World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
6849
World Ranking
10759
National Ranking
5624

Hannah R. Snyder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannah R. Snyder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Hannah R. Snyder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannah R. Snyder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Major Depressive Disorder Is Associated With Broad Impairments on Neuropsychological Measures of Executive Function: A Meta-Analysis and Review

    Hannah R. Snyder

  • Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches.

    Hannah R. Snyder;Akira Miyake;Benjamin L. Hankin

  • Developing Cognitive Control Three Key Transitions

    Yuko Munakata;Hannah R. Snyder;Christopher H. Chatham

  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder is associated with broad impairments in executive function: A meta-analysis.

    Hannah R. Snyder;Roselinde H. Kaiser;Stacie L. Warren;Wendy Heller

  • Less-structured time in children's daily lives predicts self-directed executive functioning

    Jane E. Barker;Andrei D. Semenov;Laura Michaelson;Lindsay S. Provan

  • Strong Homotypic Continuity in Common Psychopathology-, Internalizing-, and Externalizing-Specific Factors Over Time in Adolescents

    Hannah R. Snyder;Jami F. Young;Benjamin L. Hankin

  • Understanding comorbidity among internalizing problems: Integrating latent structural models of psychopathology and risk mechanisms.

    Benjamin L. Hankin;Hannah R. Snyder;Lauren D. Gulley;Tina H. Schweizer

  • Neural inhibition enables selection during language processing

    Hannah R. Snyder;Natalie Hutchison;Erika Nyhus;Tim Curran

  • When does stress help or harm? The effects of stress controllability and subjective stress response on stroop performance.

    Roselinde Kaiser Henderson;Hannah R. Snyder;Tina Gupta;Marie T. Banich

  • Temperament factors and dimensional, latent bifactor models of child psychopathology: Transdiagnostic and specific associations in two youth samples

    Benjamin L. Hankin;Elyssia Poggi Davis;Hannah Snyder;Jami F. Young

  • Adolescent Emotionality and Effortful Control: Core Latent Constructs and Links to Psychopathology and Functioning

    Hannah R. Snyder;Lauren D. Gulley;Patricia Bijttebier;Catharina A. Hartman

  • Prefrontal Cortical Response to Conflict during Semantic and Phonological Tasks

    Hannah R. Snyder;Keith Feigenson;Sharon L. Thompson-Schill

  • Choosing our words: Retrieval and selection processes recruit shared neural substrates in left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

    Hannah R. Snyder;Marie T. Banich;Yuko Munakata

  • Becoming Self-Directed: Abstract Representations Support Endogenous Flexibility in Children.

    Hannah R. Snyder;Yuko Munakata

  • Spiraling Out of Control: Stress Generation and Subsequent Rumination Mediate the Link Between Poorer Cognitive Control and Internalizing Psychopathology

    Hannah R. Snyder;Benjamin L. Hankin

  • Transdiagnostic Mechanisms of Psychopathology in Youth: Executive Functions, Dependent Stress, and Rumination

    Hannah R Snyder;Naomi P Friedman;Benjamin L Hankin

  • Pubertal Timing as a Transdiagnostic Risk for Psychopathology in Youth

    Elissa J. Hamlat;Hannah R. Snyder;Jami F. Young;Benjamin L. Hankin

  • Associations Between Task Performance and Self-Report Measures of Cognitive Control: Shared Versus Distinct Abilities.

    Hannah R Snyder;Naomi P Friedman;Benjamin L Hankin

  • Attention Bias in Rumination and Depression: Cognitive Mechanisms and Brain Networks

    Roselinde H Kaiser;Hannah R Snyder;Franziska Goer;Rachel Clegg

  • Distinct Patterns of Reduced Prefrontal and Limbic Gray Matter Volume in Childhood General and Internalizing Psychopathology

    Hannah R. Snyder;Benjamin L. Hankin;Curt A. Sandman;Kevin Head

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin L. Hankin
Benjamin L. Hankin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Yuko Munakata
Yuko Munakata University of California, Davis
Marie T. Banich
Marie T. Banich University of Colorado Boulder
Jami F. Young
Jami F. Young Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Curt A. Sandman
Curt A. Sandman University of California, Irvine
Laura M. Glynn
Laura M. Glynn Chapman University
Elysia Poggi Davis
Elysia Poggi Davis University of Denver
Diego A. Pizzagalli
Diego A. Pizzagalli Harvard University
Wendy Heller
Wendy Heller University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Hannah R. Snyder

Recently Published Articles