Baharin Bin Ahmad
Baharin Bin Ahmad University of Technology Malaysia
Himan Shahabi
Himan Shahabi University of Kurdistan
Ataollah Shirzadi
Ataollah Shirzadi University of Kurdistan
Micòl Mastrocicco
Micòl Mastrocicco University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Sinan Q. Salih
Sinan Q. Salih IEEE Computer Society
Nadhir Al-Ansari
Nadhir Al-Ansari Luleå University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which can be further enhanced through various online degree programs. For educators in the field, pursuing eds to edd bridge programs online offers a seamless transition from a master’s to a doctoral level, helping professionals advance in academic or leadership roles.

Those interested in the social implications of environmental issues may consider online degrees such as online dsw programs in social work. These programs equip graduates to address community health and social justice challenges impacted by environmental factors.

For students seeking flexibility, most affordable online general studies degree programs provide a broad educational foundation while allowing for a focus on environmental topics through electives or minors.

Additionally, if balancing workload and earning a degree quickly is a priority, exploring the easiest bachelor's degree options can help prospective students identify programs that align with their personal strengths and schedules, setting a strong base for further specialization in Environmental Sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Khabat Khosravi

Recently Published Articles