World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10682 10002 104 102 98 3151

Jian-Bin Li publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jian-Bin Li between 2013 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jian-Bin Li published across 14 years, from 2013 to 2026, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2025. 33 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2013 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2025. 2013: 1 publication 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 3 publications
2013 2026

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jian-Bin Li: publications per year, 2013 to 2026
Year Publications
2013 1
2014 4
2015 6
2016 9
2017 4
2018 6
2019 8
2020 19
2021 23
2022 19
2023 20
2024 20
2025 30
2026 3
Total 172
Download as CSV

Jian-Bin Li publications per year - data summary

  • Jian-Bin Li, a Psychology scholar from Education University of Hong Kong, has 172 publications recorded across 14 years, from 2013 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2013 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2025, with 30 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2013, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 12.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.3 per year counting only the 14 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 92 publications, 53% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2013-2017: 24 publications (4.8 per year); 2018-2022: 75 publications (15.0 per year); 2023-2026: 73 publications (18.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jian-Bin Li publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jian-Bin Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 98
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jian-Bin Li publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Jian-Bin Li, a Psychology scholar from Education University of Hong Kong, records 98 publications - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Jian-Bin Li, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Jian-Bin Li ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Jian-Bin Li D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jian-Bin Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Jian-Bin Li D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Jian-Bin Li, a Psychology scholar from Education University of Hong Kong, records 33 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Jian-Bin Li, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Jian-Bin Li ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Best Publications

  • Chinese public's knowledge, perceived severity, and perceived controllability of COVID-19 and their associations with emotional and behavioural reactions, social participation, and precautionary behaviour: a national survey.

    Jian Bin Li;An Yang;Kai Dou;Lin Xin Wang

  • Self-Control Moderates the Association Between Perceived Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Mental Health Problems Among the Chinese Public.

    Jian Bin Li;An Yang;Kai Dou;Rebecca Y.M. Cheung

  • The Relationship Between Presence of Meaning, Search for Meaning, and Subjective Well-Being: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis Based on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire

    Jian-Bin Li;Kai Dou;Yue Liang

  • The Heritability of Self-Control : a Meta-Analysis

    Y.E. Willems;Y.E. Willems;Y.E. Willems;N. Boesen;J. Li;C. Finkenauer

  • Parenting and Self-Control Across Early to Late Adolescence : A Three-Level Meta-Analysis

    Jian Bin Li;Yayouk E. Willems;Yayouk E. Willems;F. Marijn Stok;Maja Deković

  • Parental attachment, self-control, and depressive symptoms in Chinese and Italian adolescents: Test of a mediation model.

    Jian-Bin Li;Elisa Delvecchio;Adriana Lis;Yan-Gang Nie

  • Self-control mediates the associations between parental attachment and prosocial behavior among Chinese adolescents

    Yan-Gang Nie;Jian-Bin Li;Alexander T. Vazsonyi

  • Meaning in life, self-control and psychological distress among adolescents: A cross-national study.

    Jian-Bin Li;Silvia Salcuni;Elisa Delvecchio

  • Is individualism-collectivism associated with self-control? Evidence from Chinese and U.S. samples.

    Jian-Bin Li;Alexander T Vazsonyi;Kai Dou

  • Online Learning and Parent Satisfaction during COVID-19: Child Competence in Independent Learning as a Moderator

    Eva Yi Hung Lau;Jian-Bin Li;Kerry Lee

  • Positive coping as mediator between self-control and life satisfaction: Evidence from two Chinese samples

    Jian-Bin Li;Elisa Delvecchio;Adriana Lis;Yan-Gang Nie

  • The Association Between School Discipline and Self-Control From Preschoolers to High School Students: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis:

    Jian Bin Li;Shan Shan Bi;Yayouk E. Willems;Yayouk E. Willems;Catrin Finkenauer

  • The link between individualism-collectivism and life satisfaction among emerging adults from four countries.

    Alessandro Germani;Elisa Delvecchio;Jian‐Bin Li;Adriana Lis

  • The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Child and Adolescent Aggression: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Sisi Tao;Jianbin Li;Mengge Zhang;Pengjuan Zheng

  • Parental attachment among Chinese, Italian, and Costa Rican adolescents: A cross-cultural study

    Jian-Bin Li;Elisa Delvecchio;Diana Miconi;Silvia Salcuni

  • Why do Hong Kong parents have low intention to vaccinate their children against COVID-19? testing health belief model and theory of planned behavior in a large-scale survey

    Unknown

  • Career-related parental behaviors, adolescents' consideration of future consequences, and career adaptability: A three-wave longitudinal study.

    Yue Liang;Nan Zhou;Kai Dou;Hongjian Cao

  • Reexamining the linear and U‐shaped relationships between self‐control and emotional and behavioural problems

    Qiao-Min Situ;Jian-Bin Li;Kai Dou

  • Anger rumination partly accounts for the association between trait self-control and aggression

    Jian-Bin Li;Kai Dou;Qiao-Min Situ;Silvia Salcuni

  • Moral disengagement moderates the predicted effect of trait self-control on self-reported aggression

    Jian-Bin Li;Yan-Gang Nie;Ian D. Boardley;Qiao-Min Situ

Frequent Co-Authors

Catrin Finkenauer
Catrin Finkenauer Utrecht University
Meike Bartels
Meike Bartels Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Alexander T. Vazsonyi
Alexander T. Vazsonyi University of Kentucky
José P. Espada
José P. Espada Miguel Hernandez University
Maja Deković
Maja Deković Utrecht University
Ian D. Boardley
Ian D. Boardley University of Birmingham
Jessi L. Smith
Jessi L. Smith University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Malte Friese
Malte Friese Saarland University
Peilian Chi
Peilian Chi University of Macau

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jian-Bin Li

Recently Published Articles