World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
22764
World Ranking
3602
National Ranking
1165

David G. Myszka publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Myszka sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 165 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

David G. Myszka D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Myszka sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

David G. Myszka is a researcher affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their work includes contributions to the field of molecular recognition as reflected in recent publications.

Among their recent papers is a 2020 publication titled "Issue Information" in the Journal of Molecular Recognition. This paper is listed with a citation count of zero, indicating it is a recent or niche contribution within this specific journal.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David G. Myszka include:

  • Marc Van Regenmortel
  • Ruben Abagyan
  • Richard Ansell
  • Dominic W. Berry
  • Christina R. Bourne

The primary publication venue for their work is the Journal of Molecular Recognition, with at least one documented publication in this journal.

Best Publications

  • Improving biosensor analysis.

    David G. Myszka

  • Advances in surface plasmon resonance biosensor analysis.

    Rebecca L Rich;David G Myszka

  • Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors

    David G Myszka

  • Survey of the year 2003 commercial optical biosensor literature

    Rebecca L. Rich;David G. Myszka

  • Structural basis of caspase inhibition by XIAP: differential roles of the linker versus the BIR domain.

    Yihua Huang;Young Chul Park;Rebecca L. Rich;Deena Segal

  • The PHD Finger of the Chromatin-Associated Protein ING2 Functions as a Nuclear Phosphoinositide Receptor

    Or Gozani;Philip Karuman;David R. Jones;Dmitri Ivanov

  • Energetics of the HIV gp120-CD4 binding reaction

    David G. Myszka;Raymond W. Sweet;Preston Hensley;Michael Brigham-Burke

  • Extending the Range of Rate Constants Available from BIACORE: Interpreting Mass Transport-Influenced Binding Data

    David G. Myszka;Xiaoyi He;Micah Dembo;Thomas A. Morton

  • Interpreting complex binding kinetics from optical biosensors: a comparison of analysis by linearization, the integrated rate equation, and numerical integration.

    T.A. Morton;D.G. Myszka;I.M. Chaiken

  • G-Protein Signaling Through Tubby Proteins

    Sandro Santagata;Titus J. Boggon;Cheryl L. Baird;Carlos A. Gomez

  • Analyzing a kinetic titration series using affinity biosensors

    Robert Karlsson;Phinikoula S. Katsamba;Helena Nordin;Ewa Pol

  • Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors.

    Thomas A. Morton;David G. Myszka

  • E2 interaction and dimerization in the crystal structure of TRAF6

    Qian Yin;Su Chang Lin;Betty Lamothe;Miao Lu

  • Structure and functional interactions of the Tsg101 UEV domain

    Owen Pornillos;Steven L. Alam;Rebecca L. Rich;David G. Myszka

  • Molecular recognition in the HIV-1 capsid/cyclophilin A complex.

    Sanghee Yoo;David G. Myszka;Chin yah Yeh;Maureen McMurray

  • Direct comparison of binding equilibrium, thermodynamic, and rate constants determined by surface‐ and solution‐based biophysical methods

    Yasmina S.N. Day;Cheryl L. Baird;Rebecca L. Rich;David G. Myszka

  • High-resolution and high-throughput protocols for measuring drug/human serum albumin interactions using BIACORE.

    Rebecca L. Rich;Yasmina S.N. Day;Thomas A. Morton;David G. Myszka

  • Higher-throughput, label-free, real-time molecular interaction analysis

    Rebecca L. Rich;David G. Myszka

  • Kinetic analysis of a protein antigen-antibody interaction limited by mass transport on an optical biosensor.

    David G. Myszka;Thomas A. Morton;Michael L. Doyle;Irwin M. Chaiken

  • CLAMP©: a biosensor kinetic data analysis program

    David G Myszka;Thomas A Morton

  • CCR5 is a receptor for Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED

    Francis Alonzo;Lina Kozhaya;Stephen A. Rawlings;Tamara Reyes-Robles

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce K. Gale
Bruce K. Gale University of Utah
Irwin M. Chaiken
Irwin M. Chaiken Drexel University
Hao Wu
Hao Wu Harvard University
Thomas A. Morton
Thomas A. Morton University of Copenhagen
Wesley I. Sundquist
Wesley I. Sundquist University of Utah
Christopher P. Hill
Christopher P. Hill University of Utah
Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health
Daniel A. Kirschner
Daniel A. Kirschner Boston College
Edward Rockenstein
Edward Rockenstein University of California, San Diego
Joseph Sodroski
Joseph Sodroski Harvard Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens numerous doors, especially in forensic science and related fields. Many students explore online forensic science courses to gain specialized knowledge that complements their chemistry background. These programs often provide flexible and affordable options for advancing technical skills.

For those interested in deeper psychological aspects of criminal investigations, enrolling in an online masters forensic psychology program can enhance career prospects. This interdisciplinary approach marries chemistry with behavioral science, opening roles beyond traditional lab work.

Career opportunities stemming from these educational paths vary widely. Positions such as autopsy technician offer meaningful work with a focus on medical investigations. Understanding the autopsy tech salary helps aspiring professionals evaluate their options realistically.

More broadly, a forensic science degree can lead to lucrative roles across law enforcement and private sectors. Reviewing the forensic science degree salary landscape assists students in making informed decisions about their career pathways in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing David G. Myszka