World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
56
Citations
116504
World Ranking
712
National Ranking
354

David W. Hosmer publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Hosmer sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 112 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David W. Hosmer D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Hosmer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. Hosmer is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Statistics and Probability, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Several recent publications illustrate the focus of their work. These include:

  • Current patterns of trauma center proliferation have not led to proportionate improvements in access to care or mortality after injury: An ecologic study, 2023, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
  • Geographic Coverage and Verification of Trauma Centers in a Rural State: Highlighting the Utility of Location Allocation for Trauma System Planning, 2020, Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • Frequency and Predictors of Trauma Transfer Futility to a Rural Level I Trauma Center, 2022, Journal of Surgical Research
  • Characterising attrition from childhood to adulthood in a 20-year cohort: which baseline factors are influential, and can bias be corrected?, 2020, Longitudinal and Life Course Studies
  • Refinements on the exact method to solve the numerical difficulties in fitting the log binomial regression model for estimating relative risk, 2023, Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods

Their publications appear repeatedly in key venues such as:

  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
  • Journal of Surgical Research
  • Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods
  • Longitudinal and Life Course Studies

Frequent collaborators of David W. Hosmer include:

  • Turner Osler
  • Stas Amato
  • Jamie Benson
  • Ajai K. Malhotra
  • Gary An

David W. Hosmer's work is interdisciplinary, bridging clinical trauma research with methodological advances in statistics. Their contributions span empirical studies on trauma system performance, rural healthcare accessibility, trauma transfer efficacy, and statistical modeling techniques relevant to clinical research.

Best Publications

  • Applied Logistic Regression

    David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemeshow

  • Applied Logistic Regression: Hosmer/Applied Logistic Regression

    Unknown

  • Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data

    David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemeshow;Susanne May

  • Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression

    Zoran Bursac;C Heath Gauss;David Keith Williams;David W Hosmer

  • Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model

    David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemesbow

  • A REVIEW OF GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS

    Stanley Lemeshow;David W. Hosmer

  • A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model.

    D. W. Hosmer;T. Hosmer;S. Le Cessie;S. Lemeshow

  • Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data

    Unknown

  • Confidence interval estimation of interaction.

    David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemeshow

  • Applied Logistic Regression.

    Steven L. Gortmaker;David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemeshow

  • Best subsets logistic regression

    David W. Hosmer;Borko Jovanovic;Stanley Lemeshow

  • Model‐Building Strategies and Methods for Logistic Regression

    David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemeshow

  • The importance of assessing the fit of logistic regression models: a case study.

    D W Hosmer;S Taber;S Lemeshow

  • Adequacy of Sample Size in Health Studies.

    S. A. Ogston;S. Lemeshow;D. W. Hosmer;J. Klar

  • Assessing the Fit of the Model

    David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemeshow;Rodney X. Sturdivant

  • Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries: extending and updating the baux score.

    Turner Osler;Laurent G. Glance;David W. Hosmer

  • Increasing the efficacy of physician-delivered smoking interventions. A randomized clinical trial

    Judith K. Ockene;Jean L. Kristeller;Robert J. Goldberg;Terrence L. Amick

  • Relationship of weight, height, and body mass index with fracture risk at different sites in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

    Juliet E. Compston;Julie M. Flahive;David W. Hosmer Jr.;Nelson B. Watts

  • Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using a complex sampling design

    Kellie J. Archer;Stanley Lemeshow;David W. Hosmer

  • Confidence intervals for measures of interaction.

    Susan F. Assmann;David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemeshow;Kenneth A. Mundt

  • Smoking cessation and severity of disease: the Coronary Artery Smoking Intervention Study

    Judith K. Ockene;Jean L. Kristeller;Robert J. Goldberg;Ira S. Ockene

  • Introduction to the Logistic Regression Model

    David W. Hosmer;Stanley Lemeshow;Rodney X. Sturdivant

  • Applied Logistic Regression.

    A. J. Scott;D. W. Hosmer;S. Lemeshow

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Goldberg
Robert J. Goldberg University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Judith K. Ockene
Judith K. Ockene University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Frederick A. Anderson
Frederick A. Anderson University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Andrea Z. LaCroix
Andrea Z. LaCroix University of California, San Diego
Adolfo Diez-Perez
Adolfo Diez-Perez Autonomous University of Barcelona
Kenneth G. Saag
Kenneth G. Saag University of Alabama at Birmingham
James E. Dalen
James E. Dalen University of Arizona
Ira S. Ockene
Ira S. Ockene University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Roland Chapurlat
Roland Chapurlat Claude Bernard University Lyon 1

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to numerous specialized online degrees and career options. For those interested in the application of math in technology and business, pursuing a data analytics master's degree can be a strategic move. This degree blends mathematical modeling with real-world data analysis, preparing graduates for roles in finance, healthcare, and tech industries.

Alternatively, some students may consider diversifying their skillset with business-focused education. Many wonder, what MBA programs can I get into? There are plenty of accessible options catering to various academic backgrounds and professional goals.

For those seeking flexibility, exploring an easy online MBA can provide a convenient pathway to leadership roles without disrupting current employment. Online formats have simplified balancing work, study, and personal commitments.

Moreover, experienced professionals might be interested in advancing their careers with a doctorate. Investigating the DBA programs online offers a practical route for those aiming to specialize in data-driven decision-making and strategic business leadership.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Hosmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles