World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
21951
World Ranking
5544
National Ranking
2633

John A. Smith publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 268 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John A. Smith D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Smith is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. This association places them within an academic environment known for research and education in a variety of scientific disciplines.

Details of their recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, and book publications are not available, which limits insight into the specific outputs and collaborations of their research career.

Similarly, specific fields and subfields of study are not listed, so there is no direct information about their areas of academic specialization or focus within science and research.

Information regarding main topics of work has not been provided, restricting the ability to outline thematic concentrations of their research projects or scholarly inquiries.

No awards have been recorded in the provided data to indicate formal recognitions or distinctions received throughout their career.

Best Publications

  • Turns in peptides and proteins.

    Rose Gd;Gierasch Lm;Smith Ja

  • Identification of a putative second T-cell receptor.

    Michael B. Brenner;Michael B. Brenner;Joanne McLean;Deno P. Dialynas;Jack L. Strominger

  • High molecular mass forms of basic fibroblast growth factor are initiated by alternative CUG codons.

    H Prats;M Kaghad;A C Prats;M Klagsbrun

  • Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

    Arlene Chan;Suzette Delaloge;Frankie A Holmes;Beverly Moy

  • Structural characteristics of an antigen required for its interaction with Ia and recognition by T cells

    Alessandro Sette;Søren Buus;Sonia Colon;John A. Smith

  • Rapid separation and purification of oligonucleotides by high-performance capillary gel electrophoresis

    A. S. Cohen;D. R. Najarian;A. Paulus;A. Guttman

  • International, randomized, controlled trial of lamifiban (a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor), heparin, or both in unstable angina

    E Topol;R Califf;F Van De Werf;R Diaz

  • Prediction of major histocompatibility complex binding regions of protein antigens by sequence pattern analysis

    Alessandro Sette;Soren Buus;Ettore Appella;John A. Smith

  • High-performance capillary electrophoretic separation of bases, nucleosides, and oligonucleotides: retention manipulation via micellar solutions and metal additives.

    A. S. Cohen;S. Terabe;J. A. Smith;B. L. Karger

  • Antigenic determinants in proteins coincide with surface regions accessible to large probes (antibody domains)

    Jiri Novotny;Mark Handschumacher;Edgar Haber;Robert E. Bruccoleri

  • Immunological self, nonself discrimination.

    Jean-Gerard Guillet;Ming-Zong Lai;Thomas J. Briner;Soren Buus

  • Autoimmune target in Heymann nephritis is a glycoprotein with homology to the LDL receptor

    Raktima Raychowdhury;John L. Niles;Robert T. McCluskey;John A. Smith

  • Fibroblast growth factors and their receptors

    Zoya Galzie;Anne R Kinsella;John A Smith

  • Effect of growth conditions on the properties and morphology of chemically derived epitaxial thin films of Ba2YCu3O7−x on (001) LaAlO3

    Paul C. McIntyre;Michael J. Cima;John A. Smith;Robert B. Hallock

  • Human tumor cells synthesize an endothelial cell growth factor that is structurally related to basic fibroblast growth factor

    Michael Klagsbrun;Joachim Sasse;Robert Sullivan;John A. Smith

  • Identification of distinct C3b and C4b recognition sites in the human C3b/C4b receptor (CR1, CD35) by deletion mutagenesis.

    L B Klickstein;T J Bartow;V Miletic;L D Rabson

  • Human C3b/C4b receptor (CR1). Demonstration of long homologous repeating domains that are composed of the short consensus repeats characteristics of C3/C4 binding proteins.

    L B Klickstein;W W Wong;J A Smith;J H Weis

  • High critical current density thick MOD-derived YBCO films

    J.A. Smith;M.J. Cima;N. Sonnenberg

  • Nucleotide sequences of the human and mouse atrial natriuretic factor genes.

    Christine E. Seidman;Kenneth D. Bloch;Karen A. Klein;John A. Smith

  • The structure of rat preproatrial natriuretic factor as defined by a complementary DNA clone

    Christine E. Seidman;Allan D. Duby;Edmund Choi;Robert M. Graham

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Fernig
David G. Fernig University of Liverpool
Philip S. Rudland
Philip S. Rudland University of Liverpool
Roger Barraclough
Roger Barraclough University of Liverpool
Douglas T. Fearon
Douglas T. Fearon Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Jonathan G. Seidman
Jonathan G. Seidman Harvard University
Jonathan M. Rhodes
Jonathan M. Rhodes University of Liverpool
Marlene L. Rose
Marlene L. Rose Imperial College London
David L. Perkins
David L. Perkins University of New Mexico
Ming-Zong Lai
Ming-Zong Lai Academia Sinica

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to many specialized online degrees, offering flexible routes into dynamic health sectors. An accelerated healthcare management degree online is ideal for those aiming to quickly build leadership skills essential for managing hospitals, research labs, or biotech firms.

For students interested in mental health, psychiatric np programs combine advanced clinical training with a biology foundation, preparing graduates to support communities as psychiatric nurse practitioners.

If nutrition and wellness are your passion, nutrition degree programs can expand career pathways into consultancy, health coaching, or food science.

Business-minded students may consider the cheapest online mba healthcare to blend management expertise with a science background, positioning themselves for decision-making roles across medical settings.

These related online degrees and certifications help students specialize, respond to changing job markets, and secure rewarding careers in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Smith

Trending Scientists