World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
8231
World Ranking
9616
National Ranking
123

Damon Wing Kee Wong publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Damon Wing Kee Wong sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 190 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Damon Wing Kee Wong D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Damon Wing Kee Wong sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Damon Wing Kee Wong is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. Their research primarily addresses medical fields with a strong focus on ophthalmology and imaging technologies.

The scientist's publication record includes works across multiple high-impact journals covering ophthalmic research, imaging technology, and related biomedical applications.

Selected recent papers include:

  • Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Quantitative Microvascular Analysis With Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Eyes With Diabetic Retinopathy, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Retinal Neurovascular Coupling in Diabetes, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Predicting glaucoma progression using deep learning framework guided by generative algorithm, 2023, Scientific Reports
  • Are choriocapillaris flow void features robust to diurnal variations? A swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) study, 2020, Scientific Reports

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Leopold Schmetterer
  • Jacqueline Chua
  • Bingyao Tan
  • Xinwen Yao
  • Gerhard Garhöfer

The scientist's work is published most often in venues such as:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Acta Ophthalmologica
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

The primary fields of study for Wong include medicine, with specific engagement in ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and cardiovascular medicine.

Key subfields are:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Epidemiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Main research topics investigated comprise:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Best Publications

  • Joint Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation Based on Multi-Label Deep Network and Polar Transformation

    Huazhu Fu;Jun Cheng;Yanwu Xu;Damon Wing Kee Wong

  • Superpixel Classification Based Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation for Glaucoma Screening

    Jun Cheng;Jiang Liu;Yanwu Xu;Fengshou Yin

  • DeepVessel: Retinal Vessel Segmentation via Deep Learning and Conditional Random Field

    Huazhu Fu;Yanwu Xu;Stephen Lin;Damon Wing Kee Wong

  • Disc-Aware Ensemble Network for Glaucoma Screening From Fundus Image

    Huazhu Fu;Jun Cheng;Yanwu Xu;Changqing Zhang

  • Glaucoma detection based on deep convolutional neural network

    Xiangyu Chen;Yanwu Xu;Damon Wing Kee Wong;Tien Yin Wong

  • Retinal vessel segmentation via deep learning network and fully-connected conditional random fields

    Huazhu Fu;Yanwu Xu;Damon Wing Kee Wong;Jiang Liu

  • Level-set based automatic cup-to-disc ratio determination using retinal fundus images in ARGALI

    D. W. K. Wong;J. Liu;J.H. Lim;X. Jia

  • Validating retinal fundus image analysis algorithms: issues and a proposal.

    Emanuele Trucco;Alfredo Ruggeri;Thomas Karnowski;Luca Giancardo

  • Automatic Feature Learning for Glaucoma Detection Based on Deep Learning

    Xiangyu Chen;Yanwu Xu;Shuicheng Yan;Damon Wing Kee Wong

  • Automated segmentation of optic disc and optic cup in fundus images for glaucoma diagnosis

    Fengshou Yin;Jiang Liu;Damon Wing Kee Wong;Ngan Meng Tan

  • Model-based optic nerve head segmentation on retinal fundus images

    Fengshou Yin;Jiang Liu;Sim Heng Ong;Ying Sun

  • Automatic optic disc segmentation with peripapillary atrophy elimination

    Jun Cheng;Jiang Liu;Damon Wing Kee Wong;Fengshou Yin

  • A survey on computer aided diagnosis for ocular diseases

    Zhuo Zhang;Zhuo Zhang;Ruchir Srivastava;Huiying Liu;Xiangyu Chen

  • Segmentation and Quantification for Angle-Closure Glaucoma Assessment in Anterior Segment OCT

    Huazhu Fu;Yanwu Xu;Stephen Lin;Xiaoqin Zhang

  • Sparse Dissimilarity-Constrained Coding for Glaucoma Screening

    Jun Cheng;Fengshou Yin;Damon Wing Kee Wong;Dacheng Tao

  • Automated detection of kinks from blood vessels for optic cup segmentation in retinal images

    D. W. K. Wong;J. Liu;J. H. Lim;Haizhou Li

  • ARGALI: An Automatic Cup-to-Disc Ratio Measurement System for Glaucoma Analysis Using Level-set Image Processing

    J. Liu;D. W. K. Wong;J. H. Lim;H. Li

  • Optic Cup Segmentation for Glaucoma Detection Using Low-Rank Superpixel Representation

    Yanwu Xu;Lixin Duan;Stephen Lin;Xiangyu Chen

  • Detecting retinal microaneurysms and hemorrhages with robustness to the presence of blood vessels

    Ruchir Srivastava;Lixin Duan;Damon W.K. Wong;Jiang Liu

  • Integrating holistic and local deep features for glaucoma classification

    Annan Li;Jun Cheng;Damon Wing Kee Wong;Jiang Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiang Liu
Jiang Liu Southern University of Science and Technology
Tien Yin Wong
Tien Yin Wong Tsinghua University
Jun Cheng
Jun Cheng University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yanwu Xu
Yanwu Xu South China University of Technology
Tin Aung
Tin Aung National University of Singapore
Joo-Hwee Lim
Joo-Hwee Lim Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Huazhu Fu
Huazhu Fu Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Leopold Schmetterer
Leopold Schmetterer Nanyang Technological University
Carol Y. Cheung
Carol Y. Cheung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Ching-Yu Cheng
Ching-Yu Cheng National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a wide variety of academic and career options—many of which can be pursued 100% online. For those seeking the highest level of academic achievement without breaking the bank, affordable phd programs online are becoming increasingly popular, offering flexibility and cost savings.

Professionals interested in education technology or academic leadership may consider a cheapest edd pathway. These accelerated options can significantly shorten the time to graduation, helping you reach your goals faster.

For those who prefer to enter the workforce quickly, an accelerated associate degree in IT or business can be earned in as little as six months. This provides a convenient bridge into entry-level tech positions or further undergraduate studies.

Looking to expand your skill set or transition to a business-focused role? Consider one of the cheapest online business degree programs available, which can complement your computer science expertise and broaden your career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Damon Wing Kee Wong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles