World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Belgium
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 86 725 688 13 13 453 22283

Filip Tack publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Filip Tack between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Filip Tack published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2005. 5 of the 490 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2005. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 24 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 34 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1992 2025

490 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Filip Tack: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 5
1994 1
1995 5
1996 8
1997 6
1998 8
1999 10
2000 10
2001 12
2002 18
2003 24
2004 14
2005 34
2006 15
2007 26
2008 21
2009 19
2010 29
2011 14
2012 19
2013 33
2014 19
2015 13
2016 12
2017 21
2018 27
2019 15
2020 13
2021 12
2022 16
2023 5
2024 4
2025 1
Total 490
Download as CSV

Filip Tack publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Tack sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 451–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 453 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32 453
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Filip Tack D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Tack sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29 86
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Belgium Leader Award

Overview

Filip Tack is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science, with a focus on pollution and the interactions between heavy metals and the environment. Their research contributions span a variety of specialized subfields, including pollution, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, plant science, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and geochemistry and petrology.

The scientist's primary research interests concentrate on issues related to heavy metals in the environment, plant stress responses and tolerance, and heavy metal exposure and toxicity. Additional focus areas include mercury impact and mitigation studies, geochemistry and elemental analysis, phosphorus and nutrient management, and plant micronutrient interactions and effects.

Tack has published multiple recent papers in reputed journals, showcasing varied environmental science topics:

  • "Cadmium stress in plants: A critical review of the effects, mechanisms, and tolerance strategies" (2020) in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
  • "A review of green remediation strategies for heavy metal contaminated soil" (2021) in Soil Use and Management
  • "Speciation, transportation, and pathways of cadmium in soil-rice systems: A review on the environmental implications and remediation approaches for food safety" (2021) in Environment International
  • "The beneficial and hazardous effects of selenium on the health of the soil-plant-human system: An overview" (2021) in Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • "Influence of biochar on trace element uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants and associated health risks: A critical review" (2021) in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

The scientist frequently collaborates with several colleagues, most notably:

  • Jörg Rinklebe
  • Erik Meers
  • Yong Sik Ok
  • Deyi Hou
  • Jayanta Kumar Biswas

Tack has published multiple works in notable venues, which include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment (8 publications)
  • Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (3 publications)
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (2 publications)
  • Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology (2 publications)
  • Land Degradation and Development (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • Trace metal behaviour in estuarine and riverine floodplain soils and sediments: A review

    G. Du Laing;J. Rinklebe;B. Vandecasteele;E. Meers

  • Chemical Speciation and Fractionation in Soil and Sediment Heavy Metal Analysis: A Review

    Filip Tack;Marc Verloo

  • Cadmium stress in plants: A critical review of the effects, mechanisms, and tolerance strategies

    Taoufik El Rasafi;Abdallah Oukarroum;Abdelmajid Haddioui;Hocheol Song

  • A critical review on effects, tolerance mechanisms and management of cadmium in vegetables.

    Muhammad Rizwan;Shafaqat Ali;Muhammad Adrees;Muhammad Ibrahim

  • Mercury speciation, transformation, and transportation in soils, atmospheric flux, and implications for risk management: A critical review

    David O'Connor;Deyi Hou;Yong Sik Ok;Jan Mulder

  • Nutrient recovery from digestate : systematic technology review and product classification

    Céline Vaneeckhaute;Viooltje Lebuf;Evi Michels;Evangelina Belia

  • Remediation of mercury contaminated soil, water, and air: A review of emerging materials and innovative technologies.

    Liuwei Wang;Deyi Hou;Yining Cao;Yong Sik Ok

  • Cadmium phytoremediation potential of Brassica crop species: A review

    Muhammad Rizwan;Shafaqat Ali;Muhammad Zia ur Rehman;Jörg Rinklebe

  • EDTA-assisted Pb phytoextraction

    Saifullah;E Meers;M Qadir;P de Caritat

  • The use of bio-energy crops (Zea mays) for 'phytoattenuation' of heavy metals on moderately contaminated soils: a field experiment.

    E. Meers;S. Van Slycken;Kristin Adriaensen;Ann Ruttens

  • Effect of salinity on heavy metal mobility and availability in intertidal sediments of the Scheldt estuary

    G. Du Laing;R. De Vos;B. Vandecasteele;E. Lesage

  • Phytoremediation prospects of willow stands on contaminated sediment: a field trial

    Pieter Vervaeke;S Luyssaert;Jan Mertens;Erik Meers

  • Phytoremediation for heavy metal‐contaminated soils combined with bioenergy production

    Luc Van Ginneken;Erik Meers;Ruben Guisson;Ann Ruttens

  • Phytoavailability assessment of heavy metals in soils by single extractions and accumulation by Phaseolus vulgaris

    Erik Meers;R Samson;Filip Tack;A Ruttens

  • Potential of five willow species (Salix spp.) for phytoextraction of heavy metals.

    Erik Meers;B. Vandecasteele;Ann Ruttens;Jaco Vangronsveld

  • Sustainable in situ remediation of recalcitrant organic pollutants in groundwater with controlled release materials: A review

    David O'Connor;Deyi Hou;Yong Sik Ok;Yinan Song

  • A review of green remediation strategies for heavy metal contaminated soil

    Liuwei Wang;Jörg Rinklebe;Jörg Rinklebe;Filip M. G. Tack;Deyi Hou

  • Potential of Brassic rapa, Cannabis sativa, Helianthus annuus and Zea mays for phytoextraction of heavy metals from calcareous dredged sediment derived soils

    Erik Meers;A Ruttens;M Hopgood;Els Lesage

  • Effects of a municipal solid waste compost and mineral fertilization on plant growth in two tropical agricultural soils of Mali.

    M Soumare;Filip Tack;Marc Verloo

  • Speciation, transportation, and pathways of cadmium in soil-rice systems: A review on the environmental implications and remediation approaches for food safety.

    Zhanming Li;Yi Liang;Hangwei Hu;Sabry M. Shaheen

  • Accumulation of metals in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater in Flanders, Belgium.

    E. Lesage;D.P.L. Rousseau;E. Meers;F.M.G. Tack

  • Characterization of selected element concentrations and enrichment ratios in background and anthropogenically impacted roadside areas.

    R. A. Sutherland;C. A. Tolosa;F. M. G. Tack;M. G. Verloo

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik Meers
Erik Meers Ghent University
Marc Verloo
Marc Verloo Ghent University
Gijs Du Laing
Gijs Du Laing Ghent University
Yong Sik Ok
Yong Sik Ok Korea University
Ann Ruttens
Ann Ruttens Sciensano (Belgium)
Jörg Rinklebe
Jörg Rinklebe University of Wuppertal
Peter A. Vanrolleghem
Peter A. Vanrolleghem Université Laval
Jaco Vangronsveld
Jaco Vangronsveld Hasselt University
Daniel C.W. Tsang
Daniel C.W. Tsang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Tom Van de Wiele
Tom Van de Wiele Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees that can enhance your career prospects. For those interested in advancing social work within environmental contexts, affordable online options like the dsw programs online offer flexible and accessible pathways.

If you're seeking a broader educational foundation, pursuing a cheap online general studies degree can provide versatile knowledge applicable in various environmental fields. These programs are cost-effective and designed for adaptable learning.

Students aiming for an easier transition or quick completion might consider the easiest bachelors degree options, which can help build fundamental skills before specializing further in environmental areas.

For those focused on earth sciences, enrolling in one of the online geology programs aligns closely with environmental science principles, preparing graduates for careers in resource management, conservation, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Filip Tack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles