World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
10528
World Ranking
6604
National Ranking
3585

Jon D. Kassel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon D. Kassel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jon D. Kassel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon D. Kassel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon D. Kassel is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their academic profile currently reflects a focus on research activity connected to this institution.

The available data does not list recent papers, frequent co-authors, or main fields and subfields of study associated with their work. No publication venues, topics of work, book publications, or awards have been recorded at this time.

Due to the absence of detailed information on publications or specific research areas, a more granular overview of their scientific contributions cannot be provided. This limits the scope for analysis of their research focus or collaborative networks.

Jon D. Kassel is an active researcher and is not listed as deceased.

Best Publications

  • Smoking, stress, and negative affect: correlation, causation, and context across stages of smoking

    Jon D. Kassel;Laura R. Stroud;Carol A. Paronis

  • Adult attachment security and symptoms of depression: the mediating roles of dysfunctional attitudes and low self-esteem.

    John E. Roberts;Ian H. Gotlib;Jon D. Kassel

  • Immediate antecedents of cigarette smoking: An analysis from ecological momentary assessment.

    Saul Shiffman;Chad J. Gwaltney;Mark H. Balabanis;Kenneth S. Liu

  • Remember that? A comparison of real-time versus retrospective recall of smoking lapses.

    Saul Shiffman;Michael Hufford;Mary Hickcox;Jean A. Paty

  • A day at a time: Predicting smoking lapse from daily urge

    Saul Shiffman;John B. Engberg;Jean A. Paty;Walter G. Perz

  • Adult Attachment Dimensions and Specificity of Emotional Distress Symptoms: Prospective Investigations of Cognitive Risk and Interpersonal Stress Generation as Mediating Mechanisms

    Benjamin L. Hankin;Benjamin L. Hankin;Jon D. Kassel;John R. Z. Abela

  • Generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation and problem drinking among college students.

    Jon D. Kassel;Shannon I. Jackson;Marina Unrod

  • Progression from a smoking lapse to relapse: Prediction from abstinence violation effects, nicotine dependence, and lapse characteristics

    Saul Shiffman;Mary Hickcox;Jean A. Paty;Maryann Gnys

  • Adult attachment security and college student substance use.

    Jon D. Kassel;Margaret Wardle;John E. Roberts

  • Prediction of lapse from associations between smoking and situational antecedents assessed by ecological momentary assessment.

    Saul Shiffman;Saul Shiffman;Mark H. Balabanis;Chad J. Gwaltney;Chad J. Gwaltney;Jean A. Paty;Jean A. Paty

  • Adolescent smoking and depression: evidence for self-medication and peer smoking mediation.

    Janet Audrain-McGovern;Daniel Rodriguez;Jon D. Kassel

  • Nicotine withdrawal in chippers and regular smokers: subjective and cognitive effects.

    Saul Shiffman;Jean A. Paty;Maryann Gnys;Jon D. Kassel

  • A comprehensive examination of hookah smoking in college students: Use patterns and contexts, social norms and attitudes, harm perception, psychological correlates and co-occurring substance use

    Adrienne J. Heinz;Grace E. Giedgowd;Natania A. Crane;Jennifer C. Veilleux

  • Temptations to smoke after quitting: A comparison of lapsers and maintainers.

    Saul Shiffman;Maryann Gnys;Thomas J. Richards;Jean A. Paty

  • Drinking and smoking: A field study of their association.

    S. Shiffman;L. A. Fischer;J. A. Paty;M. Gnys

  • Generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation predict change in anxiety and depression among college students.

    Jon D. Kassel;Marina Bornovalova;Neera Mehta

  • Smoking behavior and smoking history of tobacco chippers.

    Saul Shiffman;Jean A. Paty;Jon D. Kassel;Maryann Gnys

  • Does smoking abstinence self-efficacy vary across situations? Identifying context-specificity within the Relapse Situation Efficacy Questionnaire.

    Chad J. Gwaltney;Saul Shiffman;Gregory J. Norman;Jean A. Paty

  • Smoking and attention: A review and reformulation of the stimulus-filter hypothesis

    Jon D. Kassel

  • ATTENTIONAL MEDIATION OF CIGARETTE SMOKING'S EFFECT ON ANXIETY

    Jon D. Kassel;Saul Shiffman

Frequent Co-Authors

Saul Shiffman
Saul Shiffman University of Pittsburgh
Jean Paty
Jean Paty IQVIA (United Kingdom)
Chad J. Gwaltney
Chad J. Gwaltney Brown University
John E. Roberts
John E. Roberts University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Benjamin L. Hankin
Benjamin L. Hankin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Daniel Cervone
Daniel Cervone University of Illinois at Chicago
Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago
Belinda Borrelli
Belinda Borrelli Boston University
Andrew J. Waters
Andrew J. Waters Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Jean C. Beckham
Jean C. Beckham Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA often leads students to consider advanced degrees and specialized career paths. An increasingly popular option is pursuing an online counseling master’s degree. These programs can provide flexible learning for those balancing work, life, or geographical challenges. However, affordability remains a major concern.

Fortunately, prospective students have many accessible choices. In Florida, there are affordable online counseling master's degrees in Florida that make high-quality education within reach. For those located in specific cities, exploring the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in Fort Lauderdale offers targeted local opportunities.

Outside Florida, other states also present affordable options. For example, students can explore the most affordable online master's in counseling degree programs in Georgia or investigate affordable online counseling master's programs in Los Angeles.

Choosing a cost-effective program not only helps minimize debt but can open doors to rewarding careers in counseling, therapy, or social services, helping students build a strong foundation for future success.

Best Scientists Citing Jon D. Kassel

Recently Published Articles