World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 59 3343 3067 1318 1173 276 9212

Linda D. Hazlett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda D. Hazlett between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda D. Hazlett published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2002. 10 of the 309 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2002. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1971 2025

309 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda D. Hazlett: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 2
1977 7
1978 6
1979 3
1980 4
1981 3
1982 3
1983 4
1984 2
1985 4
1986 3
1987 5
1988 3
1989 4
1990 2
1991 4
1992 8
1993 2
1994 3
1995 7
1996 9
1997 7
1998 6
1999 7
2000 9
2001 5
2002 13
2003 9
2004 12
2005 12
2006 10
2007 12
2008 7
2009 7
2010 13
2011 7
2012 9
2013 7
2014 6
2015 4
2016 9
2017 5
2018 3
2019 7
2020 6
2021 9
2022 3
2023 3
2024 6
2025 4
Total 309
Download as CSV

Linda D. Hazlett publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda D. Hazlett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 275–284 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 276 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148 276
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Linda D. Hazlett D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda D. Hazlett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151 59
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda D. Hazlett is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States and has contributed significantly to research in multiple scientific domains, particularly biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, environmental science, and medicine. Their work spans various subfields including health, toxicology, mutagenesis, molecular biology, immunology, pharmacology, and radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging.

The scientist's research topics frequently address areas such as air quality and health impacts, climate change and health impacts, immune response and inflammation, corneal surgery and treatments, pharmacological effects of natural compounds, advanced glycation end products research, and ocular surface and contact lens studies.

Recent publications by Linda D. Hazlett include the following:

  • Airborne Particulates Affect Corneal Homeostasis and Immunity (2020) in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Phenotypes of CF rabbits generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disruption of the CFTR gene (2020) in JCI Insight
  • Nano-Biomaterials for Retinal Regeneration (2021) in Nanomaterials
  • Effects of Glycyrrhizin Treatment on Diabetic Cornea (2020) in Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
  • Targeting Inflammation Driven by HMGB1 in Bacterial Keratitis-A Review (2021) in Pathogens

Linda D. Hazlett has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Pathogens
  • The Ocular Surface
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Scientific Reports

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Linda D. Hazlett include:

  • Sharon A. McClellan
  • Mallika Somayajulu
  • Ahalya Pitchaikannu
  • Shunbin Xu
  • Denise Bessert

Best Publications

  • Corneal response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

    Linda Dondero Hazlett

  • Defensins in innate immunity

    Linda Hazlett;Minhao Wu

  • Thymosin Beta 4 Promotes Corneal Wound Healing and Decreases Inflammation in Vivo Following Alkali Injury

    Gabriel Sosne;Elizabeth A. Szliter;Ronald Barrett;Karen A. Kernacki

  • Prolonged Elevation of IL-1 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ocular Infection Regulates Macrophage-Inflammatory Protein-2 Production, Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Persistence, and Corneal Perforation

    Xiaowen L. Rudner;Karen A. Kernacki;Ronald P. Barrett;Linda D. Hazlett

  • Increased severity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal infection in strains of mice designated as Th1 versus Th2 responsive

    Linda D. Hazlett;Sharon McClellan;Byungsuk Kwon;Ronald Barrett

  • Macrophage inflammatory protein-2 is a mediator of polymorphonuclear neutrophil influx in ocular bacterial infection.

    Karen A. Kernacki;Ronald P. Barrett;Jeffery A. Hobden;Linda D. Hazlett

  • Thymosin beta 4 promotes corneal wound healing and modulates inflammatory mediators in vivo.

    Gabriel Sosne;Chi Chao Chan;Khoan Thai;Michael Kennedy

  • Evidence for N-acetylmannosamine as an ocular receptor for P. aeruginosa adherence to scarified cornea.

    L D Hazlett;M M Moon;M Strejc;R S Berk

  • Pili and lipopolysaccharide of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bind to the glycolipid asialo GM1.

    S K Gupta;R S Berk;S Masinick;L D Hazlett

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide binds galectin-3 and other human corneal epithelial proteins.

    Suresh K. Gupta;Sharon Masinick;Michael Garrett;Linda D. Hazlett

  • Early cytokine and chemokine gene expression during Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal infection in mice

    Karen A. Kernacki;Dennis J. Goebel;Michael S. Poosch;Linda D. Hazlett

  • IL-33 Shifts Macrophage Polarization, Promoting Resistance against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Keratitis

    Linda D. Hazlett;Sharon A. McClellan;Ronald P. Barrett;Xi Huang

  • Silencing Toll-like receptor-9 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis.

    Xi Huang;Ronald P. Barrett;Sharon A. McClellan;Linda D. Hazlett

  • TLR4 Is Required for Host Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Keratitis

    Xi Huang;Wenjin Du;Sharon A. McClellan;Ronald P. Barrett

  • Macrophages Restrict Pseudomonas aeruginosa Growth, Regulate Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Influx, and Balance Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines in BALB/c Mice

    Sharon A. McClellan;Xi Huang;Ronald P. Barrett;Nico van Rooijen

  • SIGIRR promotes resistance against Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis by down-regulating type-1 immunity and IL-1R1 and TLR4 signaling.

    Xi Huang;Linda D. Hazlett;Wenjin Du;Ronald P. Barrett

  • In vivo bacterial protease production during Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal infection.

    K A Kernacki;J A Hobden;L D Hazlett;R Fridman

  • Pathogenic Mechanisms of P. aeruginosa Keratitis: A Review of the Role of T Cells, Langerhans Cells, PMN, and Cytokines

    Linda D. Hazlett

  • Toll-like receptors and the eye.

    Fu Shin X Yu;Linda D. Hazlett

  • Infectious corneal ulceration: a proposal for neglected tropical disease status.

    Lawson Ung;Nisha R. Acharya;Tushar Agarwal;Eduardo C. Alfonso

  • TREM-1 Amplifies Corneal Inflammation after Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection by Modulating Toll-Like Receptor Signaling and Th1/Th2-Type Immune Responses

    Minhao Wu;Anping Peng;Mingxia Sun;Qiuchan Deng

Frequent Co-Authors

Fu-Shin X. Yu
Fu-Shin X. Yu Wayne State University
Michael E. Stern
Michael E. Stern University of Cologne
Hynda K. Kleinman
Hynda K. Kleinman George Washington University
Reza Dana
Reza Dana Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Eric Pearlman
Eric Pearlman University of California, Irvine
Jerry Y. Niederkorn
Jerry Y. Niederkorn The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Alan R. Burns
Alan R. Burns University of Houston
Rafael Fridman
Rafael Fridman Wayne State University
Daniel B. Jones
Daniel B. Jones Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Mark D. P. Willcox
Mark D. P. Willcox University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that extend beyond traditional lab roles. For those seeking to advance public health knowledge quickly, looking into the fastest and easiest online mph programs can provide flexible options to gain a Master of Public Health degree with minimal barriers.

Graduates can also pivot to healthcare specialties like becoming a child life specialist, where understanding biology and patient care is crucial. For insight into this field’s rewards, including compensation, visit child.life specialist salary.

Students with varied backgrounds, including those with past challenges, may find suitable opportunities in online education. Several degrees felons can get highlight how education in science and healthcare remains accessible, contributing to meaningful careers.

Another growing area linked to microbiology principles is functional medicine nursing. To understand financial prospects in this innovative field, the resource on functional medicine nurse salary is invaluable for prospective students.

Best Scientists Citing Linda D. Hazlett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles