World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Poland
2022

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
53
Citations
7962
World Ranking
3503
National Ranking
7

Jacek Tejchman publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Tejchman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 289 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Jacek Tejchman D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Tejchman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2022 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Poland Leader Award

Overview

Jacek Tejchman is affiliated with Gdańsk University of Technology in Poland and has produced a significant body of research primarily in the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science. Their work focuses substantially on Computational Mechanics, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Mechanics of Materials, along with contributions to related subfields involving management, monitoring, and policy aspects as well as materials chemistry.

The researcher's studies have addressed various topics including landslides and related hazards, rock mechanics and modeling, fluid dynamics simulations and interactions, granular flow and fluidized beds, high-velocity impact and material behavior, geophysical methods and applications, and geotechnical engineering and soil mechanics.

Frequent publication venues where Jacek Tejchman's work appears include:

  • Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • Granular Matter
  • Acta Geotechnica
  • Powder Technology
  • International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Meso-mechanical modelling of damage in concrete using discrete element method with porous ITZs of defined width around aggregates," 2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • "Comparative DEM calculations of fracture process in concrete considering real angular and artificial spherical aggregates," 2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • "3D DEM simulations of monotonic interface behaviour between cohesionless sand and rigid wall of different roughness," 2020, Acta Geotechnica
  • "Comparative 3D DEM simulations of sand-structure interfaces with similarly shaped clumps versus spheres with contact moments," 2021, Acta Geotechnica
  • "Effect of gas content in macropores on hydraulic fracturing in rocks using a fully coupled DEM/CFD approach," 2020, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics

The scientist collaborates frequently with co-authors including Michał Nitka, M. Krzaczek, Aleksander Grabowski, M. Wójcik, and J. Krzyżanowski. These collaborations contribute to interdisciplinary approaches across computational mechanics and geotechnical research areas.

Best Publications

  • Modelling of concrete fracture at aggregate level using FEM and DEM based on X-ray μCT images of internal structure

    Ł. Skarżyński;M. Nitka;J. Tejchman

  • Modelling of concrete behaviour in uniaxial compression and tension with DEM

    Michał Nitka;Jacek Tejchman

  • A three-dimensional meso-scale approach to concrete fracture based on combined DEM with X-ray μCT images

    M. Nitka;J. Tejchman

  • Numerical study on patterning of shear bands in a Cosserat continuum

    J. Tejchman;W. Wu

  • Numerical Simulation of Shear Band Formation with a Polar Hypoplastic Constitutive Model

    J. Tejchman;E. Bauer

  • Discrete element method simulations of fracture in concrete under uniaxial compression based on its real internal structure

    Jan Suchorzewski;Jacek Tejchman;Michał Nitka

  • Experimental Investigations of Fracture Process in Concrete by Means of X-ray Micro-computed Tomography

    Ł. Skarżyński;J. Tejchman

  • Application of particle image velocimetry (PIV) for deformation measurement during granular silo flow

    Cezary Slominski;Maciej Niedostatkiewicz;Jacek Tejchman

  • Shearing of a narrow granular layer with polar quantities

    J. Tejchman;G. Gudehus

  • Calculations of fracture process zones on meso-scale in notched concrete beams subjected to three-point bending

    Ł. Skarżyński;J. Tejchman

  • Discrete simulations of a triaxial compression test for sand by DEM

    Jan Kozicki;Jacek Tejchman;Hans-Bernd Mühlhaus

  • Experimental investigations of size effect in reinforced concrete beams failing by shear

    E. Syroka-Korol;J. Tejchman

  • Measurements and Calculations of the Width of the Fracture Process Zones on the Surface of Notched Concrete Beams

    Ł. Skarżyński;E. Syroka;J. Tejchman

  • A three-dimensional meso-scale modelling of concrete fracture, based on cohesive elements and X-ray μCT images

    W. Trawiński;J. Tejchman;J. Bobiński

  • Experimental and numerical study of sand–steel interfaces

    Jacek Tejchman;Wei Wu

  • Two-dimensional simulations of concrete fracture at aggregate level with cohesive elements based on X-ray μCT images

    Wojciech Trawiński;Jerzy Bobiński;Jacek Tejchman

  • FE analysis of failure behaviour of reinforced concrete columns under eccentric compression

    T. Majewski;J. Bobinski;J. Tejchman

  • Discrete simulations of shear zone patterning in sand in earth pressure problems of a retaining wall

    Ł. Widuliński;J. Tejchman;J. Kozicki;D. Leśniewska

  • Silo-music and silo-quake experiments and a numerical Cosserat approach

    J. Tejchman;G. Gudehus

  • Continuous and Discontinuous Modelling of Fracture in Concrete Using FEM

    Jacek Tejchman;Jerzy Bobinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Muhlhaus
Hans Muhlhaus University of Queensland
Zenon Mróz
Zenon Mróz Polish Academy of Sciences
Itai Einav
Itai Einav University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Engineering and Technology education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with flexible online programs opening up new possibilities for students from all backgrounds. For those seeking quick entry or advancement in the workforce, exploring the best certifications for jobs can offer focused skill development and pave the way to high-paying positions.

Online programs are especially valuable for learners who must balance education with family or work commitments. For instance, online school for moms provides flexible options that support both professional growth and personal responsibilities.

Accelerated learning is another key trend, allowing students to complete courses in shorter timeframes. Many institutions now offer 6 week college courses online, helping learners quickly gain new expertise or credentials. Those with a keen interest in finance can also benefit from accelerated online finance degree programs tailored for rapid career advancement.

Whether you are a working adult, a parent, or a recent graduate, these flexible pathways make studying Engineering and Technology in the USA more accessible and career-focused than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Jacek Tejchman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles