World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
48
Citations
15985
World Ranking
4383
National Ranking
379

Daniela M. Ferreira publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela M. Ferreira sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 186 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Daniela M. Ferreira D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela M. Ferreira sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK.

    M Voysey;Clemens Sac.;S A Madhi;L Y Weckx

  • Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials.

    M Voysey;S A Costa Clemens;S A Madhi;L Y Weckx

  • Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

    Shuo Feng;Daniel J. Phillips;Thomas White;Homesh Sayal

  • Streptococcus pneumoniae: transmission, colonization and invasion

    Jeffrey N. Weiser;Daniela M. Ferreira;James C. Paton

  • Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

    Katherine R W Emary;Tanya Golubchik;Parvinder K Aley;Cristina V Ariani

  • Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous versus homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Com-COV): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

    Xinxue Liu;Robert H Shaw;Arabella S V Stuart;Melanie Greenland

  • Pneumolysin Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome and Promotes Proinflammatory Cytokines Independently of TLR4

    Edel A. McNeela;Áine Burke;Daniel R. Neill;Cathy Baxter

  • Immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of heterologous COVID-19 primary vaccination incorporating mRNA, viral-vector, and protein-adjuvant vaccines in the UK (Com-COV2): a single-blind, randomised, phase 2, non-inferiority trial

    Unknown

  • Reactogenicity and immunogenicity after a late second dose or a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in the UK: a substudy of two randomised controlled trials (COV001 and COV002).

    Amy Flaxman;Natalie G Marchevsky;Daniel Jenkin;Jeremy Aboagye

  • Controlled Human Infection and Rechallenge with Streptococcus pneumoniae Reveals the Protective Efficacy of Carriage in Healthy Adults

    Daniela M. Ferreira;Daniel R. Neill;Mathieu Bangert;Jenna F. Gritzfeld

  • Inflammation induced by influenza virus impairs human innate immune control of pneumococcus

    Simon P. Jochems;Fernando Marcon;Beatriz F. Carniel;Mark Holloway

  • Experimental infection of human volunteers

    Meta Roestenberg;Marie-Astrid Hoogerwerf;Daniela M Ferreira;Benjamin Mordmüller

  • Characterization of Protective Mucosal and Systemic Immune Responses Elicited by Pneumococcal Surface Protein PspA and PspC Nasal Vaccines against a Respiratory Pneumococcal Challenge in Mice

    D. M. Ferreira;M. Darrieux;D. A. Silva;L. C. C. Leite

  • Human alveolar macrophages predominately express combined classical M1 and M2 surface markers in steady state.

    Unknown

  • Human leukocyte antigen alleles associate with COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity and risk of breakthrough infection

    Unknown

  • T regulatory cells control susceptibility to invasive pneumococcal pneumonia in mice.

    Daniel R. Neill;Vitor E. Fernandes;Laura Wisby;Andrew R. Haynes

  • Fusion proteins containing family 1 and family 2 PspA fragments elicit protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae that correlates with antibody-mediated enhancement of complement deposition.

    M. Darrieux;E. N. Miyaji;D. M. Ferreira;L. M. Lopes

  • Experimental Human Pneumococcal Carriage Augments IL-17A-dependent T-cell Defence of the Lung

    Adam K. A. Wright;Mathieu Bangert;Jenna F. Gritzfeld;Daniela M. Ferreira

  • The immunising effect of pneumococcal nasopharyngeal colonisation; protection against future colonisation and fatal invasive disease

    Luke Richards;Daniela M. Ferreira;Eliane N. Miyaji;Peter W. Andrew

  • Immunization of mice with single PspA fragments induces antibodies capable of mediating complement deposition on different pneumococcal strains and cross-protection.

    Adriana T. Moreno;Maria Leonor S. Oliveira;Daniela M. Ferreira;Paulo L. Ho

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen B. Gordon
Stephen B. Gordon Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Aras Kadioglu
Aras Kadioglu University of Liverpool
Robert S. Heyderman
Robert S. Heyderman University College London
Debby Bogaert
Debby Bogaert University of Edinburgh
Saul N. Faust
Saul N. Faust University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Melita A. Gordon
Melita A. Gordon University of Liverpool
Neil French
Neil French University of Liverpool
Teresa Lambe
Teresa Lambe University of Oxford
Adam Finn
Adam Finn University of Bristol
David Goldblatt
David Goldblatt University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniela M. Ferreira