World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
8315
World Ranking
9373
National Ranking
4962

David E. Orlinsky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Orlinsky sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David E. Orlinsky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Orlinsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Orlinsky is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and contributes primarily to the field of psychology, with a focus on clinical and social psychology. Their scholarly work encompasses 13 publications, exploring areas related to psychotherapy techniques, counseling practices, and psychological well-being.

Their research covers several key topics, including:

  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Psychiatric Care and Mental Health Services
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health, Psychology, and Well-being
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment

David E. Orlinsky's publications often appear in venues such as Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Frontiers in Psychology, Counselling Psychology Quarterly, and Psychotherapy Research. Notable papers authored or co-authored include:

  • "Ninety psychotherapy training programmes across the globe: Variations and commonalities in an international context," 2023, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
  • "Psychotherapist Trainees' Quality of Life: Patterns and Correlates," 2022, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "The emotionally burdened psychotherapist: Personal and situational risk factors," 2021, Professional Psychology Research and Practice
  • "Exploring influences of supervision on psychotherapists' professional development: correlates across career-level cohorts," 2024, Counselling Psychology Quarterly
  • "Measuring psychotherapist functioning with the Therapist Work Involvement Scales (TWIS): reliability, factor structure, and measurement invariance," 2024, Psychotherapy Research

Frequent collaborators in their work include Michael Helge Rønnestad, Armin Hartmann, Ulrike Willutzki, Erkki Heinonen, and Irene Messina. These partnerships reflect a consistent engagement with colleagues who contribute to research around psychotherapy and mental health education.

Orlinsky's research is positioned primarily within clinical and social psychology, also incorporating applied psychology, occupational therapy, and general health professions. This multidisciplinary approach underlines an interest in both the practical and theoretical dimensions of psychotherapy training and clinician well-being.

Best Publications

  • The dose–effect relationship in psychotherapy.

    K I Howard;S M Kopta;M S Krause;D E Orlinsky

  • How Psychotherapists Develop: A Study of Therapeutic Work and Professional Growth

    David E. Orlinsky;Michael Helge Rønnestad

  • Process and outcome in psychotherapy: Noch einmal.

    David E. Orlinsky;Klaus Grawe;Barbara K. Parks

  • Empirically supported therapy relationships: Conclusions and recommendations fo the Division 29 Task Force.

    Steven J. Ackerman;Lorna Smith Benjamin;Larry E. Beutler;Charles J. Gelso

  • Development of Psychotherapists: Concepts, Questions, and Methods of a Collaborative International Study

    David Orlinsky;Hansruedi Ambühl;M. Rønnestad;John Davis

  • A generic model of psychotherapy.

    David E. Orlinsky;Kenneth I. Howard

  • The Therapeutic Bond Scales: Psychometric Characteristics and Relationship to Treatment Effectiveness

    Stephen M. Saunders;Kenneth I. Howard;David E. Orlinsky

  • Towards an empirically grounded model of psychotherapy training: Four thousand therapists rate influences on their development

    David E. Orlinsky;Jean François Botermans;M. Helge Rønnestad

  • Utilization of personal therapy by psychotherapists: a practice-friendly review and a new study.

    David E. Orlinsky;Margot J. Schofield;Thomas Schroder;Nikolaos Kazantzis

  • PSYCHOTHERAPISTS' ASSESSMENTS OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT AT DIFFERENT CAREER LEVELS

    David Orlinsky;M. Helge Rønnestad;Hansruedi Ambühl;Ulrike Willutzki

  • The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy.

    Unknown

  • The attrition dilemma: toward a new strategy for psychotherapy research.

    Kenneth I. Howard;Merton S. Krause;David E. Orlinsky

  • The psychological interior of psychotherapy: Explorations with the Therapy Session Reports.

    David E. Orlinsky;Kenneth I. Howard

  • The psychotherapist's own psychotherapy : patient and clinician perspectives

    Jesse D. Geller;John C. Norcross;David E. Orlinsky

  • The “Generic Model of Psychotherapy” after 25 years: Evolution of a research-based metatheory.

    David E. Orlinsky

  • The Good Therapy Hour: Experiential Correlates of Patients' and Therapists' Evaluations of Therapy Sessions

    David E. Orlinsky;Kenneth I. Howard

  • The professional development of counsellors and psychotherapists: Implications of empirical studies for supervision, training and practice

    Michael Helge Rønnestad;David E. Orlinsky;Thomas A. Schröder;Thomas M. Skovholt

  • Varieties of psychotherapeutic experience : multivariate analyses of patients' and therapists' reports

    David E. Orlinsky;Kenneth Irwin Howard

  • Psychotherapists' personal identities, theoretical orientations, and professional relationships: elective affinity and role adjustment as modes of congruence.

    Erkki Heinonen;David Elliot Orlinsky

  • Clinically relevant outcome research in individual psychotherapy. New models guide the researcher and clinician.

    Kenneth I. Howard;David E. Orlinsky;Robert J. Lueger

  • The attrition dilemma: Toward a new strategy for psychotherapy research.

    Unknown

  • Patients' satisfactions in psychotherapy as a function of patient-therapist pairing.

    Kenneth I. Howard;David E. Orlinsky;James A. Hill

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth I. Howard
Kenneth I. Howard Northwestern University
Almut Zeeck
Almut Zeeck University of Freiburg
John C. Norcross
John C. Norcross University of Scranton
Nikolaos Kazantzis
Nikolaos Kazantzis Monash University
Kevin R. Ronan
Kevin R. Ronan Central Queensland University
Larry E. Beutler
Larry E. Beutler University of California, Santa Barbara
Stephan Herpertz
Stephan Herpertz Ruhr University Bochum
Stephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel University of Tübingen
Barry A. Farber
Barry A. Farber Columbia University
Allen E. Bergin
Allen E. Bergin Brigham Young University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A psychology degree opens doors to a range of online degrees and career pathways, especially in social work, counseling, and mental health. Many students explore online programs that allow for flexible scheduling and specialized training in these fields.

If you’re interested in social work, it’s important to note that education requirements can vary by state. For example, you can review the Oregon education requirements for social workers to understand what degrees and credentials are necessary for practice there. Each state has its own standards, such as the social worker education requirements in Pennsylvania, which outline the degrees needed at both the bachelor’s and master’s levels.

Similarly, you’ll find differences in the Rhode Island education requirements for social workers and the social worker education requirements in South Carolina. Understanding these state-specific pathways can help you choose the right online program to meet your career goals. Whether pursuing licensure or entry-level roles, online degrees provide a flexible route to these rewarding professions.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Orlinsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles