World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
4561
World Ranking
7875
National Ranking
2792

John D. W. Barrick publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. W. Barrick sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 87 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John D. W. Barrick D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. W. Barrick sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John D. W. Barrick is affiliated with the Langley Research Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant focus on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

Their work covers several key topics including Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Air Quality and Health Impacts, and Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds.

John D. W. Barrick has contributed to multiple publications, with recent papers published between 2020 and 2022. These include:

  • "Validation of IASI Satellite Ammonia Observations at the Pixel Scale Using In Situ Vertical Profiles," 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Airborne formaldehyde and volatile organic compound measurements over the Daesan petrochemical complex on Korea's northwest coast during the Korea-United States Air Quality study," 2020, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • "Spatial heterogeneity in CO2, CH4, and energy fluxes: insights from airborne eddy covariance measurements over the Mid-Atlantic region," 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Beyond the Ångström Exponent: Probing Additional Information in Spectral Curvature and Variability of In Situ Aerosol Hyperspectral (0.3-0.7 μm) Optical Properties," 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Several frequent coauthors have collaborated with Barrick, including Tomáš Mikoviny, Armin Wisthaler, J. B. Nowak, J. H. Crawford, and Glenn S. Diskin, each appearing multiple times in joint research efforts.

The scientist's frequent publication venues reflect the thematic emphasis of their research and include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene

Best Publications

  • Biofuel blending reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions

    Richard H. Moore;Kenneth L. Thornhill;Bernadett Weinzierl;Bernadett Weinzierl;Daniel Sauer;Daniel Sauer

  • Testing fast photochemical theory during TRACE‐P based on measurements of OH, HO2, and CH2O

    Jennifer R. Olson;J. H. Crawford;G. Chen;A. Fried

  • HOx chemistry during INTEX-A 2004: Observation, model calculation, and comparison with previous studies

    Xinrong Ren;Jennifer R. Olson;James H. Crawford;William H. Brune

  • Assessment of ozone photochemistry in the western North Pacific as inferred from PEM‐West A observations during the fall 1991

    D. D. Davis;J. Crawford;G. Chen;W. Chameides

  • Regional-scale chemical transport modeling in support of the analysis of observations obtained during the TRACE-P experiment

    G. R. Carmichael;Y. Tang;G. Kurata;I. Uno

  • Assessment of upper tropospheric HOx sources over the tropical Pacific based on NASA GTE/PEM data: Net effect on HOx and other photochemical parameters

    J. Crawford;D. Davis;J. Olson;G. Chen

  • The Arctic Boundary Layer Expedition (ABLE 3A): July–August 1988

    R. C. Harriss;S. C. Wofsy;J. M. Hoell;R. J. Bendura

  • An Assessment of Ozone Photochemistry in the Extratropical Western North Pacific: Impact of Continental Outflow During the Late Winter/Early Spring

    J. Crawford;D. Davis;G. Chen;J. Bradshaw

  • Horizontal wavenumber spectra of winds, temperature, and trace gases during the Pacific Exploratory Missions: 1. Climatology

    John Y. N. Cho;Yong Zhu;Reginald E. Newell;Bruce E. Anderson

  • Enhancement of acidic gases in biomass burning impacted air masses over Canada

    B. L. Lefer;R. W. Talbot;R. H. Harriss;J. D. Bradshaw

  • Airborne observations of aerosol extinction by in situ and remote-sensing techniques: Evaluation of particle hygroscopicity

    Luke D. Ziemba;K. Lee Thornhill;Rich Ferrare;John Barrick

  • A photostationary state analysis of the NO2-NO system based on airborne observations from the subtropical/tropical North and South Atlantic

    D. D. Davis;G. Chen;W. Chameides;J. Bradshaw

  • Implications of large scale shifts in tropospheric NO x levels in the remote tropical Pacific

    J. H. Crawford;D. D. Davis;G. Chen;J. Bradshaw

  • Characterizations of tropospheric turbulence and stability layers from aircraft observations

    John Y. N. Cho;Reginald E. Newell;Bruce E. Anderson;John D. W. Barrick

  • LASE Validation Experiment

    Edward V. Browell;Syed Ismail;William M. Hall;Alvah S. Moore

  • Summertime partitioning and budget of NOy compounds in the troposphere over Alaska and Canada: ABLE 3B

    S. Sandholm;J. Olson;J. Bradshaw;R. Talbot

  • Summertime tropospheric observations related to N x O y distributions and partitioning over Alaska: Arctic Boundary Layer Expedition 3A

    S. T. Sandholm;J. D. Bradshaw;G. Chen;H. B. Singh

  • Horizontal wavenumber spectra of winds, temperature, and trace gases during the Pacific Exploratory Missions: 2. Gravity waves, quasi‐two‐dimensional turbulence, and vortical modes

    John Y. N. Cho;Reginald E. Newell;John D. Barrick

  • Airborne flux measurements of trace species in an Arctic boundary layer

    John A. Ritter;John D. W. Barrick;Glen W. Sachse;Gerald L. Gregory

  • Photolysis frequency of NO2: Measurement and modeling during the International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and Modeling Intercomparison (IPMMI)

    R. E. Shetter;W. Junkermann;W. H. Swartz;G. J. Frost

  • International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and Model Intercomparison (IPMMI): Spectral actinic solar flux measurements and modeling

    A. F. Bais;S. Madronich;J. Crawford;S. R. Hall

  • Regional-scale chemical transport modeling in support of the analysis of observations obtained during the TRACE-P experiment : NASA global tropospheric experiment transport and chemical evolution over the pacific (TRACE-P): Measurements and analysis (TRACEP1)

    G. R. Carmichael;Y. Tang;G. Kurata;I. Uno

Frequent Co-Authors

G. W. Sachse
G. W. Sachse Langley Research Center
Donald R. Blake
Donald R. Blake University of California, Irvine
Scott T. Sandholm
Scott T. Sandholm Georgia Institute of Technology
Bruce E. Anderson
Bruce E. Anderson Langley Research Center
James H. Crawford
James H. Crawford Langley Research Center
Gerald L. Gregory
Gerald L. Gregory Langley Research Center
Barry Lefer
Barry Lefer National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Robert W. Talbot
Robert W. Talbot University of Houston
Richard E. Shetter
Richard E. Shetter National Center for Atmospheric Research
Brian G. Heikes
Brian G. Heikes University of Rhode Island

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways that combine science, technology, and public policy. For those interested in spatial data and environmental mapping, exploring the best GIS schools is a smart step. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are invaluable for environmental analysis and resource management.

If your career goals lean towards leadership and public administration in environmental sectors, enrolling in top online MPA programs offers a flexible way to gain critical administrative skills. Combining environmental expertise with public policy knowledge helps drive impactful change.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is just as crucial. Pursuing accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide insights into community behavior, social trends, and sustainable development practices.

For advanced professionals aiming to influence environmental policy or research, doctoral programs online no dissertation offer flexible options to achieve a terminal degree without the traditional dissertation requirement, accelerating your academic and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing John D. W. Barrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles