| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering | 43 | 1681 | 648 | 88 | 11450 |
The chart shows the history of publications by James C. Keck between 1952 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James C. Keck published across 71 years, from 1952 to 2022, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1962. 1 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.
117 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1952 | 3 |
| 1953 | 0 |
| 1954 | 1 |
| 1955 | 1 |
| 1956 | 2 |
| 1957 | 0 |
| 1958 | 2 |
| 1959 | 1 |
| 1960 | 1 |
| 1961 | 2 |
| 1962 | 5 |
| 1963 | 4 |
| 1964 | 3 |
| 1965 | 1 |
| 1966 | 2 |
| 1967 | 2 |
| 1968 | 5 |
| 1969 | 2 |
| 1970 | 4 |
| 1971 | 2 |
| 1972 | 3 |
| 1973 | 3 |
| 1974 | 3 |
| 1975 | 2 |
| 1976 | 2 |
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 2 |
| 1979 | 2 |
| 1980 | 4 |
| 1981 | 5 |
| 1982 | 2 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 1 |
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 3 |
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 2 |
| 1990 | 2 |
| 1991 | 2 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 1 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1 |
| 1998 | 3 |
| 1999 | 2 |
| 2000 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0 |
| 2003 | 3 |
| 2004 | 2 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 2 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 2 |
| 2012 | 2 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1 |
| Total | 117 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Keck sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 88 publications — 4th percentile
4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 10 | |
| 57–66 | 23 | |
| 67–76 | 32 | |
| 77–86 | 62 | |
| 87–96 | 67 | 88 |
| 97–106 | 91 | |
| 107–116 | 113 | |
| 117–126 | 115 | |
| 127–136 | 130 | |
| 137–146 | 140 | |
| 147–156 | 155 | |
| 157–166 | 132 | |
| 167–176 | 133 | |
| 177–186 | 130 | |
| 187–196 | 140 | |
| 197–206 | 115 | |
| 207–216 | 125 | |
| 217–226 | 117 | |
| 227–236 | 99 | |
| 237–246 | 92 | |
| 247–256 | 100 | |
| 257–266 | 95 | |
| 267–276 | 88 | |
| 277–286 | 77 | |
| 287–296 | 74 | |
| 297–306 | 74 | |
| 307–316 | 62 | |
| 317–326 | 70 | |
| 327–336 | 59 | |
| 337–346 | 58 | |
| 347–356 | 45 | |
| 357–366 | 44 | |
| 367–376 | 36 | |
| 377–386 | 41 | |
| 387–396 | 32 | |
| 397–406 | 23 | |
| 407–416 | 28 | |
| 417–426 | 27 | |
| 427–436 | 25 | |
| 437–446 | 23 | |
| 447–456 | 23 | |
| 457–466 | 20 | |
| 467–476 | 12 | |
| 477–486 | 24 | |
| 487–496 | 18 | |
| 497–506 | 12 | |
| 507–516 | 13 | |
| 517–526 | 21 | |
| 527–536 | 12 | |
| 537–546 | 8 | |
| 547–556 | 16 | |
| 557–566 | 3 | |
| 567–576 | 11 | |
| 577–586 | 6 | |
| 587–596 | 5 | |
| 597–606 | 6 | |
| 607–616 | 7 | |
| 617–626 | 7 | |
| 627–636 | 10 | |
| 637–646 | 4 | |
| 647–656 | 3 | |
| 657–658 | 2 | |
| 659+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Keck sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 43 D-Index — 51st percentile
51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 83 | |
| 31 | 113 | |
| 32 | 144 | |
| 33 | 153 | |
| 34 | 189 | |
| 35 | 158 | |
| 36 | 139 | |
| 37 | 127 | |
| 38 | 130 | |
| 39 | 126 | |
| 40 | 104 | |
| 41 | 100 | |
| 42 | 107 | |
| 43 | 101 | 43 |
| 44 | 103 | |
| 45 | 79 | |
| 46 | 88 | |
| 47 | 70 | |
| 48 | 83 | |
| 49 | 44 | |
| 50 | 64 | |
| 51 | 56 | |
| 52 | 50 | |
| 53 | 48 | |
| 54 | 58 | |
| 55 | 52 | |
| 56 | 48 | |
| 57 | 42 | |
| 58 | 34 | |
| 59 | 42 | |
| 60 | 37 | |
| 61 | 42 | |
| 62 | 44 | |
| 63 | 22 | |
| 64 | 33 | |
| 65 | 29 | |
| 66 | 23 | |
| 67 | 29 | |
| 68 | 24 | |
| 69 | 19 | |
| 70 | 34 | |
| 71 | 26 | |
| 72 | 19 | |
| 73 | 18 | |
| 74 | 19 | |
| 75 | 14 | |
| 76 | 19 | |
| 77 | 8 | |
| 78 | 18 | |
| 79 | 16 | |
| 80 | 12 | |
| 81 | 17 | |
| 82 | 11 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 7 | |
| 85 | 9 | |
| 86 | 8 | |
| 87 | 6 | |
| 88 | 6 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 10 | |
| 91 | 4 | |
| 92 | 4 | |
| 93+ | 100 |
James C. Keck was affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States. Their career was distinguished by contributions within an academic and research context centered at this institution.
There are no available records of recent papers authored by James C. Keck, nor details of specific publication venues where their work appeared. Likewise, information regarding frequent co-authors, specific fields or subfields of study, and main research topics is not present in the accessible data.
No book publications or awards linked to James C. Keck were reported in the current dataset. The absence of documented papers, co-authors, and fields of study limits a detailed mapping of their research focus and collaborative network.
The scientist was recorded as deceased, and the profile reflects their career in the past tense accordingly.
Mohamad Metghalchi;James C. Keck
George A. Lavoie;John B. Heywood;James C. Keck
M. Metghalchi;J.C. Keck
Shigeyuki Tanaka;Ferran Ayala;James C. Keck;John B. Heywood
Norman C. Blizard;James C. Keck
Shigeyuki Tanaka;Ferran Ayala;James C. Keck
James C. Keck
James Keck;George Carrier
James C. Keck
B.E. Milton;J.C. Keck
Peter Mansbach;James Keck
James C. Keck;David Gillespie
James C. Keck
G.P. Beretta;M. Rashidi;J.C. Keck
James Keck
Haoran Hu;James Keck
James C. Keck;John B. Heywood;Georg Noske
Unknown
Colin R. Ferguson;James C. Keck
Colin R. Ferguson;James C. Keck
Rodney J. Tabaczynski;John B. Heywood;James C. Keck
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways beyond traditional Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering roles. For instance, interdisciplinary programs like 5 year speech pathology programs offer an alternative route for those interested in combining technical knowledge with healthcare.
Understanding various career options is crucial, as certain professions linked with engineering have distinct educational and salary considerations. For example, becoming an FBI profiler involves unique training and offers a competitive fbi profiler salary that reflects the profession’s specialized nature.
If you are more inclined towards the human sciences, learning about different types of counseling degrees can help identify programs that align well with your interests and skill set. These degrees often lead to fulfilling roles that emphasize problem-solving and interpersonal communication.
For those looking to transition careers or seeking flexible options, exploring accredited easiest counseling degree programs could be beneficial. They provide a practical way to gain credentials and enter counseling fields with a manageable learning curve.
