World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
19189
World Ranking
17727
National Ranking
742

Joan Ivanov publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan Ivanov sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 228 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joan Ivanov D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan Ivanov sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joan Ivanov is affiliated with the University Health Network in Canada. Their professional focus is situated within an institutional context known for clinical and biomedical research.

Information about specific research papers authored by Joan Ivanov is not available, which limits the ability to provide details on the exact topics, findings, or publication venues of their research outputs. Similarly, there are no records of frequent co-authors, indicating either a solitary research approach or limited data availability on collaborations.

Details regarding the main or subfields of study associated with Joan Ivanov have not been documented in the available data. This absence precludes identifying particular academic disciplines or specialized areas where they contribute.

No information on main topics of work or the thematic concentration of their research has been provided.

Joan Ivanov has not published any books or book chapters with known publishers based on the data available. Likewise, there are no recognized awards or distinctions attributed to this scientist at this time.

Given the limited data, a comprehensive view of Joan Ivanov's academic and scientific footprint is constrained to their role within the University Health Network in Canada, without further specifics on their research scope or scholarly impact.

Best Publications

  • Cardiomyocyte transplantation improves heart function.

    Ren-Ke Li;Zhi-Qiang Jia;Richard D. Weisel;Donald A.G. Mickle

  • DEEP STERNAL WOUND INFECTION : RISK FACTORS AND OUTCOMES

    Michael A Borger;Vivek Rao;Richard D Weisel;Joan Ivanov

  • Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease

    Michael A. Borger;Michael A. Borger;Mark Preston;Mark Preston;Joan Ivanov;Joan Ivanov;Paul W.M. Fedak;Paul W.M. Fedak

  • A comparison of outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse

    Tirone E. David;Joan Ivanov;Susan Armstrong;Debbie Christie

  • Hemodilution during cardiopulmonary bypass is an independent risk factor for acute renal failure in adult cardiac surgery

    K. Karkouti;K. Karkouti;W.S. Beattie;D.N. Wijeysundera;D.N. Wijeysundera;V. Rao

  • Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after the ross procedure

    Tirone E. David;Ahmad Omran;Joan Ivanov;Susan Armstrong

  • Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Affects Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement

    Vivek Rao;W. R. Jamieson;Joan Ivanov;Susan Armstrong

  • Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass

    Vivek Rao;Joan Ivanov;Richard D. Weisel;John S. Ikonomidis

  • Long-term results of mitral valve repair for myxomatous disease with and without chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures

    Tirone E. David;Ahmad Omran;Susan Armstrong;Zhao Sun

  • Low Hematocrit During Cardiopulmonary Bypass is Associated With Increased Risk of Perioperative Stroke in Cardiac Surgery

    Keyvan Karkouti;Keyvan Karkouti;George Djaiani;Michael A. Borger;William S. Beattie

  • Results of surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome

    Nilto Carias de Oliveira;Tirone E. David;Joan Ivanov;Susan Armstrong

  • Accelerated myocardial metabolic recovery with terminal warm blood cardioplegia

    K H Teoh;G T Christakis;R D Weisel;S E Fremes

  • Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

    Tirone E David;Susan Armstrong;Joan Ivanov;Sion Barnard

  • Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor ventricular function

    George T. Christakis;Richard D. Weisel;Stephen E. Fremes;Joan Ivanov

  • Results of aortic valve-sparing operations.

    Tirone E. David;Susan Armstrong;Joan Ivanov;Christopher M. Feindel

  • Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis

    Tirone E. David;Joan Ivanov;Sue Armstrong;Christopher M. Feindel

  • Late outcomes of mitral valve repair for floppy valves: Implications for asymptomatic patients.

    Tirone E. David;Joan Ivanov;Susan Armstrong;Harry Rakowski

  • Mitral valve surgery in patients with extensive calcification of the mitral annulus.

    Christopher M Feindel;Zafar Tufail;Tirone E David;Joan Ivanov

  • Ready-Made, Recalibrated, or Remodeled? Issues in the Use of Risk Indexes for Assessing Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

    Joan Ivanov;Jack V. Tu;C. David Naylor

  • Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis

    Göran Dellgren;Tirone E. David;Tirone E. David;Ehud Raanani;Ehud Raanani;Susan Armstrong;Susan Armstrong

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard D. Weisel
Richard D. Weisel University Health Network
Tirone E. David
Tirone E. David University of Toronto
Vivek Rao
Vivek Rao University Health Network
Stephen E. Fremes
Stephen E. Fremes University of Toronto
Michael A. Borger
Michael A. Borger Leipzig University
Sylvain Houle
Sylvain Houle University of Toronto
Jack V. Tu
Jack V. Tu University of Toronto
Duminda N. Wijeysundera
Duminda N. Wijeysundera University of Toronto
Gary D. Webb
Gary D. Webb Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Peter Liu
Peter Liu University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine is a multifaceted field, and there are several rewarding career pathways beyond becoming a physician. Many students interested in healthcare opt for related online degrees, which provide flexibility and affordability.

For example, those interested in pharmaceuticals can pursue online pharmacy programs to become a pharmacist or expand their role in pharmaceutical science. Similarly, earning an online rhit degree prepares students for vital positions in health information management, supporting the industry’s growing need for data accuracy and security.

Other high-demand careers include medical billing specialists. Completing medical billing and coding online courses can open doors to administrative roles essential for clinic and hospital operations. Aspiring advanced practice nurses may consider cheap online fnp programs to achieve the Family Nurse Practitioner qualification.

Exploring these online degree options enables students to align their interests with in-demand healthcare roles, offering flexible learning while making a meaningful impact in the industry.

Best Scientists Citing Joan Ivanov

Recently Published Articles