World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 99 8381 321 197 102959

Janice Pogue publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janice Pogue between 1995 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janice Pogue published across 29 years, from 1995 to 2023, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 3 of the 200 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications
1995 2023

200 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janice Pogue: publications per year, 1995 to 2023
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 4
1997 6
1998 6
1999 3
2000 10
2001 7
2002 9
2003 5
2004 5
2005 9
2006 15
2007 8
2008 14
2009 10
2010 12
2011 8
2012 6
2013 14
2014 19
2015 10
2016 11
2017 1
2018 1
2019 3
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
2023 2
Total 200
Download as CSV

Janice Pogue publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice Pogue sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 197 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230 197
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Janice Pogue D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice Pogue sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 99
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Janice Pogue was affiliated with the Population Health Research Institute in Canada and contributed to the fields of medicine with a focus on surgery and cardiology. Their research primarily covered areas such as cardiac and coronary surgery techniques, cardiac anesthesia and surgical outcomes, coronary interventions and diagnostics, acute myocardial infarction research, cardiovascular disease and adiposity, blood transfusion and management, and mechanical circulatory support devices.

Their publication record included several recent papers addressing specific aspects of cardiac surgery and outcomes. These papers included:

  • Robot-assisted vs. conventional MIDCAB: A propensity-matched analysis, 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Impact of smoking on the outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, 2023, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • Does bone wax make sense in off-pump coronary surgery? A prospective randomized study, 2023, Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Janice Pogue frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Ján Gofus
  • Zdeněk Šorm
  • Martin Voborník
  • Youssef Shahin
  • Petr Smolák

Their work was published across multiple specialized venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Janice Pogue's research contributions spanned core subfields including surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, biochemistry, and biomedical engineering. This multidisciplinary approach facilitated a detailed focus on surgical techniques and outcomes related to cardiac and coronary procedures.

Throughout their career, Janice Pogue concentrated on advancing knowledge related to myocardial infarction, coronary interventions, and the management of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Their studies also encompassed evaluation of mechanical circulatory support devices and blood transfusion protocols in surgical contexts.

Best Publications

  • Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

    Stuart J. Connolly;Michael D. Ezekowitz;John Eikelboom;Jonas Oldgren

  • Effects of an angiotensin-converting -enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients

    S Yusuf;P Sleight;J Pogue

  • Telmisartan, Ramipril, or Both in Patients at High Risk for Vascular Events

    Koon K. Teo;Janice Pogue;Leanne Dyal;Ingrid Copland

  • Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

    Stuart J. Connolly;Janice Pogue;Robert G. Hart;Stefan H. Hohnloser

  • Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial.

    P J Devereaux

  • Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial.

    S Connolly;J Pogue;R Hart

  • Vitamin E supplementation and cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

    Yusuf S;Dagenais G;Pogue J;Bosch J

  • Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial.

    rosiglitazone Medication Trial Investigators;H C Gerstein;S Yusuf

  • Homocysteine Lowering with Folic Acid and B Vitamins in Vascular Disease

    Eva Lonn;Salim Yusuf;J. Arnold;Janice Pogue

  • Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: A systematic overview of data from individual patients

    Marcus D. Flather;Salim Yusuf;Lars Køber;Marc Pfeffer

  • Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril, or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial

    Johannes F. E. Mann;Roland E Schmieder;Matthew McQueen;Leanne Dyal

  • Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia

    Origin Trial Investigators;Hertzel C Gerstein;Jackie Bosch;Gilles R Dagenais

  • Renal insufficiency as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and the impact of ramipril: the HOPE randomized trial

    J.F.E Mann;H.C Gerstein;J Pogue;J Bosch

  • Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta-regression analysis of prospective studies

    Lawrence de Koning;Anwar T Merchant;Janice Pogue;Sonia S Anand;Sonia S Anand

  • Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes.

    Salim Yusuf;Shamir R. Mehta;Susan Chrolavicius;Rizwan Afzal

  • Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: An analysis of the RE-LY trial

    Lars Wallentin;Salim Yusuf;Michael D Ezekowitz;Marco Alings

  • Effects of long-term vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular events and cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

    Eva Lonn;Jackie Bosch;Salim Yusuf;Patrick Sheridan

  • Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomised controlled trial.

    S Yusuf;K Teo;C Anderson

  • Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators.

    R. S. McKelvie;S. Yusuf;D. Pericak;A. Avezum

  • Benefit of Oral Anticoagulant Over Antiplatelet Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Depends on the Quality of International Normalized Ratio Control Achieved by Centers and Countries as Measured by Time in Therapeutic Range

    Stuart J. Connolly;Janice Pogue;John Eikelboom;Gregory Flaker

Frequent Co-Authors

Salim Yusuf
Salim Yusuf McMaster University
Stuart J. Connolly
Stuart J. Connolly McMaster University
John W. Eikelboom
John W. Eikelboom Population Health Research Institute
Jackie Bosch
Jackie Bosch McMaster University
Eva Lonn
Eva Lonn McMaster University
Gilles R. Dagenais
Gilles R. Dagenais Université Laval
Hertzel C. Gerstein
Hertzel C. Gerstein McMaster University
Alvaro Avezum
Alvaro Avezum Population Health Research Institute
Koon K. Teo
Koon K. Teo McMaster University
Lars Wallentin
Lars Wallentin Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean following the traditional pre-med or MD route. There are now many flexible online programs and diverse healthcare careers available. For example, direct-entry MSN programs for non-nurses online allow those with a bachelor’s degree in another field to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles. This can be a great solution for career changers seeking a fast track into healthcare.

Interested in nursing, but worried about competitive admissions? Consider researching what’s the easiest nursing program to get into? Some schools offer more accessible options, making it simpler for aspiring nurses to start their journey.

Not every healthcare professional works in direct patient care. Behind the scenes, medical billing and coding schools with financial aid offer quick entry into a growing admin-focused field, often with flexible, online study options.

Finally, if you want to avoid standardized admissions tests, you can look into nursing schools that don’t require TEAS. These programs can streamline admissions and help you launch your healthcare career faster.

Best Scientists Citing Janice Pogue

Recently Published Articles