World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 116 4403 4127 2404 2225 480 42521

John P. Pierce publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John P. Pierce between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John P. Pierce published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2011. 9 of the 514 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2011. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 7 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

514 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John P. Pierce: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 1
1986 7
1987 5
1988 0
1989 9
1990 11
1991 4
1992 12
1993 9
1994 7
1995 13
1996 11
1997 11
1998 6
1999 15
2000 7
2001 7
2002 13
2003 6
2004 15
2005 16
2006 15
2007 20
2008 14
2009 18
2010 20
2011 31
2012 15
2013 18
2014 16
2015 14
2016 14
2017 18
2018 15
2019 15
2020 19
2021 17
2022 17
2023 17
2024 5
2025 8
2026 1
Total 514
Download as CSV

John P. Pierce publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John P. Pierce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 480 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 480
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John P. Pierce D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John P. Pierce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 116–117 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318 116
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John P. Pierce is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions in subfields including Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Oncology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics connected to health and behavior, such as:

  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Noise Effects and Management

John P. Pierce has contributed to numerous publications, with research articles appearing in journals where they are frequently published. Notable venues include:

  • Tobacco Control
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • JAMA Network Open
  • PEDIATRICS
  • PLoS ONE

Significant recent papers authored by John P. Pierce include:

  • Use of E-cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products and Progression to Daily Cigarette Smoking, 2021, PEDIATRICS
  • Role of e-cigarettes and pharmacotherapy during attempts to quit cigarette smoking: The PATH Study 2013-16, 2020, PLoS ONE

Other impactful papers associated with their research area are:

  • Widening disparities in cigarette smoking by race/ethnicity across education level in the United States, 2020, Preventive Medicine
  • Effectiveness of e-cigarettes as aids for smoking cessation: evidence from the PATH Study cohort, 2017-2019, 2022, Tobacco Control
  • Effect of a Behavioral Intervention to Increase Vegetable Consumption on Cancer Progression Among Men With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer, 2020, JAMA

The scientific collaborations of John P. Pierce frequently include colleagues such as:

  • David R. Strong
  • Eric C. Leas
  • Karen Messer
  • Matthew D. Stone
  • Dennis R. Trinidad

Best Publications

  • Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States.

    John P. Pierce;Won S. Choi;Elizabeth A. Gilpin;Arthur J. Farkas

  • Methods used to quit smoking in the United States. Do cessation programs help

    Michael C. Fiore;Thomas E. Novotny;John P. Pierce;Gary A. Giovino

  • Influence of a diet very high in vegetables, fruit, and fiber and low in fat on prognosis following treatment for breast cancer: the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) randomized trial.

    John P. Pierce;Loki Natarajan;Bette J. Caan;Barbara A. Parker

  • Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

    Andrew Hyland;Bridget K. Ambrose;Kevin P. Conway;Nicolette Borek

  • Tobacco Industry Promotion of Cigarettes and Adolescent Smoking

    John P. Pierce;Won S. Choi;Elizabeth A. Gilpin;Arthur J. Farkas

  • Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. Educational differences are increasing.

    John P. Pierce;Michael C. Fiore;Thomas E. Novotny;Evridiki J. Hatziandreu

  • Distribution of smokers by stage in three representative samples.

    Wayne F. Velicer;Joseph L. Fava;James O. Prochaska;David B. Abrams

  • Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. The changing influence of gender and race.

    Michael C. Fiore;Thomas E. Novotny;John P. Pierce;Evridiki J. Hatziandreu

  • Greater Survival After Breast Cancer in Physically Active Women With High Vegetable-Fruit Intake Regardless of Obesity

    John P. Pierce;Marcia L. Stefanick;Shirley W. Flatt;Loki Natarajan

  • Smoking cessation with and without assistance

    Shu-Hong Zhu;Ted Melcer;Jichao Sun;Bradley Rosbrook

  • Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. Projections to the year 2000.

    John P. Pierce;Michael C. Fiore;Thomas E. Novotny;Evridiki J. Hatziandreu

  • Influence of Tobacco Marketing and Exposure to Smokers on Adolescent Susceptibility to Smoking

    Nicola Evans;Arthur Farkas;Elizabeth Gilpin;Charles Berry

  • Telephone Counseling for Smoking Cessation: Effects of Single-Session and Multiple-Session Interventions

    Shu-Hong Zhu;Vincent Stretch;Mark Balabanis;Bradley Rosbrook

  • How long will today's new adolescent smoker be addicted to cigarettes?

    J P Pierce;E Gilpin

  • Association between household and workplace smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking.

    Arthur J. Farkas;Elizabeth A. Gilpin;Martha M. White;John P. Pierce

  • Does tobacco advertising target young people to start smoking? Evidence from California.

    John P. Pierce;Elizabeth Gilpin;David M. Burns;Elizabeth Whalen

  • HAS THE CALIFORNIA TOBACCO CONTROL PROGRAM REDUCED SMOKING

    John P. Pierce;Elizabeth A. Gilpin;Sherry L. Emery;Martha M. White

  • Tamoxifen Metabolite Concentrations, CYP2D6 Genotype, and Breast Cancer Outcomes

    L Madlensky;L Natarajan;S Tchu;M Pu

  • The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours

    Arthur J Farkas;Elizabeth A Gilpin;Janet M Distefan;John P Pierce

  • Smoking initiation by adolescent girls, 1944 through 1988. An association with targeted advertising.

    John P. Pierce;Lora Lee;Elizabeth A. Gilpin

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth A. Gilpin
Elizabeth A. Gilpin University of California, San Diego
Loki Natarajan
Loki Natarajan University of California, San Diego
Cheryl L. Rock
Cheryl L. Rock University of California, San Diego
Bette J. Caan
Bette J. Caan Kaiser Permanente
Cynthia A. Thomson
Cynthia A. Thomson University of Arizona
Ruth E. Patterson
Ruth E. Patterson University of California, San Diego
David R. Strong
David R. Strong University of California, San Diego
Ellen B. Gold
Ellen B. Gold University of California, Davis
Marcia L. Stefanick
Marcia L. Stefanick Stanford University
Xiao-Ou Shu
Xiao-Ou Shu Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related healthcare careers can expand your options beyond traditional medical school. Many students interested in medicine also consider allied health roles and administrative pathways, which often offer flexible online study options and diverse entry requirements.

For those interested in patient records and healthcare management, financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes can make starting a career in medical billing both accessible and affordable. Meanwhile, prospective nurses might wonder, do you have to take a teas test for lpn? Some nursing schools do not require the TEAS or HESI exams, reducing barriers for entry.

If you're looking to move into the management side of healthcare, consider accredited healthcare administration degrees available online—ideal if you want to play a key role in shaping healthcare operations. Current registered nurses wishing to advance can explore adn to msn bridge programs, which provide a direct pathway from an associate degree to a master’s in nursing.

Best Scientists Citing John P. Pierce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles