World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
8194
World Ranking
17282
National Ranking
7106

John M. Tomich publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Tomich sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 190 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John M. Tomich D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Tomich sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Tomich is affiliated with Kansas State University in the United States and specializes in research spanning Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Materials Science. Their academic contributions include 16 publications in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology and Biomaterials at the subfield level.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including RNA Interference and Gene Delivery, Advanced Biosensing and Bioanalysis Techniques, Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery, Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials, Insect Resistance and Genetics, as well as Nanoparticles synthesis and applications.

Frequent publication venues for John M. Tomich include Molecular Pharmaceutics and The FASEB Journal, each with two publications, alongside Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biomaterials Science, and Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

Co-authorship collaborations have regularly involved Pavithra Natarajan and Sherry D. Fleming, each contributing to five joint publications. Other frequent collaborators include L. Adriana Avila, Susan K. Whitaker, and Jennifer M. Rowe.

Noteworthy recent publications feature:

  • Understanding the influence of experimental factors on bio-interactions of nanoparticles: Towards improving correlation between in vitro and in vivo studies, 2020, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • A Study of the Cellular Uptake of Magnetic Branched Amphiphilic Peptide Capsules, 2020, Molecular Pharmaceutics
  • Evaluation of transfection efficacy, biodistribution, and toxicity of branched amphiphilic peptide capsules (BAPCs) associated with mRNA, 2022, Biomaterials Science
  • Design of Peptides that Fold and Self-Assemble on Graphite, 2022, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • Beta2 glycoprotein I-derived therapeutic peptides induce sFlt-1 secretion to reduce melanoma vascularity and growth, 2020, Cancer Letters

Best Publications

  • A chemically synthesized pre-sequence of an imported mitochondrial protein can form an amphiphilic helix and perturb natural and artificial phospholipid bilayers.

    David Roise;Suzanna J. Horvath;John M. Tomich;John H. Richards

  • Identification of a peptide inhibitor of the cardiac sarcolemmal Na+-Ca2+ exchanger

    Zhaoping Li;D. A. Nicoll;A. Collins;D. W. Hilgemann

  • Amphiphilicity is essential for mitochondrial presequence function.

    David Roise;Franziska Theiler;Suzanna J. Horvath;John M. Tomich

  • Purification and characterization of an inhibitor (soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor) for tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin obtained from the serum ultrafiltrates of human cancer patients.

    Tetsuya Gatanaga;Chenduen Hwang;William Kohr;Fabio Cappuccini

  • A fratricidal mechanism is responsible for eDNA release and contributes to biofilm development of Enterococcus faecalis

    Vinai Chittezham Thomas;Yasuaki Hiromasa;Nathan Harms;Lance Thurlow

  • Role of anthocyanin‐enriched purple‐fleshed sweet potato p40 in colorectal cancer prevention

    Soyoung Lim;Jianteng Xu;Jaeyong Kim;Tzu-Yu Chen

  • Orientations of amphipathic helical peptides in membrane bilayers determined by solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

    B. Bechinger;Y. Kim;L. E. Chirlian;J. Gesell

  • Characterisation and stability of anthocyanins in purple-fleshed sweet potato P40.

    Jianteng Xu;Xiaoyu Su;Soyoung Lim;Jason Griffin

  • Synporins--synthetic proteins that emulate the pore structure of biological ionic channels.

    Mauricio Montal;Myrta S. Montal;John M. Tomich

  • Plasmin-mediated proteolysis of casein in bovine milk

    W. N. Eigel;C. J. Hofmann;B. A. K. Chibber;J. M. Tomich

  • Structure and evolution of a multidomain multiphosphoryl transfer protein. Nucleotide sequence of the fruB(HI) gene in Rhodobacter capsulatus and comparisons with homologous genes from other organisms.

    Long-Fei Wu;John M. Tomich;Milton H. Saier

  • Identification of the neurotrophic factor sequence of prosaposin.

    John S. O'Brien;Geoffrey S. Carson;Hee-Chan Seo;Masao Hiraiwa

  • Synthetic peptides and four-helix bundle proteins as model systems for the pore-forming structure of channel proteins. II. Transmembrane segment M2 of the brain glycine receptor is a plausible candidate for the pore-lining structure.

    G L Reddy;T Iwamoto;J M Tomich;M Montal

  • Armet is an effector protein mediating aphid–plant interactions

    Wei Wang;Wei Wang;Huaien Dai;Yi Zhang;Raman Chandrasekar

  • Peptide Nanovesicles Formed by the Self-Assembly of Branched Amphiphilic Peptides

    Sushanth Gudlur;Pinakin Sukthankar;Jian Gao;L. Adriana Avila

  • Nucleotide sequence of the Rhodobacter capsulatus fruK gene, which encodes fructose-1-phosphate kinase: evidence for a kinase superfamily including both phosphofructokinases of Escherichia coli.

    Long-Fei Wu;A. Reizer;J. Reizer;Bing Cai

  • A molecular blueprint for the pore-forming structure of voltage-gated calcium channels

    Anne Grove;John M. Tomich;Mauricio Montal

  • Synthetic peptides and four-helix bundle proteins as model systems for the pore-forming structure of channel proteins. I. Transmembrane segment M2 of the nicotinic cholinergic receptor channel is a key pore-lining structure.

    M. Oblatt-Montal;L.K. Bühler;T. Iwamoto;J.M. Tomich

  • Identification of an ion channel-forming motif in the primary structure of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins

    Myrta S. Monta;Richard Blewitt;John M. Tomich;Mauricio Montal

  • Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of rigid and membranous cuticles and epidermis from the elytra and hindwings of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

    Neal T. Dittmer;Yasuaki Hiromasa;John M. Tomich;Nanyan Lu

Frequent Co-Authors

Mauricio Montal
Mauricio Montal University of California, San Diego
John A. Barranger
John A. Barranger University of Pittsburgh
Milton H. Saier
Milton H. Saier University of California, San Diego
John H. Richards
John H. Richards California Institute of Technology
Long-Fei Wu
Long-Fei Wu Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Karl J. Kramer
Karl J. Kramer Kansas State University
John S. O'Brien
John S. O'Brien University of California, San Diego
Talat S. Rahman
Talat S. Rahman University of Central Florida
Brenda Oppert
Brenda Oppert Agricultural Research Service
Youssef Hatefi
Youssef Hatefi Scripps Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a wide variety of careers, many of which now offer flexible online education options. For those interested in the pharmaceutical field, online pharmacy schools provide a pathway to advanced roles in pharmacy, with rigorous curriculum accessible from anywhere.

If you are passionate about human movement or sports medicine, consider an exercise science degree online or a kinesiology degree online. These programs combine scientific fundamentals with practical training, preparing graduates for dynamic roles in health, wellness, and rehabilitation.

For those aiming to specialize in mental health nursing, the shortest pmhnp certificate program offers a swift route to becoming a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. This can be an ideal option for biology and biochemistry graduates seeking to branch into advanced nursing and mental health care.

Exploring these related programs can broaden your career options and help you adapt to evolving healthcare and science fields, all with the convenience of online study.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Tomich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles