World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 39 9833 9552 126 126 320 5773

Joo-Hwee Lim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joo-Hwee Lim between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joo-Hwee Lim published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2010. 13 of the 338 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2010. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
1991 2025

338 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joo-Hwee Lim: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 3
2000 3
2001 2
2002 6
2003 12
2004 9
2005 15
2006 14
2007 16
2008 21
2009 27
2010 30
2011 15
2012 11
2013 9
2014 12
2015 9
2016 8
2017 12
2018 14
2019 16
2020 9
2021 17
2022 16
2023 13
2024 8
2025 5
Total 338
Download as CSV

Joo-Hwee Lim publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joo-Hwee Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 312–321 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 320 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238 320
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Joo-Hwee Lim D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joo-Hwee Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 39
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joo-Hwee Lim is affiliated with the Agency for Science, Technology and Research in Singapore. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Civil and Structural Engineering.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques, Human Pose and Action Recognition, Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Video Analysis and Summarization, Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction, and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques.

Recent publications by Joo-Hwee Lim include:

  • A novel hybrid approach for crack detection, 2020, Pattern Recognition
  • Semantically consistent text to fashion image synthesis with an enhanced attentional generative adversarial network, 2020, Pattern Recognition Letters
  • Enhancing Representation Learning With Spatial Transformation and Early Convolution for Reinforcement Learning-Based Small Object Detection, 2023, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
  • Learning by Imagination: A Joint Framework for Text-Based Image Manipulation and Change Captioning, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • Entropy guided attention network for weakly-supervised action localization, 2022, Pattern Recognition

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Joo-Hwee Lim include:

  • Qianli Xu
  • Fen Fang
  • Hanwang Zhang
  • Ying Sun
  • Liyuan Li

The scientist's work has appeared prominently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pattern Recognition, and IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

Best Publications

  • Level-set based automatic cup-to-disc ratio determination using retinal fundus images in ARGALI

    D. W. K. Wong;J. Liu;J.H. Lim;X. Jia

  • Automatic Optic Disc Detection From Retinal Images by a Line Operator

    Shijian Lu;Joo Hwee Lim

  • A novel hybrid approach for crack detection

    Fen Fang;Liyuan Li;Ying Gu;Hongyuan Zhu

  • Home photo content modeling for personalized event-based retrieval

    Joo-Hwee Lim;Qi Tian;P. Mulhem

  • Learning Attribute Representations with Localization for Flexible Fashion Search

    Kenan E. Ak;Ashraf A. Kassim;Joo Hwee Lim;Jo Yew Tham

  • Insertion of additional content into video

    Wan Kong Wah;Xu Changsheng;Lim Joo Hwee;Yu Xinguo

  • Summarization of Egocentric Videos: A Comprehensive Survey

    Ana Garcia del Molino;Cheston Tan;Joo-Hwee Lim;Ah-Hwee Tan

  • DehazeGAN: When Image Dehazing Meets Differential Programming

    Hongyuan Zhu;Xi Peng;Vijay Chandrasekhar;Liyuan Li

  • Learning Deep Hierarchical Visual Feature Coding

    Hanlin Goh;Nicolas Thome;Matthieu Cord;Joo-Hwee Lim

  • Scene text extraction based on edges and support vector regression

    Shijian Lu;Tao Chen;Shangxuan Tian;Joo-Hwee Lim

  • Automated Layer Segmentation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images

    Shijian Lu;Carol Yim-lui Cheung;Jiang Liu;Joo Hwee Lim

  • Method and system for event detection in a video stream

    Changsheng Xu;Kongwah Wan;Yiqun Li;Qi Tian

  • Deep Future Gaze: Gaze Anticipation on Egocentric Videos Using Adversarial Networks

    Mengmi Zhang;Keng Teck Ma;Joo Hwee Lim;Qi Zhao

  • Latent semantic fusion model for image retrieval and annotation

    Unknown

  • Automated detection of kinks from blood vessels for optic cup segmentation in retinal images

    D. W. K. Wong;J. Liu;J. H. Lim;Haizhou Li

  • A Computer-Aided Diagnosis System of Nuclear Cataract

    Huiqi Li;Joo Hwee Lim;Jiang Liu;Paul Mitchell

  • ARGALI: An Automatic Cup-to-Disc Ratio Measurement System for Glaucoma Analysis Using Level-set Image Processing

    J. Liu;D. W. K. Wong;J. H. Lim;H. Li

  • Automatic video event detection and indexing

    Joo Hwee Lim;Changsheng Xu;Kong Wah Wan;Qi Tian

  • Multimodal Multi-Stream Deep Learning for Egocentric Activity Recognition

    Sibo Song;Vijay Chandrasekhar;Bappaditya Mandal;Liyuan Li

  • Combining Faster R-CNN and Model-Driven Clustering for Elongated Object Detection

    Fen Fang;Liyuan Li;Hongyuan Zhu;Joo-Hwee Lim

  • Similarity Learning for Nearest Neighbor Classification

    A.M. Qamar;E. Gaussier;J.-P. Chevallet;Joo Hwee Lim

  • Robust and Efficient Saliency Modeling from Image Co-Occurrence Histograms

    Shijian Lu;Cheston Tan;Joo-Hwee Lim

  • Attribute Manipulation Generative Adversarial Networks for Fashion Images

    Kenan Ak;Ashraf Kassim;Joo-Hwee Lim;Jo Yew Tham

  • Singe Image Rain Removal with Unpaired Information: A Differentiable Programming Perspective

    Hongyuan Zhu;Xi Peng;Joey Tianyi Zhou;Songfan Yang

  • Optic cup and disk extraction from retinal fundus images for determination of cup-to-disc ratio

    J. Liu;D.W.K. Wong;J.H. Lim;X. Jia

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiang Liu
Jiang Liu Southern University of Science and Technology
Tien Yin Wong
Tien Yin Wong Tsinghua University
Shijian Lu
Shijian Lu Nanyang Technological University
Damon Wing Kee Wong
Damon Wing Kee Wong Nanyang Technological University
Sim Heng Ong
Sim Heng Ong National University of Singapore
Jiashi Feng
Jiashi Feng ByteDance
Qi Tian
Qi Tian Huawei Technologies (China)
Haizhou Li
Haizhou Li Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Ah-Hwee Tan
Ah-Hwee Tan Singapore Management University
Ashraf A. Kassim
Ashraf A. Kassim National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science doesn’t just mean pursuing a traditional bachelor’s program. There are many flexible and rewarding online options to help you launch or advance your tech career. For those seeking a quick boost, certificate programs that pay well can help you gain high-demand skills in months, not years. These fast-tracked credentials are especially useful for career changers or professionals who want to upskill without the commitment of a full degree.

If you want to take your education further, consider enrolling in the shortest online masters degree programs, designed for rapid completion and immediate career impact. Many of the most in demand masters degrees are available online, focusing on areas like data science, cybersecurity, and software development.

Alternatively, getting an associate's degree online is a great entry point, offering foundational knowledge and job-ready skills. This pathway can save you time and money, and it often leads directly into computer science roles or further study. Whichever path you choose, online education provides the flexibility to balance your studies with work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Joo-Hwee Lim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles