World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 38 6642 6413 84 83 147 5547

Joachim Mergeay publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joachim Mergeay between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joachim Mergeay published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2014. 12 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2014. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joachim Mergeay: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 6
2008 2
2009 6
2010 3
2011 16
2012 7
2013 20
2014 22
2015 15
2016 14
2017 11
2018 6
2019 7
2020 12
2021 22
2022 2
2023 15
2024 13
2025 11
2026 1
Total 219
Download as CSV

Joachim Mergeay publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Mergeay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 147 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246 147
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Joachim Mergeay D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Mergeay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254 38
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Joachim Mergeay is affiliated with the Research Institute for Nature and Forest in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these fields, their subfields of study include Genetics, Ecology, Plant Science, Ecological Modeling, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects related to biodiversity and genetics, such as Genetic diversity and population structure, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Plant and animal studies, Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock, and Genetically Modified Organisms Research.

Frequent co-authors of Joachim Mergeay include:

  • Sean Hoban
  • Ivan Paz-Vinas
  • Gernot Segelbacher
  • Linda Laikre
  • Cristiano Vernesi

Their publications often appear in the following venues:

  • Conservation Genetics
  • Evolutionary Applications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Conservation
  • Ecology Letters

Notable recent papers by Joachim Mergeay include:

  • Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved, 2020, Biological Conservation
  • Global genetic diversity status and trends: towards a suite of Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) for genetic composition, 2022, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Global Commitments to Conserving and Monitoring Genetic Diversity Are Now Necessary and Feasible, 2021, BioScience
  • Genetic diversity is considered important but interpreted narrowly in country reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Current actions and indicators are insufficient, 2021, Biological Conservation
  • Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies, 2021, Nature Reviews Genetics

Best Publications

  • Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved

    Sean Hoban;Michael Bruford;Josephine D'Urban Jackson;Margarida Lopes-Fernandes

  • Drivers of population genetic differentiation in the wild: isolation by dispersal limitation, isolation by adaptation and isolation by colonization

    Luisa Orsini;Joost Vanoverbeke;Ine Swillen;Joachim Mergeay;Joachim Mergeay

  • Global genetic diversity status and trends: towards a suite of Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) for genetic composition

    Unknown

  • Invasion of an asexual American water flea clone throughout Africa and rapid displacement of a native sibling species

    Joachim Mergeay;Dirk Verschuren;Luc De Meester

  • Rapid genetic adaptation precedes the spread of an exotic plant species

    Katrien Vandepitte;Tim de Meyer;Kenny Helsen;Kasper van Acker

  • Lack of phylogeographic structure in the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa suggests global dispersal

    Ineke van Gremberghe;Frederik Leliaert;Joachim Mergeay;Joachim Mergeay;Pieter Vanormelingen

  • Genetic diversity is considered important but interpreted narrowly in country reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Current actions and indicators are insufficient

    Sean Hoban;Sean Hoban;Catriona D. Campbell;Jessica M. da Silva;Robert Ekblom;Robert Ekblom

  • Landscape genomics and a common garden trial reveal adaptive differentiation to temperature across Europe in the tree species Alnus glutinosa.

    Hanne De Kort;Katrien Vandepitte;Hans Henrik Bruun;Déborah Closset-Kopp

  • Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies

    Deborah M Leigh;Charles B van Rees;Katie L Millette;Martin F Breed;Martin F Breed

  • Cyclical Parthenogenesis in Daphnia: Sexual Versus Asexual Reproduction

    Ellen Decaestecker;Luc De Meester;Joachim Mergeay

  • Revision of the Old World Daphnia ( Ctenodaphnia ) similis group Cladocera: Daphniidae)

    Ekaterina V. Popova;Adam Petrusek;Vladimír Kořínek;Joachim Mergeay

  • Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis).

    Rein Brys;David Halfmaerten;Sabrina Neyrinck;Quentin Mauvisseau

  • A cryptic invasion within an invasion and widespread introgression in the European water frog complex: consequences of uncontrolled commercial trade and weak international legislation

    G. Holsbeek;J. Mergeay;H. Hotz;J. Plötner

  • The role of selection in driving landscape genomic structure of the waterflea Daphnia magna.

    Luisa Orsini;Joachim Mergeay;Joachim Mergeay;Joost Vanoverbeke;Luc De Meester

  • The contribution of mating system variation to reproductive isolation in two closely related Centaurium species (Gentianaceae) with a generalized flower morphology

    Rein Brys;Rein Brys;An Vanden Broeck;Joachim Mergeay;Hans Jacquemyn

  • Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale

    Ivan Paz-Vinas;Evelyn L Jensen;Laura D Bertola;Martin F Breed

  • The genetic legacy of polyploid Bolivian Daphnia: the tropical Andes as a source for the North and South American D. pulicaria complex

    Joachim Mergeay;Ximena Aguilera;Steven Declerck;Adam Petrusek

  • Cryptic invasion and dispersal of an American Daphnia in East Africa

    Joachim Mergeay;Dirk Verschuren;Luc De Meester

  • How to Maximally Support Local and Regional Biodiversity in Applied Conservation? Insights from Pond Management

    Pieter Lemmens;Joachim Mergeay;Joachim Mergeay;Tom De Bie;Jeroen Van Wichelen

  • Extinction, recolonization, and dispersal through time in a planktonic crustacean.

    Joachim Mergeay;Joost Vanoverbeke;Dirk Verschuren;Luc De Meester

  • Effective population size remains a suitable, pragmatic indicator of genetic diversity for all species, including forest trees

    S Hoban;I Paz-Vinas;S Aitken;LD Bertola

  • Local and regional founder effects in lake zooplankton persist after thousands of years despite high dispersal potential.

    Marc Ventura;Marc Ventura;A. Petrusek;Alexandre Miró;E. Hamrová

Frequent Co-Authors

Luc De Meester
Luc De Meester Freie Universität Berlin
Sean Hoban
Sean Hoban Morton Arboretum
Margaret E. Hunter
Margaret E. Hunter United States Geological Survey
Rein Brys
Rein Brys Research Institute for Nature and Forest
Gernot Segelbacher
Gernot Segelbacher University of Freiburg
Robby Stoks
Robby Stoks KU Leuven
Dirk Verschuren
Dirk Verschuren Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse careers, some of which intersect with fields like psychology, counseling, and forensic science. If you’re interested in flexible learning options, many universities now offer a wide range of online degree programs to match your career goals.

For those seeking to quickly enter a helping profession, consider researching the fastest online counseling degree options. These programs can prepare you for impactful roles supporting mental health in various settings.

If you’re fascinated by crime, law, or behavioral science, you might ask, what can I do with a masters in forensic psychology? This field allows you to blend psychological theory with investigative work—a unique career path for those with a science background.

Those interested in youth development should look into child psychology degrees online, which provide knowledge to support children and adolescents and address today’s pressing developmental challenges.

Budget-conscious students can explore the cheapest masters in counseling to advance their education without accruing unnecessary debt.

Each of these pathways complements a foundation in Ecology and Evolution, offering interdisciplinary routes to fulfilling and versatile careers.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Mergeay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles