World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
14998
World Ranking
8039
National Ranking
542

James E. Marcia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Marcia sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 59 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

James E. Marcia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Marcia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James E. Marcia is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with focused subfields including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Clinical Psychology.

Their work covers key topics such as:

  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

James E. Marcia collaborates with several researchers, notably frequently co-authoring with Jane Kroger.

Best Publications

  • Development and validation of ego-identity status.

    James E. Marcia

  • Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: A meta-analysis

    Jane Kroger;Monica Martinussen;James E. Marcia

  • The Identity Statuses: Origins, Meanings, and Interpretations

    Jane Kroger;James E. Marcia

  • The Ego Identity Status Approach to Ego Identity

    James E. Marcia

  • Identity and Psychosocial Development in Adulthood

    James E. Marcia

  • Ego identity status: relationship to change in self‐esteem, “general maladjustment,” and authoritarianism

    James E. Marcia

  • Ego identity status and the intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood.

    Jacob L. Orlofsky;James E. Marcia;Ira M. Lesser

  • Moratorium-achievement (MAMA) cycles in lifespan identity development: value orientations and reasoning system correlates.

    Joanne Stephen;Eugene Fraser;James E. Marcia

  • Ego identity status in college women.

    James E. Marcia;Meredith L. Friedman

  • The Status of the Statuses: Research Review

    James E. Marcia

  • Identity six years after: A follow-up study.

    James E. Marcia

  • The empirical study of ego identity.

    James E. Marcia

  • Meta-Analytic Studies of Identity Status and the Relational Issues of Attachment and Intimacy

    Annie K. Årseth;Jane Kroger;Monica Martinussen;James E. Marcia

  • Eriksonian personality research and its implications for psychotherapy.

    James Marcia;Ruthellen Josselson

  • Attitudes toward premarital intercourse in determining ego identity status in college women.

    Susi Schenkel;James E. Marcia

  • Ego Identity, Intimacy, Sex Role Orientation, and Gender.

    Don G. Schiedel;James E. Marcia

  • Some Directions for the Investigation of Ego Development in Early Adolescence

    James E. Marcia

  • Identity and intervention.

    James E. Marcia

  • Common Processes Underlying Ego Identity, Cognitive/Moral Development, and Individuation

    Unknown

  • The relational roots of identity.

    James E. Marcia

  • Ego identity status and response to conformity pressure in college women.

    Nancy L. Toder;James E. Marcia

Frequent Co-Authors

Jane Kroger
Jane Kroger University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Monica Martinussen
Monica Martinussen University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in psychology, there are several related online degrees and professional pathways worth exploring. Social work, for example, is a closely allied field that empowers individuals and communities alike. Many universities in the United States offer flexible online programs in this area, helping students to develop counseling, advocacy, and intervention skills—highly valuable alongside a psychology background.

Students interested in diverse career opportunities may want to review the best social work degree programs in Idaho for robust online and hybrid options. Regionally, learners might also consider the top social work programs in Jackson, known for their community-focused curriculum, or explore the top social work programs in Louisiana for specialized concentrations.

If your interests lean toward urban community health or crisis intervention, examining the top social work degrees in Memphis can reveal unique practicum experiences in metropolitan settings. With these options, pursuing an online degree in social work or psychology unlocks career pathways in healthcare, education, social services, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Marcia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles