World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
8777
World Ranking
5560
National Ranking
470

Kathrin Reetz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathrin Reetz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 228 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kathrin Reetz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathrin Reetz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathrin Reetz is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Their research spans extensive work in the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a principal focus on neurology and cellular and molecular neuroscience. The scientist's publication record highlights significant involvement in studying genetic neurodegenerative diseases and mitochondrial function and pathology, among other key topics related to neurological disorders.

The main fields of study for Kathrin Reetz include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Their research further delves into specialized subfields such as:

  • Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Kathrin Reetz's principal topics of work comprise:

  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

The scientist has been published frequently in several venues, evidencing the scope and focus of their contributions to the field. Key publication venues include:

  • Journal of Neurology
  • Neurological Research and Practice
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Movement Disorders
  • The Cerebellum

Selected recent papers with year and publication venue are:

  • "Long COVID-19: Objectifying most self-reported neurological symptoms," 2022, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • "Neurofilaments in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: blood biomarkers at the preataxic and ataxic stage in humans and mice," 2020, EMBO Molecular Medicine
  • "Structural brain changes in patients with post-COVID fatigue: a prospective observational study," 2023, EClinicalMedicine
  • "Progression characteristics of the European Friedreich's Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies (EFACTS): a 4-year cohort study," 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • "Neurological symptoms in COVID-19: a cross-sectional monocentric study of hospitalized patients," 2021, Neurological Research and Practice

Kathrin Reetz has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, underscoring a network of research partnerships. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Jörg B. Schulz
  • Imis Dogan
  • Sandro Romanzetti
  • Thomas Klockgether
  • Lüdger Schöls

Best Publications

  • Modelling neural correlates of working memory: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.

    Claudia Rottschy;Robert Langner;Robert Langner;Imis Dogan;Kathrin Reetz;Kathrin Reetz

  • Identification of genetic variants associated with Huntington's disease progression: a genome-wide association study

    Davina J Hensman Moss;Antonio F Pardiñas;Douglas Langbehn;Kitty Lo

  • Resting-state connectivity in neurodegenerative disorders: Is there potential for an imaging biomarker?

    Christian Hohenfeld;Cornelius J. Werner;Kathrin Reetz

  • Biological and clinical characteristics of the European Friedreich's Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies (EFACTS) cohort: A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data

    Kathrin Reetz;Imis Dogan;Imis Dogan;Ana S Costa;Manuel Dafotakis

  • The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - A Sensitive Screening Instrument for Detecting Cognitive Impairment in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

    Frances E. Tiffin-Richards;Ana S. Costa;Bernhard Holschbach;Rolf D. Frank

  • Multisensory integration mechanisms during aging.

    Jessica Freiherr;Johan N Lundström;Johan N Lundström;Johan N Lundström;Ute Habel;Kathrin Reetz;Kathrin Reetz

  • Biological and clinical characteristics of individuals at risk for spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 in the longitudinal RISCA study: analysis of baseline data

    Heike Jacobi;Kathrin Reetz;Kathrin Reetz;Sophie Tezenas du Montcel;Peter Bauer

  • Genotype-specific patterns of atrophy progression are more sensitive than clinical decline in SCA1, SCA3 and SCA6

    Kathrin Reetz;Kathrin Reetz;Ana Sofia Costa;Shahram Mirzazade;Shahram Mirzazade;Anna Lehmann;Anna Lehmann

  • Progression characteristics of the European Friedreich’s Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies (EFACTS): a 2 year cohort study

    Kathrin Reetz;Imis Dogan;Ralf-Dieter Hilgers;Paola Giunti

  • Alternate-form reliability of the Montreal cognitive assessment screening test in a clinical setting.

    Ana S Costa;Bruno Fimm;Paul Friesen;Herve Soundjock

  • Altered resting‐state connectivity in Huntington's Disease

    Cornelius J. Werner;Imis Dogan;Imis Dogan;Christian Saß;Shahram Mirzazade;Shahram Mirzazade

  • Cerebral changes improved by physical activity during cognitive decline: A systematic review on MRI studies.

    Alexa Haeger;Ana S. Costa;Jörg B. Schulz;Kathrin Reetz

  • Predominant dystonia with marked cerebellar atrophy A rare phenotype in familial dystonia

    J. Hagenah;K. Reetz;C. Zühlke;A. Rolfs

  • Differentiated parietal connectivity of frontal regions for "what" and "where" memory

    Claudia Rottschy;Svenja Caspers;C Roski;K Reetz

  • Recessively inherited parkinsonism: effect of ATP13A2 mutations on the clinical and neuroimaging phenotype.

    Norbert Brüggemann;Johann Hagenah;Kathrin Reetz;Alexander Schmidt

  • Neurofilaments in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: blood biomarkers at the preataxic and ataxic stage in humans and mice.

    Carlo Wilke;Carlo Wilke;Eva Haas;Kathrin Reetz;Jennifer Faber;Jennifer Faber

  • Brain imaging findings in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) – A systematic review on potential biomarkers for neurodegeneration

    Julia Heller;Nikolina Brcina;Imis Dogan;Florian Holtbernd

  • Morphometric fingerprint of asymptomatic Parkin and PINK1 mutation carriers in the basal ganglia

    F. Binkofski;K. Reetz;C. Gaser;R. Hilker

  • Going beyond the mean: Intraindividual variability of cognitive performance in prodromal and early neurodegenerative disorders

    Ana Sofia Costa;Imis Dogan;Jörg B Schulz;Kathrin Reetz

  • Engineered antibodies: new possibilities for brain PET?

    Dag Sehlin;Stina Syvänen;Benedicte Ballanger;Henryk Barthel

  • Increased brain tissue sodium concentration in Huntington's Disease — A sodium imaging study at 4 T

    Kathrin Reetz;Sandro Romanzetti;Imis Dogan;Christian Saß;Christian Saß

  • FDG PET, Dopamine Transporter SPECT, and Olfaction: Combining Biomarkers in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

    Sanne K Meles;David Vadasz;Remco J Renken;Elisabeth Sittig-Wiegand

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg B. Schulz
Jörg B. Schulz RWTH Aachen University
Ferdinand Binkofski
Ferdinand Binkofski RWTH Aachen University
Simon B. Eickhoff
Simon B. Eickhoff Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Thomas Klockgether
Thomas Klockgether German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Felix Hoffstaedter
Felix Hoffstaedter Forschungszentrum Jülich
Ludger Schöls
Ludger Schöls University of Tübingen
Christine Klein
Christine Klein University of Lübeck
Alexandra Durr
Alexandra Durr Sorbonne University
N. Jon Shah
N. Jon Shah Forschungszentrum Jülich
Karsten Witt
Karsten Witt Kiel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re fascinated by the field of neuroscience, there are several dynamic online study options to consider. Studying neuroscience can open doors to research, healthcare, and technology, but related fields may also offer excellent prospects. Some of the most lucrative college majors include computer science, engineering, and mathematics—disciplines that often complement neuroscience in research and applied settings.

Affordability is a top concern for many prospective students. Choosing an online school that accepts fafsa can help make your neuroscience or related degree more accessible. Additionally, for those seeking to quickly enhance job opportunities, enrolling in online courses with certificates can boost your resume and provide specialized knowledge relevant to in-demand careers.

For students looking to balance challenge with manageability, it's worth exploring the easiest college majors that still align with your interests. Whether you’re pursuing neuroscience directly or a related field, today’s online pathways offer flexible and rewarding career options.

Best Scientists Citing Kathrin Reetz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles