World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kenneth H. Reckhow

Kenneth H. Reckhow

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
8789
World Ranking
5534
National Ranking
2023

Kenneth H. Reckhow publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth H. Reckhow sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Kenneth H. Reckhow D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth H. Reckhow sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth H. Reckhow is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research collaborations include work with several frequent co-authors, reflecting a network of professional connections within the academic community.

  • Graham P. Harris
  • Seth W. Bigelow (count: 1)
  • Jonathan J. Cole (count: 1)
  • Hélène Cyr (count: 1)
  • Lorraine L. Janus (count: 1)

Reckhow's academic output and contributions cover various research topics, although specific details about fields of study, publication venues, and main topics of work are not explicitly listed in the available data.

The absence of detailed information on recent papers, awards, and book publications makes it difficult to provide a more granular account of their research focus or disciplinary impact.

Overall, Reckhow's academic profile is characterized by affiliation with a prominent institution and collaborative ties to multiple researchers, indicating active engagement in scholarly activities within their field.

Best Publications

  • A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis

    Mark E Borsuk;Craig A Stow;Kenneth H Reckhow

  • An Examination of Land-Use - Nutrient Export Relationships

    Michael N. Beaulac;Kenneth H. Reckhow

  • Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling

    George B. Arhonditsis;Michael T. Brett

  • Engineering Approaches for Lake Management, Volume 2: Mechanistic Modeling

    Kenneth Reckhow;SC Chapra

  • Statistical Issues for Monitoring Ecological and Natural Resources in the United States

    Anthony R. Olsen;Joseph Sedransk;Don Edwards;Carol A. Gotway

  • Water quality simulation modeling and uncertainty analysis for risk assessment and decision making

    Kenneth H. Reckhow

  • Water quality prediction and probability network models

    Kenneth H Reckhow

  • Engineering approaches for lake management

    Kenneth H. Reckhow;Steven C. Chapra

  • Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis

    GB Arhonditsis;CA Stow;LJ Steinberg;MA Kenney

  • A Procedure Using Modeling and Error Analysis for the Prediction of Lake Phosphorus Concentration from Land Use Information

    K. H. Reckhow;J. T. Simpson

  • A Bayesian hierarchical model to predict benthic oxygen demand from organic matter loading in estuaries and coastal zones

    Mark E. Borsuk;David Higdon;Craig A. Stow;Kenneth H. Reckhow

  • Eutrophication risk assessment using Bayesian calibration of process-based models : application to a mesotrophic lake

    George B. Arhonditsis;Song S. Qian;Craig A. Stow;E. Conrad Lamon

  • On the application of multilevel modeling in environmental and ecological studies

    Song S. Qian;Thomas F. Cuffney;Ibrahim Alameddine;Gerard McMahon

  • Importance of scientific uncertainty in decision making

    Kenneth H. Reckhow

  • Comparison of Estuarine Water Quality Models for Total Maximum Daily Load Development in Neuse River Estuary

    Craig A. Stow;Chris Roessler;Mark E. Borsuk;James D. Bowen

  • Stakeholder values and scientific modeling in the Neuse River watershed

    Mark Borsuk;Robert Clemen;Lynn Maguire;Kenneth Reckhow

  • Engineering Approaches for Lake Management, Volume 1: Data Analysis and Empirical Modeling

    SC Chapra;Kenneth Reckhow

  • Predicting the frequency of water quality standard violations: a probabilistic approach for TMDL development.

    Mark E. Borsuk;Craig A. Stow;Kenneth H. Reckhow

  • COMPILATION OF MEASURED NUTRIENT LOAD DATA FOR AGRICULTURAL LAND USES IN THE UNITED STATES

    Daren Harmel;Steve Potter;Pamela Casebolt;Ken Reckhow

  • Bayesian inference in non-replicated ecological studies

    Kenneth H. Reckhow

  • Integrated approach to total maximum daily load development for Neuse River Estuary using bayesian probability network model (Neu-BERN)

    Mark E. Borsuk;Craig A. Stow;Kenneth H. Reckhow

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig A. Stow
Craig A. Stow National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Steven C. Chapra
Steven C. Chapra Tufts University
George B. Arhonditsis
George B. Arhonditsis University of Toronto
Robert L. Wolpert
Robert L. Wolpert Duke University
Hans W. Paerl
Hans W. Paerl University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Richard Lowrance
Richard Lowrance Agricultural Research Service
James G. Sanders
James G. Sanders University of Georgia
Andrew N. Sharpley
Andrew N. Sharpley University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Walter R. Boynton
Walter R. Boynton University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Mark B. David
Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degree options can broaden career opportunities. Many students seek the most affordable online general studies degree programs to begin their academic journey without significant financial strain. These programs often provide a flexible foundation to tailor studies toward environmental topics.

Those aiming for a smoother educational path might consider some of the easiest degree to get, which can offer a manageable workload while still delivering valuable knowledge. This approach is ideal for balancing studies with other commitments, especially when pursuing interdisciplinary fields connected to the environment.

Specialized degrees like a geoscience online degree allow students to concentrate on earth sciences, vital for understanding environmental processes and natural resource management. Such programs are perfect for those who want technical expertise in analyzing geological data.

Additionally, best GIS programs focus on Geographic Information Systems, equipping students with crucial skills in spatial analysis and mapping. GIS technology plays an increasingly important role in environmental monitoring, planning, and decision-making.

By considering these pathways, prospective students can align their interests with roles that contribute meaningfully to environmental sustainability and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth H. Reckhow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles