World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth A. Bernays

Elizabeth A. Bernays

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
17684
World Ranking
7001
National Ranking
3222

Elizabeth A. Bernays publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Bernays sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 385 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Elizabeth A. Bernays D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth A. Bernays sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth A. Bernays is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their recent research contributions include a paper titled In Praise of Looking, published in 2020 in the journal American Entomologist. This publication has been cited once.

Bernays has published primarily in the venue American Entomologist, reflecting a focused engagement with this journal's audience and themes.

Their work is characterized by a concentration on research topics relevant to entomology, although specific main fields, subfields, or thematic topics are not explicitly listed beyond this publication. There are no recorded frequent co-authors in their recent scholarly output, indicating a potential focus on independent research or collaboration outside frequently repeated partnerships.

  • In Praise of Looking, 2020, American Entomologist

Best Publications

  • Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects

    Elizabeth A. Bernays;Reginald F. Chapman

  • On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods

    Elizabeth Bernays;Michelle Graham

  • Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation.

    E. A. Bernays

  • Plant tannins and insect herbivores: an appraisal.

    E. A. Bernays

  • Self-Medication as Adaptive Plasticity: Increased Ingestion of Plant Toxins by Parasitized Caterpillars

    Michael S. Singer;Kevi C. Mace;Elizabeth A. Bernays

  • Dietary Mixing in a Generalist Herbivore: Tests of Two Hypotheses

    E. A. Bernays;K. L. Bright;N. Gonzalez;J. Angel

  • INSECT HERBIVORES: DIFFERENT REASONS FOR BEING A GENERALIST

    E. A. Bernays;O. P. J. M. Minkenberg

  • Feeding by lepidopteran larvae is dangerous.

    E. A. Bernays

  • Evolution of Feeding Behavior in Insect Herbivores

    Elizabeth A. Bernays

  • Sensory Capabilities, Information Processing, and Resource Specialization

    Elizabeth A. Bernays;William T. Wcislo

  • The value of being a resource specialist: behavioral support for a neural hypothesis.

    Bernays Ea

  • Evolution of insect morphology in relation to plants

    Elizabeth Anna Bernays

  • Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids.

    Elizabeth A. Bernays;Daniel J. Funk

  • TANNINS: AN ALTERNATIVE VIEWPOINT

    E. A. Bernays

  • When host choice is a problem for a generalist herbivore: experiments with the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci

    E. A. Bernays

  • The interplay between nutrient balancing and toxin dilution in foraging by a generalist insect herbivore

    M.S. Singer;E.A. Bernays;Y. Carrière

  • Plant phenols utilized as nutrients by a phytophagous insect.

    E. A. Bernays;S. Woodhead

  • Saturniid and Sphingid Caterpillars: Two Ways to Eat Leaves

    E. A. Bernays;D. H. Janzen

  • The Evolution of Deterrent Responses in Plant­ Feeding Insects

    Elizabeth Bernays;Reg Chapman

  • Taste Sensitivity of Insect Herbivores to Deterrents is Greater in Specialists Than in Generalists: A Behavioral Test of the Hypothesis with Two Closely Related Caterpillars

    E. A. Bernays;S. Oppenheim;R. F. Chapman;H. Kwon

Frequent Co-Authors

David Raubenheimer
David Raubenheimer University of Sydney
Stephen J. Simpson
Stephen J. Simpson University of Sydney
Ludger Witte
Ludger Witte Technische Universität Braunschweig
Fred Gould
Fred Gould North Carolina State University
Michael Wink
Michael Wink Heidelberg University
John T. Arnason
John T. Arnason University of Ottawa
Yves Carrière
Yves Carrière University of Arizona
Monique S. J. Simmonds
Monique S. J. Simmonds Royal Botanic Gardens
John G. Hildebrand
John G. Hildebrand University of Arizona
Michael M. Martin
Michael M. Martin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of allied health careers—many accessible through flexible online study. For those drawn to data and patient records, consider researching is medical coding a good job to learn about this growing field. Coding offers remote work opportunities and job stability, but it's essential to weigh the pros and cons before deciding.

If you’re interested in health records and administration, earning an online health information management degree can be a smart, affordable option. This pathway leads to careers in hospital management, insurance, and informatics.

Those passionate about nutrition science can deepen their expertise with a master degree in nutrition online. This advanced specialization supports roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, or research.

Meanwhile, practical application of biology knowledge is possible in diagnostic imaging. Discover your options through online ultrasound tech programs, which prepare students for certification and dynamic clinical jobs.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth A. Bernays

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles