World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
20242
World Ranking
19132
National Ranking
9538

Jon M. Burch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon M. Burch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 137 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jon M. Burch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon M. Burch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon M. Burch is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. This affiliation situates them within a research environment known for medical and health sciences, although specific details regarding their scientific contributions, research topics, or publications are not provided.

There are no records of recent papers authored by Jon M. Burch, and no information is available about frequent co-authors or regular publication venues. Additionally, there are no documented book publications or details concerning the number of books published under their authorship.

The source data does not list main fields or subfields of study associated with Jon M. Burch's research activities. Similarly, there are no main topics of work recorded that would provide further insight into their specific scientific focus or thematic areas of interest.

There is also no information regarding any awards or honors received by Jon M. Burch, nor any citations recognizing individual achievements or contributions to their field.

Overall, the available data provides a basic institutional affiliation but does not include detailed information related to scholarly output, research themes, collaborations, or accolades for Jon M. Burch.

Best Publications

  • THE ABDOMINAL COMPARTMENT SYNDROME

    Jon M. Burch;Ernest E. Moore;Frederick A. Moore;Reginald Franciose

  • Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidoses revisited.

    Ned Cosgriff;Ernest E. Moore;Angela Sauaia;Mary Kenny-Moynihan

  • Prospective characterization and selective management of the abdominal compartment syndrome.

    Daniel R. Meldrum;Frederick A. Moore;Ernest E. Moore;Reginald J. Franciose

  • Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale.

    Walter L. Biffl;Ernest E. Moore;Patrick J. Offner;Kerry E. Brega

  • Abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients.

    Jon M. Burch;Victor B. Ortiz;Robert J. Richardson;R. Russell Martin

  • Postinjury multiple organ failure: a bimodal phenomenon.

    Frederick A. Moore;Angela Sauaia;Ernest E. Moore;James B. Haenel

  • Prehospital hypertonic saline/dextran infusion for post-traumatic hypotension. The U.S.A. Multicenter Trial.

    Kenneth L. Mattox;Kenneth L. Mattox;Peter A. Maningas;Ernest E. Moore;James R. Mateer

  • Treatment-Related Outcomes From Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Importance of Routine Follow-Up Arteriography

    Walter L. Biffl;Charles E. Ray;Ernest E. Moore;Reginald J. Franciose

  • The Unrecognized Epidemic of Blunt Carotid Arterial Injuries: Early Diagnosis Improves Neurologic Outcome

    Walter L. Biffl;Ernest E. Moore;Robert K. Ryu;Patrick J. Offner

  • The devastating potential of blunt vertebral arterial injuries.

    Walter L. Biffl;Ernest E. Moore;J. Paul Elliott;Charles E. Ray

  • The first randomized trial of human polymerized hemoglobin as a blood substitute in acute trauma and emergent surgery

    Steven A Gould;Ernest E Moore;David B Hoyt;Jon M Burch

  • Five thousand seven hundred sixty cardiovascular injuries in 4459 patients. Epidemiologic evolution 1958 to 1987.

    Kenneth L. Mattox;David V. Feliciano;J. Burch;A. C. Beall

  • Evolution of a Multidisciplinary Clinical Pathway for the Management of Unstable Patients With Pelvic Fractures

    Walter L. Biffl;Wade R. Smith;Ernest E. Moore;Ricardo J. Gonzalez

  • Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate.

    C. Clay Cothren;Ernest E. Moore;Walter L. Biffl;David J. Ciesla

  • Optimizing screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries

    Walter L. Biffl;Ernest E. Moore;Patrick J. Offner;Kerry E. Brega

  • Staged Physiologic Restoration and Damage Control Surgery

    Ernest E. Moore;Jon M. Burch;Reginald J. Franciose;Patrick J. Offner

  • The abdominal compartment syndrome is a morbid complication of postinjury damage control surgery

    Christopher D Raeburn;Ernest E Moore;Walter L Biffl;Jeffrey L Johnson

  • A 12-Year Prospective Study of Postinjury Multiple Organ Failure: Has Anything Changed?

    David J. Ciesla;Ernest E. Moore;Jeffrey L. Johnson;Jon M. Burch

  • Packing for control of hepatic hemorrhage.

    David V. Feliciano;Kenneth L. Mattox;Jon M. Burch;Carmel G. Bitondo

  • Noninvasive diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injuries: a preliminary report.

    Walter L. Biffl;Charles E. Ray;Ernest E. Moore;Michael Mestek

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernest E. Moore
Ernest E. Moore University of Colorado Denver
Kenneth L. Mattox
Kenneth L. Mattox Baylor College of Medicine
David V. Feliciano
David V. Feliciano Emory University
Jeffrey L. Johnson
Jeffrey L. Johnson LAC+USC Medical Center
Walter L. Biffl
Walter L. Biffl University of California, Irvine
Frederick A. Moore
Frederick A. Moore University of Florida
Kamal M.F. Itani
Kamal M.F. Itani Boston University
Daniel R. Meldrum
Daniel R. Meldrum University of Florida
Thomas N. Robinson
Thomas N. Robinson University of Colorado Denver
Michael E. DeBakey
Michael E. DeBakey Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in medicine but prefer flexible study options, there are numerous online degree pathways available. For nurses looking to advance, dnp online programs offer advanced practice expertise in a shorter timeframe. These programs are ideal for registered nurses aiming to move into leadership, research, or education roles while balancing work and study.

Many professionals seek out dnp programs that are known for their accessibility and support. These options often have less stringent admission requirements or a more manageable curriculum, making them attractive for working professionals or those new to graduate studies.

If you're starting with minimal healthcare experience, online lpn programs can help you quickly begin a nursing career. These fast-track options are designed for individuals wanting to enter the workforce sooner while still receiving comprehensive training.

For those interested in mental health, accelerated msn psychiatric np programs provide a route to becoming a nurse practitioner specializing in psychiatric and mental health services. These condensed programs enable faster career advancement to meet the growing need for mental health professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Jon M. Burch

Recently Published Articles