World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick Rhodewalt

Frederick Rhodewalt

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
9023
World Ranking
10722
National Ranking
5606

Frederick Rhodewalt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick Rhodewalt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 59 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frederick Rhodewalt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick Rhodewalt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick Rhodewalt was affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States during their academic career. Their professional work contributed to the broader landscape of research through various scholarly activities.

Although no recent papers are documented in the available data, Rhodewalt's academic profile reflects a connection with the University of Utah, suggesting a focus on advancing knowledge within that institutional context.

There are no recorded frequent co-authors or specific publication venues linked to Rhodewalt in the provided data.

The main fields and subfields of study, as well as the principal topics of research related to Rhodewalt, are not detailed in the available information.

No book publications or awards were reported in the source data, which limits the scope of known formal recognitions or extended contributions in book formats.

Rhodewalt is noted as deceased, indicating their career and contributions to research have concluded.

Best Publications

  • Unraveling the Paradoxes of Narcissism: A Dynamic Self-Regulatory Processing Model

    Carolyn C. Morf;Frederick Rhodewalt

  • Optimism, Neuroticism, Coping, and Symptom Reports: An Alternative Interpretation of the Life Orientation Test

    Timothy W. Smith;Mary Katherine Pope;Frederick Rhodewalt;James L. Poulton

  • Self and Interpersonal Correlates of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: A Review and New Findings

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Carolyn C. Morf

  • On self-aggrandizement and anger: A temporal analysis of narcissism and affective reactions to success and failure.

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Carolyn C. Morf

  • Narcissism, Self-Knowledge Organization, and Emotional Reactivity: The Effect of Daily Experiences on Self-Esteem and Affect:

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Jennifer C. Madrian;Sharon Cheney

  • Effects of strategic self-presentation on subsequent self-esteem.

    Edward E. Jones;Frederick Rhodewalt;Steven Berglas;James A. Skelton

  • Narcissism and Self-Evaluation Maintenance: Explorations in Object Relations

    Carolyn C. Morf;Frederick Rhodewalt

  • Conceptions of Ability, Achievement Goals, and Individual Differences in Self‐Handicapping Behavior: On the Application of Implicit Theories

    Frederick Rhodewalt

  • Appraisal of life change, depression, and illness in hardy and nonhardy women.

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Joan B. Zone

  • Self-handicapping : the role of discounting and augmentation in the preservation of self-esteem

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Carolyn Morf;Susan Hazlett;Marita Fairfield

  • Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of practice in self-esteem protection.

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Andrew T. Saltzman;Jerry Wittmer

  • Distinguishing narcissism and hostility: similarities and differences in interpersonal circumplex and five-factor correlates.

    John M. Ruiz;Timothy W. Smith;Frederick Rhodewalt

  • Expanding the Dynamic Self-Regulatory Processing Model of Narcissism: Research Directions for the Future

    Carolyn C. Morf;Frederick Rhodewalt

  • Effects of self-presentation on the phenomenal self.

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Sjöfn Agustsdottir

  • The Double-Edged Sword of Self-Handicapping: Discounting, Augmentation, and the Protection and Enhancement of Self-Esteem

    David L. Feick;Frederick Rhodewalt

  • Narcissus Reflects: Memory Distortion in Response to Ego-Relevant Feedback among High- and Low-Narcissistic Men

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Stacy K. Eddings

  • Self-Handicapping and Subsequent Performance: Role of Outcome Valence and Attributional Certainty

    Frederick Rhodewalt;James Davison

  • On the relationship of hardiness to the Type A behavior pattern: Perception of life events versus coping with life events

    Frederick Rhodewalt;Sjofn Agustsdottir

  • Dissonance motivation: Its nature, persistence, and reinstatement.

    E.Tory Higgins;Frederick Rhodewalt;Mark P Zanna

  • Cognitive, behavioral, and affective correlates of the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale.

    Mary Katherine Pope;Timothy W. Smith;Frederick Rhodewalt

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy W. Smith
Timothy W. Smith University of Utah
Michael J. Strube
Michael J. Strube Washington University in St. Louis
Carol Sansone
Carol Sansone University of Utah
Joel Cooper
Joel Cooper Princeton University
Edward E. Jones
Edward E. Jones Princeton University
David M. Sanbonmatsu
David M. Sanbonmatsu University of Utah
Kathleen D. Vohs
Kathleen D. Vohs University of Minnesota
Russell H. Fazio
Russell H. Fazio The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways in the USA. One common career option is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which helps individuals develop specialized skills in behavioral analysis and intervention.

To become a BCBA, you’ll need to complete graduate-level coursework, supervised fieldwork, and pass a certification exam. Each state often has specific guidance on the steps involved. For example, you can learn about Sacramento bcba education requirements or review the Saint Paul bcba requirements for insights specific to those locations.

Other regions like how to become a bcba in San Antonio and the San Diego bcba requirements offer guidelines tailored to local opportunities and licensing regulations. These resources can help aspiring psychologists map out their educational paths and career trajectories. Pursuing an online degree can provide the flexibility needed to balance learning with work or life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick Rhodewalt