World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
14227
World Ranking
3686
National Ranking
2068

Hans H. Strupp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans H. Strupp sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 235 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Hans H. Strupp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans H. Strupp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1987 - APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research
  • 1975 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Hans H. Strupp was affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their professional career included contributions recognized by notable awards within the scientific community.

Among the awards received were the APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research in 1987 and the status of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1975.

There are no listed publications, frequent co-authors, or specific research topics provided in the available data. Similarly, information on main or subfields of study and publication venues is not indicated.

While the detailed content of Hans H. Strupp's research output is not available, the recognition through awards signals engagement in applied research with professional contributions acknowledged by peers in psychology and science advancement.

Best Publications

  • Specific vs Nonspecific Factors in Psychotherapy: A Controlled Study of Outcome

    Hans H. Strupp;Suzanne W. Hadley

  • A Tripartite Model of Mental Health and Therapeutic Outcomes with Special Reference to Negative Effects in Psychotherapy.

    Hans H. Strupp;Suzanne W. Hadley

  • Patient and therapist introject, interpersonal process, and differential psychotherapy outcome.

    William P. Henry;Thomas E. Schacht;Hans H. Strupp

  • Effects of Training in Time-Limited Dynamic Psychotherapy: Changes in Therapist Behavior.

    William P. Henry;Hans H. Strupp;Stephen F. Butler;Thomas E. Schacht

  • The Vanderbilt Psychotherapy Process Scale: a report on the scale development and a process-outcome study.

    Stephanie S. O'Malley;Chong S. Suh;Hans H. Strupp

  • Patients view their psychotherapy

    Hans H. Strupp;Ronald E. Fox;Ken Lessler

  • Psychotherapy for better or worse: The problem of negative effects

    Hans H. Strupp;Suzanne W. Hadley;Beverly Gomes-Schwartz

  • The therapeutic alliance as interpersonal process.

    William P. Henry;Hans H. Strupp

  • Some empirical and conceptual bases for coordinated research in psychotherapy: a critical review of issues, trends, and evidence.

    Hans H. Strupp;Allen E. Bergin

  • Structural analysis of social behavior: application to a study of interpersonal process in differential psychotherapeutic outcome.

    William P. Henry;Thomas E. Schacht;Hans H. Strupp

  • Differences in the effectiveness of psychodynamic therapists: A process-outcome study

    Lisa M. Najavits;Hans H. Strupp

  • Success and failure in time-limited psychotherapy. A systematic comparison of two cases: comparison 1

    Hans H. Strupp

  • Effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: mediators of therapists' responses to training.

    William P. Henry;Thomas E. Schacht;Hans H. Strupp;Stephen F. Butler

  • On the Limitations of Therapy Manuals

    Hans H. Strupp;Timothy Anderson

  • SPECIFIC AND NONSPECIFIC FACTORS IN PSYCHOTHERAPY: A PROBLEMATIC PARADIGM FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH

    Stephen F. Butler;Hans H. Strupp

  • Pretherapy Interpersonal Relations, Patients' Alliance, and Outcome in Brief Therapy

    Karla Moras;Hans H. Strupp

  • Success and failure in time-limited psychotherapy. Further evidence (comparison 4).

    Hans H. Strupp

  • “Negative Process”: A Recurrently Discovered and Underestimated Facet of Therapeutic Process and Outcome in the Individual Psychotherapy of Adults

    Jeffrey L. Binder;Hans H. Strupp

  • History of psychotherapy: A century of change.

    Donald K. Freedheim;Herbert J. Freudenberger;Jane W. Kessler;Stanley B. Messer

  • Measuring patient changes in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders : toward a core battery

    Hans H. Strupp;Leonard M. Horowitz;Michael J. Lambert

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen F. Butler
Stephen F. Butler Vanderbilt University
Kenneth I. Howard
Kenneth I. Howard Northwestern University
James N. Butcher
James N. Butcher University of Minnesota
Lisa M. Najavits
Lisa M. Najavits University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Leslie C. Morey
Leslie C. Morey Texas A&M University
Mary P. Koss
Mary P. Koss University of Arizona
Laurence A. Bradley
Laurence A. Bradley University of Alabama at Birmingham
Stanley B. Messer
Stanley B. Messer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens multiple online pathways for those interested in mental health careers. Many students choose to focus on becoming Licensed Professional Counselors (LPC), a role in high demand across the country.

If you are considering this career, it's important to know that requirements vary by location. For example, you can explore Orlando licensed therapist education requirements and compare them with what is needed to how to become a licensed therapist in Philadelphia.

Other regions have their own processes as well. Guidelines for how to become a licensed therapist in Phoenix and steps to becoming a licensed therapist in Pittsburgh each reflect unique local standards around education, supervised clinical hours, and state licensing exams.

Understanding these requirements helps in selecting the right online degree, gaining practical experience, and preparing for your chosen state's licensing process. These pathways also connect students to robust career options in counseling, clinical work, and community mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Hans H. Strupp