World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ioannis Evdokimidis

Ioannis Evdokimidis

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
5916
World Ranking
8341
National Ranking
5

Ioannis Evdokimidis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ioannis Evdokimidis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ioannis Evdokimidis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ioannis Evdokimidis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ioannis Evdokimidis is affiliated with Eginition Hospital in Greece and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, focusing particularly on Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. Their research spans several interconnected subfields, including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The main topics of their work cover a range of neurobiological and neurodegenerative conditions, including:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

Evdokimidis has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, notably Constantin Potagas, Efstratios Karavasilis, Georgios Velonakis, Ioannis Zalonis, and Dimitrios Kasselimis.

Their publications appear in a variety of journals, with recurrent contributions to Frontiers in Psychology and Applied Neuropsychology Adult. Other venues include Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, and Life.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Evdokimidis include:

  • The Role of the Right Hemisphere White Matter Tracts in Chronic Aphasic Patients After Damage of the Language Tracts in the Left Hemisphere, 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Neurometabolic Alterations in Motor Neuron Disease: Insights from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, 2022, Journal of Integrative Neuroscience
  • Hippocampal Metabolic Alterations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study, 2023, Life
  • Face-Name Associative Memory Performance Among Cognitively Healthy Individuals, Individuals With Subjective Memory Complaints, and Patients With a Diagnosis of aMCI, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Specific disruption of the ventral anterior temporo-frontal network reveals key implications for language comprehension and cognition, 2022, Communications Biology

This body of work demonstrates a focus on understanding brain function and pathology using advanced neuroimaging and spectroscopic methods, with applications in language processing, motor neuron diseases, and cognitive impairment.

Best Publications

  • Factorial Composition of Self-Rated Schizotypal Traits Among Young Males Undergoing Military Training

    Nicholas C. Stefanis;Nikolaos Smyrnis;Dimitrios Avramopoulos;Ioannis Evdokimidis

  • Impact of schizophrenia candidate genes on schizotypy and cognitive endophenotypes at the population level

    N.C. Stefanis;T.A. Trikalinos;D. Avramopoulos;N. Smyrnis

  • Variation in catechol-o-methyltransferase val158 met genotype associated with schizotypy but not cognition: A population study in 543 young men

    Nicholas C. Stefanis;Nicholas C. Stefanis;Jim Van Os;Dimitrios Avramopoulos;Nikolaos Smyrnis;Nikolaos Smyrnis

  • Higher scores of self reported schizotypy in healthy young males carrying the COMT high activity allele.

    D. Avramopoulos;N. C. Stefanis;I. Hantoumi;N. Smyrnis;N. Smyrnis

  • The antisaccade task in a sample of 2,006 young men. I. Normal population characteristics.

    Evdokimidis I;Smyrnis N;Constantinidis Ts;Stefanis Nc

  • Alterations of T cell subsets in ALS: a systemic immune activation?

    M. Rentzos;E. Evangelopoulos;E. Sereti;V. Zouvelou

  • Short-term and working memory impairments in aphasia.

    Constantin Potagas;Dimitrios Kasselimis;Dimitrios Kasselimis;Ioannis Evdokimidis

  • The antisaccade task in a sample of 2,006 young males. II. Effects of task parameters.

    Smyrnis N;Evdokimidis I;Stefanis Nc;Constantinidis Ts

  • COMT Val158Met moderation of stress-induced psychosis

    Nicholas C. Stefanis;Cécile Henquet;Dimitrios Avramopoulos;Nikolaos Smyrnis;Nikolaos Smyrnis

  • Effect of COMT Val158Met polymorphism on the Continuous Performance Test, Identical Pairs Version: tuning rather than improving performance.

    Nicholas C. Stefanis;Jim van Os;Dimitrios Avramopoulos;Nikolaos Smyrnis

  • Gaze stabilization by optokinetic reflex (OKR) and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during active head rotation in man

    G Schweigart;T Mergner;I Evdokimidis;S Morand

  • Effect of schizotypy on cognitive performance and its tuning by COMT val158 met genotype variations in a large population of young men.

    Nikolaos Smyrnis;Nikolaos Smyrnis;Dimitrios Avramopoulos;Ioannis Evdokimidis;Costas N. Stefanis

  • Clinical and Radiological Markers of Extra-Motor Deficits in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

    Foteini Christidi;Efstratios Karavasilis;Michail Rentzos;Nikolaos Kelekis

  • Prevalence of major depression in ALS: Comparison of a semi-structured interview and four self-report measures

    Panagiotis Ferentinos;Thomas Paparrigopoulos;Michael Rentzos;Vassiliki Zouvelou

  • Frontal lobe dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

    I Evdokimidis;T.S Constantinidis;P Gourtzelidis;N Smyrnis

  • Antisaccade performance of 1,273 men: effects of schizotypy, anxiety, and depression.

    Nikolaos Smyrnis;Ioannis Evdokimidis;Nicholas C. Stefanis;Dimitrios Avramopoulos

  • A neural model of decision-making by the superior colicullus in an antisaccade task

    Vassilis Cutsuridis;Nikolaos Smyrnis;Ioannis Evdokimidis;Stavros Perantonis

  • Hippocampal pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: selective vulnerability of subfields and their associated projections

    Foteini Christidi;Efstratios Karavasilis;Michail Rentzos;Georgios Velonakis

  • Cortical potentials with antisaccades

    I. Evdokimidis;D. Liakopoulos;T.S. Constantinidis;C. Papageorgiou

  • Speed-accuracy trade-off in the performance of pointing movements in different directions in two-dimensional space

    N. Smyrnis;I. Evdokimidis;T.S. Constantinidis;G. Kastrinakis

  • CSF biomarkers β-amyloid, tau proteins and a-synuclein in the differential diagnosis of Parkinson-plus syndromes.

    Vasilios C. Constantinides;George P. Paraskevas;Evangelia Emmanouilidou;Olga Petropoulou

  • The unbridged gap between clinical diagnosis and contemporary research on aphasia: A short discussion on the validity and clinical utility of taxonomic categories

    Dimitrios S. Kasselimis;Panagiotis G. Simos;Christos Peppas;Ioannis Evdokimidis

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikolaos Smyrnis
Nikolaos Smyrnis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Dimitrios Avramopoulos
Dimitrios Avramopoulos Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Costas N. Stefanis
Costas N. Stefanis Mental Health Research Institute
Panagiotis G. Simos
Panagiotis G. Simos University of Crete
John P. A. Ioannidis
John P. A. Ioannidis Stanford University
Peter Bede
Peter Bede Trinity College Dublin
Thomas A Trikalinos
Thomas A Trikalinos Brown University
Stavros J. Perantonis
Stavros J. Perantonis Demokritos National Centre for Scientific Research
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Elisabeth A. Wilde
Elisabeth A. Wilde Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience as a field opens doors to a variety of online academic programs and career options in the USA. Many students pursue specialized graduate paths, such as an online psyd program, which combines neuroscience with clinical psychology, preparing graduates for advanced research or therapeutic practice.

For those interested in therapy and counseling, an online mft program (Marriage and Family Therapy) provides a streamlined route into the mental health sector. These programs are often flexible, making them suitable for working professionals looking to specialize or shift career focus.

Students who are eager to enter the workforce quickly may consider enrolling in one of the many accelerated degree programs now available online. These allow for a faster path to graduation without sacrificing academic rigor.

Additionally, if future earning potential is a priority, it’s wise to explore high paying degrees. Combining neuroscience with high-demand fields like data science, pharmacology, or AI can lead to rewarding and lucrative career trajectories.

Best Scientists Citing Ioannis Evdokimidis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles