World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
41850
World Ranking
7610
National Ranking
3963

Edward D. Frohlich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward D. Frohlich sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 718 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edward D. Frohlich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward D. Frohlich sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward D. Frohlich was affiliated with Ochsner Health System in the United States. Their professional work contributed to the medical and health sciences community through clinical and research activities associated with this institution.

No specific details are available regarding their topics of work, main fields, or subfields of study. There are also no records of frequent co-authors or recurring publication venues linked to their research output.

There is no data on published papers including titles, years of publication, or publication venues. Similarly, there are no records of books published by the scientist through any known publishers.

The available information does not list any awards or honors received by Edward D. Frohlich.

As of now, Edward D. Frohlich is recognized as deceased, with no specified date of passing.

Best Publications

  • Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry.

    D Perloff;C Grim;J Flack;E D Frohlich

  • Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update

    James R. Sowers;Murray Epstein;Edward D. Frohlich

  • The 1988 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure

    Aram V. Chobanian;Michael H. Alderman;Vincent DeQuattro;Edward D. Frohlich

  • The heart in hypertension.

    Edward D. Frohlich;Carl Apstein;Aram V. Chobanian;Richard B. Devereux

  • The 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure

    Robert M. Carey;Jeffrey Cutler;William Friedewald;Norman Gant

  • Hypertension and sudden death: Increased ventricular ectopic activity in left ventricular hypertrophy☆

    Franz H. Messerli;Hector O. Ventura;David J. Elizardi;Francis G. Dunn

  • Serum Uric Acid in Essential Hypertension: An Indicator of Renal Vascular Involvement

    Franz H. Messerli;Edward D. Frohlich;Gerald R. Dreslinski;Daniel H. Suarez

  • Obesity and suppressed B-type natriuretic peptide levels in heart failure

    Mandeep R Mehra;Patricia A Uber;Myung H Park;Robert L Scott

  • Insulin and insulin resistance:: impact on blood pressure and cardiovascular disease

    James R Sowers;James R Sowers;Edward D Frohlich

  • Sodium, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Disease Further Evidence Supporting the American Heart Association Sodium Reduction Recommendations

    Paul K. Whelton;Lawrence J. Appel;Ralph L. Sacco;Cheryl A.M. Anderson

  • The Importance of Population-Wide Sodium Reduction as a Means to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke A Call to Action From the American Heart Association

    Lawrence J. Appel;Edward D. Frohlich;John E. Hall;Thomas A. Pearson

  • Dimorphic Cardiac Adaptation to Obesity and Arterial Hypertension

    Franz H. Messerli;Kirsten Sundgaard-Riise;Efrain D. Reisin;Gerald R. Dreslinski

  • The Effect of Treatment on Mortality in Mild Hypertension: Results of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program

    Elbert Tuttle;Vickie Grimes;Aristide Apostolidcs;J. Richard Hebel

  • Obesity and Essential Hypertension: Hemodynamics, Intravascular Volume, Sodium Excretion, and Plasma Renin Activity

    Franz H. Messerli;Barbara Christie;Jose G. R. DeCarvalho;Gerardo G. Aristimuno

  • Salt in Health and Disease — A Delicate Balance

    Theodore A. Kotchen;Allen W. Cowley;Edward D. Frohlich

  • Pathophysiologic assessment of hypertensive heart disease with echocardiography

    Francis G. Dunn;Premindra Chandraratna;Jose G.R. deCarvalho;Lotfy L. Basta

  • Is arterial pressure the sole factor responsible for hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy

    Edward D. Frohlich;Robert C. Tarazi

  • Essential hypertension in the elderly: Haemodynamics, intravascular volume, plasma renin activity, and circulating catecholamine levels

    FranzH. Messerli;HectorO. Ventura;LouisB. Glade;Kirsten Sundgaard-Riise

  • Cardiovascular Changes After Weight Reduction in Obesity Hypertension

    Efrain Reisin;Edward D. Frohlich;Franz H. Messerli;Gerald R. Dreslinski

  • The Paradox of Beta-Adrenergic Blockade in Hypertension

    Edward D. Frohlich;Robert C. Tarazi;Harriet P. Dustan;Irvine H. Page

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz H. Messerli
Franz H. Messerli University of Bern
Hector O. Ventura
Hector O. Ventura University of Queensland
Robert C. Tarazi
Robert C. Tarazi Cleveland Clinic
L. Gabriel Navar
L. Gabriel Navar Tulane University
Paul Muntner
Paul Muntner University of Alabama at Birmingham
Marc A. Pfeffer
Marc A. Pfeffer Harvard Medical School
Roland E. Schmieder
Roland E. Schmieder University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Larry S. Webber
Larry S. Webber Tulane University
Javier Díez
Javier Díez University of Navarra
Paul K. Whelton
Paul K. Whelton Tulane University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine and healthcare, online degrees are offering new avenues for career advancement. Many nursing professionals are looking for programs that fit their busy schedules without sacrificing quality. One popular option is the rn to bsn without clinicals, which allows registered nurses to earn a bachelor's degree fully online, often with greater flexibility and less time away from work.

Aspiring to graduate-level nursing? The shortest online dnp program helps experienced nurses quickly gain the highest practical nursing credential and move into advanced practice or leadership roles. Some students also benefit from online dnp programs without clinicals, which reduce on-site requirements and make doctoral study more accessible for working nurses.

If you're new to healthcare or want to start your career quickly, a lpn fast track program can help you become a licensed practical nurse in less time through online coursework. These flexible pathways allow learners at different stages of their careers to find programs that best suit their needs and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Edward D. Frohlich

Recently Published Articles