World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
36157
World Ranking
3289
National Ranking
1853

Edward E. Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward E. Jones sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 211 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edward E. Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward E. Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward E. Jones is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their academic career is connected with this institution, where they are engaged in research activities.

As of now, there are no listed recent papers authored by Edward E. Jones, nor is there information regarding frequent co-authors or publication venues associated with their work.

Details about the main fields and subfields of study, as well as specific topics of research interest, are not available for Edward E. Jones.

There is no record of book publications or awards received by this scientist in the provided data.

Best Publications

  • The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior.

    Edward E. Jones;Richard E. Nisbett

  • From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1

    Edward E. Jones;Keith E. Davis

  • Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships

    Edward Ellsworth Jones

  • The Attribution of Attitudes

    Edward E Jones;Victor A Harris

  • Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior

    Edward Ellsworth Jones

  • DRUG CHOICE AS A SELF-HANDICAPPING STRATEGY IN RESPONSE TO NONCONTINGENT SUCCESS

    Steven Berglas;Edward E. Jones

  • Foundations of Social Psychology.

    Unknown

  • Control of Attributions about the Self Through Self-handicapping Strategies: The Appeal of Alcohol and the Role of Underachievement

    Unknown

  • The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude.

    Edward E. Jones;Harold Sigall

  • Polarized appraisals of out-group members.

    Patricia W. Linville;Edward E. Jones

  • The rocky road from acts to dispositions.

    Edward E. Jones

  • The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers.

    George A. Quattrone;Edward E. Jones

  • Ingratiation : an attributional approach

    Edward Ellsworth Jones;Camille B. Wortman

  • When Self-Presentation is Constrained by the Target's Knowledge: Consistency and Compensation.

    Roy F. Baumeister;Edward E. Jones

  • Decision freedom as a determinant of the role of incentive magnitude in attitude change.

    Darwyn E. Linder;Joel Cooper;Edward E. Jones

  • Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success.

    Unknown

  • Self-promotion is not ingratiating.

    Debra K. Godfrey;Edward E. Jones;Charles G. Lord

  • Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception.

    Edward E. Jones;Keith E. Davis;Kenneth J. Gergen

  • Pattern of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect.

    Edward E. Jones;Leslie Rock;Kelly G. Shaver;George R. Goethals

  • Perceiver-Induced Constraint: Interpretations of Self-Generated Reality

    Daniel T. Gilbert;Edward E. Jones

  • Ingratiation : a social psychological analysis

    Edward Ellsworth Jones

  • Effects of strategic self-presentation on subsequent self-esteem.

    Edward E. Jones;Frederick Rhodewalt;Steven Berglas;James A. Skelton

  • Perceived Variability of Personal Characteristics in In-Groups and Out-Groups The Role of Knowledge and Evaluation

    Edward E. Jones;George C. Wood;George A. Quattrone

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Gergen
Kenneth J. Gergen Swarthmore College
Keith E. Davis
Keith E. Davis University of South Carolina
George R. Goethals
George R. Goethals University of Richmond
Daniel T. Gilbert
Daniel T. Gilbert Harvard University
Nenad Bursac
Nenad Bursac Duke University
Harold H. Kelley
Harold H. Kelley University of California, Los Angeles
Carmelo A. Milano
Carmelo A. Milano Duke University
Joel Cooper
Joel Cooper Princeton University
Richard Schulz
Richard Schulz University of Pittsburgh
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of degrees and careers. Online study options are increasingly popular, offering flexibility for those seeking work-life balance or changing careers. Common pathways include clinical psychology, counseling, and the fast-growing field of industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology.

If you are considering I-O psychology, it's important to understand the industrial organizational psychologist education requirements. Most roles require at least a master’s degree, while higher-level positions may need a doctorate.

When choosing a specialization, consider earning potential. Comparing psychologist salary vs psychiatrist can help guide your decision, as psychiatrists generally require medical school but earn higher average salaries.

For those interested in organizational work, the io psychology job outlook is very positive, with high demand in sectors like business, government, and tech.

Lastly, there are diverse career paths in industrial organizational psychology, including HR consulting, employee training, and executive coaching. Online degrees can prepare you well for these dynamic and rewarding roles.

Best Scientists Citing Edward E. Jones

Recently Published Articles