World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
4247
World Ranking
11393
National Ranking
179

Ely Porat publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ely Porat sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 208 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ely Porat D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ely Porat sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ely Porat is a researcher affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel. Their scholarly work spans across the fields of Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a predominant focus on Artificial Intelligence, DNA and Biological Computing, and Computational Theory and Mathematics, among other areas.

The main subfields of their research include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Genetics

The principal topics addressed in their research involve:

  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • DNA and Biological Computing
  • Semigroups and Automata Theory
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
  • Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Among Ely Porat's recent publications are the following works:

  • "Avoiding Flow Size Overestimation in Count-Min Sketch With Bloom Filter Constructions" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
  • "Iterative-Free Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Using Neural Networks" (2022), published on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Locally Consistent Parsing for Text Indexing in Small Space" (2025), published in SIAM Journal on Computing
  • "Iteration-Free quantum approximate optimization algorithm using neural networks" (2024), published in Quantum Machine Intelligence
  • "An O(log^{3/2}n) Parallel Time Population Protocol for Majority with O(log n) States" (2020), published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Their work has appeared in notable publication venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
  • SIAM Journal on Computing

Ely Porat collaborates frequently with several researchers, with multiple coauthored works alongside:

  • Tsvi Kopelowitz
  • Shay Golan
  • Tomasz Kociumaka
  • Avivit Levy
  • B. Riva Shalom

Best Publications

  • Worst-case Optimal Join Algorithms

    Hung Q. Ngo;Ely Porat;Christopher Ré;Atri Rudra

  • Worst-case optimal join algorithms: [extended abstract]

    Hung Q. Ngo;Ely Porat;Christopher Ré;Atri Rudra

  • Explicit Nonadaptive Combinatorial Group Testing Schemes

    E. Porat;A. Rothschild

  • Explicit Non-Adaptive Combinatorial Group Testing Schemes.

    Ely Porat;Amir Rothschild

  • Higher lower bounds from the 3SUM conjecture

    Tsvi Kopelowitz;Seth Pettie;Ely Porat

  • Exact and Approximate Pattern Matching in the Streaming Model

    Benny Porat;Ely Porat

  • Faster algorithms for string matching with k mismatches

    Amihood Amir;Moshe Lewenstein;Ely Porat

  • Fast moment estimation in data streams in optimal space

    Daniel M. Kane;Jelani Nelson;Ely Porat;David P. Woodruff

  • Overlap matching

    Amihood Amir;Richard Cole;Ramesh Hariharan;Moshe Lewenstein

  • Fast set intersection and two-patterns matching

    Hagai Cohen;Ely Porat

  • Weight Distribution and List-Decoding Size of Reed–Muller Codes

    T. Kaufman;S. Lovett;E. Porat

  • Efficiently decodable error-correcting list disjunct matrices and applications

    Hung Q. Ngo;Ely Porat;Atri Rudra

  • An Optimal Bloom Filter Replacement Based on Matrix Solving

    Ely Porat

  • Approximate sparse recovery: optimizing time and measurements

    Anna C. Gilbert;Yi Li;Ely Porat;Martin J. Strauss

  • Pattern matching with address errors: Rearrangement distances

    Amihood Amir;Yonatan Aumann;Gary Benson;Avivit Levy

  • Improved sketching of hamming distance with error correcting

    Ely Porat;Ohad Lipsky

  • Function matching: algorithms, applications, and a lower bound

    Amihood Amir;Yonatan Aumann;Richard Cole;Moshe Lewenstein

  • Power and stability in connectivity games

    Yoram Bachrach;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein;Ely Porat

  • Pattern matching with don't cares and few errors

    Raphaël Clifford;Klim Efremenko;Ely Porat;Amir Rothschild

  • Approximate Sparse Recovery: Optimizing Time and Measurements

    Anna C. Gilbert;Yi Li;Ely Porat;Martin J. Strauss

  • Higher Lower Bounds from the 3SUM Conjecture

    Tsvi Kopelowitz;Seth Pettie;Ely Porat

  • Efficiently Decodable Error-Correcting List Disjunct Matrices and Applications - (Extended Abstract).

    Hung Q. Ngo;Ely Porat;Atri Rudra

  • Overlap matching

    Amihood Amir;Richard Cole;Ramesh Hariharan;Moshe Lewenstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Amihood Amir
Amihood Amir Bar-Ilan University
Yoram Bachrach
Yoram Bachrach DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Seth Pettie
Seth Pettie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Martin J. Strauss
Martin J. Strauss University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Atri Rudra
Atri Rudra University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Hung Q. Ngo
Hung Q. Ngo University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Anna C. Gilbert
Anna C. Gilbert Yale University
Hagai Cohen
Hagai Cohen Weizmann Institute of Science
Jeffrey S. Rosenschein
Jeffrey S. Rosenschein Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens a world of diverse online degrees and career options. For tech-focused students, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering offers hands-on skills closely related to computing and emerging digital fields. These programs balance practical knowledge with technical competencies highly sought after by employers.

Not everyone wants a four-year commitment. Many students consider quick certifications that pay well as a fast track into the tech workforce. These targeted programs, such as IT support or cybersecurity certificates, can lead to lucrative entry-level positions without a lengthy degree process.

For those seeking advanced roles, the shortest masters degree options provide a way to upskill or pivot specialties rapidly, sometimes in as little as one year. This is especially appealing for working professionals.

If you’re unsure which discipline to pursue, reviewing what masters program should I do can help you identify high-demand, valuable graduate programs tailored to your background and goals. The tech field is full of possibilities—choosing the right path can ensure a rewarding and future-proof career.

Best Scientists Citing Ely Porat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles