World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
6588
World Ranking
6182
National Ranking
149

Julia Schmale publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Schmale sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 346 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Julia Schmale D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Schmale sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition—Atmosphere

    Unknown

  • Aerosols in current and future Arctic climate

    Julia Schmale;Paul Zieger;Annica M. L. Ekman

  • Frequent new particle formation over the high Arctic pack ice by enhanced iodine emissions.

    Andrea Baccarini;Linn Karlsson;Josef Dommen;Patrick Duplessis

  • Light‐absorbing impurities enhance glacier albedo reduction in the southeastern Tibetan plateau

    Yulan Zhang;Shichang Kang;Shichang Kang;Zhiyuan Cong;Zhiyuan Cong;Julia Schmale

  • Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem

    J. Schmale;S. R. Arnold;Kathy S. Law;T. Thorp

  • Pan-Arctic seasonal cycles and long-term trends of aerosol properties from 10 observatories

    Unknown

  • Long-term cloud condensation nuclei number concentration, particle number size distribution and chemical composition measurements at regionally representative observatories

    Julia Schmale;Silvia Henning;Stefano Decesari;Bas Henzing

  • Overview of the Antarctic circumnavigation expedition: study of preindustrial-like aerosols and their climate effects (ACE-SPACE)

    Julia Schmale;Andrea Baccarini;Iris Thurnherr;Silvia Henning

  • In-situ observations of young contrails - overview and selected results from the CONCERT campaign

    C. Voigt;C. Voigt;U. Schumann;T. Jurkat;D. Schäuble;D. Schäuble

  • Air pollution: Clean up our skies

    Julia Schmale;Drew Shindell;Erika von Schneidemesser;Ilan Chabay

  • Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle and cloud condensation nuclei number, with implications for cloud droplet formation.

    George S. Fanourgakis;Maria Kanakidou;Athanasios Nenes;Athanasios Nenes;Susanne E. Bauer;Susanne E. Bauer

  • Sub-Antarctic marine aerosol: dominant contributions from biogenic sources

    J. Schmale;J. Schneider;E. Nemitz;Y. S. Tang

  • Annual cycle observations of aerosols capable of ice formation in central Arctic clouds

    Unknown

  • Equal abundance of summertime natural and wintertime anthropogenic Arctic organic aerosols

    Unknown

  • The global aerosol synthesis and science project (GASSP): Measurements and modeling to reduce uncertainty

    C.L. Reddington;K.S. Carslaw;P. Stier;N. Schutgens

  • A central arctic extreme aerosol event triggered by a warm air-mass intrusion

    Unknown

  • Modulation of snow reflectance and snowmelt from Central Asian glaciers by anthropogenic black carbon

    Julia Schmale;Julia Schmale;Mark Flanner;Shichang Kang;Michael Sprenger

  • Variation of ice nucleating particles in the European Arctic over the last centuries

    M. Hartmann;T. Blunier;Sandra O. Brügger;Sandra O. Brügger;J. Schmale

  • Ship-based measurements of ice nuclei concentrations over the Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Southern oceans

    André Welti;André Welti;E. Keith Bigg;Paul J. DeMott;Xianda Gong

  • Collocated observations of cloud condensation nuclei, particle size distributions, and chemical composition.

    Julia Schmale;Silvia Henning;Bas Henzing;Helmi Keskinen

Frequent Co-Authors

Urs Baltensperger
Urs Baltensperger Paul Scherrer Institute
Kenneth S. Carslaw
Kenneth S. Carslaw University of Leeds
Kathy S. Law
Kathy S. Law Université Paris Cité
Martin Gysel
Martin Gysel Paul Scherrer Institute
Andreas Stohl
Andreas Stohl University of Vienna
Josef Dommen
Josef Dommen Paul Scherrer Institute
Athanasios Nenes
Athanasios Nenes École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Gérard Ancellet
Gérard Ancellet Sorbonne University
Johannes Schneider
Johannes Schneider Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Steve R. Arnold
Steve R. Arnold University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences often leads students to explore related fields and flexible learning options, especially through online programs. For educators or professionals seeking leadership roles, exploring the best online eds to edd programs can provide advanced credentials while maintaining a career trajectory in education and environmental policy.

For those interested in integrating social work with environmental advocacy, affordable options like the cheapest dsw program offer practical pathways to support communities affected by environmental challenges.

Students starting out or seeking a broad foundation can consider a budget friendly online general studies degree, which allows the flexibility to tailor courses in ecology, sustainability, and related disciplines before specializing.

For individuals aiming for a quicker transition into the workforce, understanding the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify streamlined programs that still offer valuable skills for entry-level roles in environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Julia Schmale

Recently Published Articles