World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
14050
World Ranking
3820
National Ranking
1745

Catherine Limperopoulos publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Limperopoulos sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 246 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Catherine Limperopoulos D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Limperopoulos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine Limperopoulos is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine, with significant contributions in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The scientist's work extensively covers several main topics, including:

  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Limperopoulos has published frequently in notable scientific venues such as:

  • Pediatric Research
  • Circulation
  • JAMA Network Open
  • NeuroImage
  • Cerebral Cortex

Recent papers by Limperopoulos include:

  • Association of Prenatal Maternal Psychological Distress With Fetal Brain Growth, Metabolism, and Cortical Maturation (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • Association of Maternal Psychological Distress With In Utero Brain Development in Fetuses With Congenital Heart Disease (2020, JAMA Pediatrics)
  • Association of Elevated Maternal Psychological Distress, Altered Fetal Brain, and Offspring Cognitive and Social-Emotional Outcomes at 18 Months (2022, JAMA Network Open)
  • Association of Prenatal Maternal Anxiety With Fetal Regional Brain Connectivity (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • Brain structural and functional outcomes in the offspring of women experiencing psychological distress during pregnancy (2024, Molecular Psychiatry)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Limperopoulos include:

  • Kushal Kapse
  • Nickie Andescavage
  • Josepheen De Asis-Cruz
  • Catherine Lopez
  • Adré du Plessis

Best Publications

  • Does cerebellar injury in premature infants contribute to the high prevalence of long-term cognitive, learning, and behavioral disability in survivors?

    Catherine Limperopoulos;Haim Bassan;Kimberlee Gauvreau;Richard L. Robertson

  • Brain Volume and Metabolism in Fetuses With Congenital Heart Disease Evaluation With Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy

    Catherine Limperopoulos;Wayne Tworetzky;Doff B. McElhinney;Jane W. Newburger

  • Positive Screening for Autism in Ex-preterm Infants: Prevalence and Risk Factors

    Catherine Limperopoulos;Haim Bassan;Nancy R. Sullivan;Janet S. Soul

  • Late gestation cerebellar growth is rapid and impeded by premature birth.

    Catherine Limperopoulos;Janet S. Soul;Kimberlee Gauvreau;Petra S. Huppi

  • Fluctuating pressure-passivity is common in the cerebral circulation of sick premature infants.

    Janet S Soul;Peter E Hammer;Miles Tsuji;J Philip Saul

  • Delayed Cortical Development in Fetuses with Complex Congenital Heart Disease

    C. Clouchoux;A.J. du Plessis;M. Bouyssi-Kobar;W. Tworetzky;W. Tworetzky

  • A normative spatiotemporal MRI atlas of the fetal brain for automatic segmentation and analysis of early brain growth

    Ali Gholipour;Caitlin K. Rollins;Clemente Velasco-Annis;Abdelhakim Ouaalam

  • Cerebellar hemorrhage in the preterm infant: ultrasonographic findings and risk factors.

    Catherine Limperopoulos;Carol B Benson;Haim Bassan;Donald N Disalvo

  • Impaired trophic interactions between the cerebellum and the cerebrum among preterm infants.

    Catherine Limperopoulos;Janet S. Soul;Haissam Haidar;Petra S. Huppi

  • Structure-function relationships in the developing cerebellum: Evidence from early-life cerebellar injury and neurodevelopmental disorders.

    Catherine J. Stoodley;Catherine Limperopoulos

  • Injury to the Premature Cerebellum: Outcome is Related to Remote Cortical Development

    Catherine Limperopoulos;Catherine Limperopoulos;Gevorg Chilingaryan;Nancy Sullivan;Nicolas Guizard

  • Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with cerebellar malformations: a systematic review.

    Marie-Eve Bolduc;Catherine Limperopoulos

  • Association of Prenatal Maternal Psychological Distress With Fetal Brain Growth, Metabolism, and Cortical Maturation.

    Yao Wu;Yuan-Chiao Lu;Marni Jacobs;Subechhya Pradhan

  • Neurodevelopmental outcome in survivors of periventricular hemorrhagic infarction.

    Haim Bassan;Catherine Limperopoulos;Karen Visconti;D Luisa Mayer

  • Elevated Cerebral Pressure Passivity Is Associated With Prematurity-Related Intracranial Hemorrhage

    Heather O'Leary;Matthew C Gregas;Catherine Limperopoulos;Irina Zaretskaya

  • Quantitative in vivo MRI measurement of cortical development in the fetus.

    Cédric Clouchoux;Cédric Clouchoux;Dimitri Kudelski;Ali Gholipour;Simon K. Warfield

  • Third Trimester Brain Growth in Preterm Infants Compared With In Utero Healthy Fetuses

    Marine Bouyssi-Kobar;Adré J. du Plessis;Robert McCarter;Marie Brossard-Racine

  • Normative fetal brain growth by quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance imaging.

    Cedric Clouchoux;Cedric Clouchoux;Nicolas Guizard;Alan Charles Evans;Adre Jacques du Plessis

  • Cerebral hemodynamic changes during intensive care of preterm infants.

    Catherine Limperopoulos;Kimberlee K. Gauvreau;Heather O'Leary;Marianne Moore

  • Complex Trajectories of Brain Development in the Healthy Human Fetus

    Nickie N. Andescavage;Adre du Plessis;Robert McCarter;Ahmed Serag

  • Periventricular hemorrhagic infarction : Risk factors and neonatal outcome

    Haim Bassan;Henry A. Feldman;Catherine Limperopoulos;Carol B. Benson

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan C. Evans
Alan C. Evans McGill University
Annette Majnemer
Annette Majnemer McGill University
Simon K. Warfield
Simon K. Warfield Boston Children's Hospital
Ali Gholipour
Ali Gholipour Harvard University
Doff B. McElhinney
Doff B. McElhinney Stanford University
Eugen Boltshauser
Eugen Boltshauser University of Zurich
Michael Shevell
Michael Shevell McGill University
Jane W. Newburger
Jane W. Newburger Boston Children's Hospital
James C. Gee
James C. Gee University of Pennsylvania
David Zurakowski
David Zurakowski Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, a variety of online degrees and career pathways can help expand your knowledge and job opportunities. Many students find that combining neuroscience with counseling or psychology can lead to rewarding roles in mental health, therapy, or research.

For those interested in counseling, exploring the best online cacrep counseling programs can open doors to becoming a licensed professional counselor. Similarly, advancing your expertise with online masters counseling programs offers additional flexibility and diverse career options.

Individuals drawn to family dynamics and therapy might consider accredited mft masters programs. Those who wish to broaden their psychological understanding should look into affordable online masters in psychology—an excellent choice for blending neuroscience with the principles of behavioral science.

Each of these degree pathways can complement a neuroscience background and prepare you for a career in healthcare, education, research, or clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Limperopoulos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles