World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 79 3602 1165 165 22764

David G. Myszka publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David G. Myszka between 1990 and 2015, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David G. Myszka published across 26 years, from 1990 to 2015, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2002. 4 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2015. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2002. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications
1990 2015

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David G. Myszka: publications per year, 1990 to 2015
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 4
1995 2
1996 7
1997 5
1998 6
1999 3
2000 12
2001 12
2002 16
2003 11
2004 9
2005 11
2006 14
2007 7
2008 11
2009 14
2010 11
2011 6
2012 5
2013 4
2014 2
2015 2
Total 177
Download as CSV

David G. Myszka publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Myszka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 165 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350 165
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

David G. Myszka D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Myszka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388 79
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David G. Myszka is a researcher affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their work includes contributions to the field of molecular recognition as reflected in recent publications.

Among their recent papers is a 2020 publication titled "Issue Information" in the Journal of Molecular Recognition. This paper is listed with a citation count of zero, indicating it is a recent or niche contribution within this specific journal.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David G. Myszka include:

  • Marc Van Regenmortel
  • Ruben Abagyan
  • Richard Ansell
  • Dominic W. Berry
  • Christina R. Bourne

The primary publication venue for their work is the Journal of Molecular Recognition, with at least one documented publication in this journal.

Best Publications

  • Improving biosensor analysis.

    David G. Myszka

  • Advances in surface plasmon resonance biosensor analysis.

    Rebecca L Rich;David G Myszka

  • Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors

    David G Myszka

  • Survey of the year 2003 commercial optical biosensor literature

    Rebecca L. Rich;David G. Myszka

  • Structural basis of caspase inhibition by XIAP: differential roles of the linker versus the BIR domain.

    Yihua Huang;Young Chul Park;Rebecca L. Rich;Deena Segal

  • The PHD Finger of the Chromatin-Associated Protein ING2 Functions as a Nuclear Phosphoinositide Receptor

    Or Gozani;Philip Karuman;David R. Jones;Dmitri Ivanov

  • Energetics of the HIV gp120-CD4 binding reaction

    David G. Myszka;Raymond W. Sweet;Preston Hensley;Michael Brigham-Burke

  • Extending the Range of Rate Constants Available from BIACORE: Interpreting Mass Transport-Influenced Binding Data

    David G. Myszka;Xiaoyi He;Micah Dembo;Thomas A. Morton

  • Interpreting complex binding kinetics from optical biosensors: a comparison of analysis by linearization, the integrated rate equation, and numerical integration.

    T.A. Morton;D.G. Myszka;I.M. Chaiken

  • G-Protein Signaling Through Tubby Proteins

    Sandro Santagata;Titus J. Boggon;Cheryl L. Baird;Carlos A. Gomez

  • Analyzing a kinetic titration series using affinity biosensors

    Robert Karlsson;Phinikoula S. Katsamba;Helena Nordin;Ewa Pol

  • Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors.

    Thomas A. Morton;David G. Myszka

  • E2 interaction and dimerization in the crystal structure of TRAF6

    Qian Yin;Su Chang Lin;Betty Lamothe;Miao Lu

  • Structure and functional interactions of the Tsg101 UEV domain

    Owen Pornillos;Steven L. Alam;Rebecca L. Rich;David G. Myszka

  • Molecular recognition in the HIV-1 capsid/cyclophilin A complex.

    Sanghee Yoo;David G. Myszka;Chin yah Yeh;Maureen McMurray

  • Direct comparison of binding equilibrium, thermodynamic, and rate constants determined by surface‐ and solution‐based biophysical methods

    Yasmina S.N. Day;Cheryl L. Baird;Rebecca L. Rich;David G. Myszka

  • High-resolution and high-throughput protocols for measuring drug/human serum albumin interactions using BIACORE.

    Rebecca L. Rich;Yasmina S.N. Day;Thomas A. Morton;David G. Myszka

  • Higher-throughput, label-free, real-time molecular interaction analysis

    Rebecca L. Rich;David G. Myszka

  • Kinetic analysis of a protein antigen-antibody interaction limited by mass transport on an optical biosensor.

    David G. Myszka;Thomas A. Morton;Michael L. Doyle;Irwin M. Chaiken

  • CLAMP©: a biosensor kinetic data analysis program

    David G Myszka;Thomas A Morton

  • CCR5 is a receptor for Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED

    Francis Alonzo;Lina Kozhaya;Stephen A. Rawlings;Tamara Reyes-Robles

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce K. Gale
Bruce K. Gale University of Utah
Irwin M. Chaiken
Irwin M. Chaiken Drexel University
Hao Wu
Hao Wu Harvard University
Thomas A. Morton
Thomas A. Morton University of Copenhagen
Wesley I. Sundquist
Wesley I. Sundquist University of Utah
Christopher P. Hill
Christopher P. Hill University of Utah
Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health
Daniel A. Kirschner
Daniel A. Kirschner Boston College
Edward Rockenstein
Edward Rockenstein University of California, San Diego
Joseph Sodroski
Joseph Sodroski Harvard Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens numerous doors, especially in forensic science and related fields. Many students explore online forensic science courses to gain specialized knowledge that complements their chemistry background. These programs often provide flexible and affordable options for advancing technical skills.

For those interested in deeper psychological aspects of criminal investigations, enrolling in an online masters forensic psychology program can enhance career prospects. This interdisciplinary approach marries chemistry with behavioral science, opening roles beyond traditional lab work.

Career opportunities stemming from these educational paths vary widely. Positions such as autopsy technician offer meaningful work with a focus on medical investigations. Understanding the autopsy tech salary helps aspiring professionals evaluate their options realistically.

More broadly, a forensic science degree can lead to lucrative roles across law enforcement and private sectors. Reviewing the forensic science degree salary landscape assists students in making informed decisions about their career pathways in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing David G. Myszka

Recently Published Articles