World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
12552
World Ranking
4877
National Ranking
408

Clemens Sommer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clemens Sommer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Clemens Sommer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clemens Sommer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Regulatory T cells are key cerebroprotective immunomodulators in acute experimental stroke

    Arthur Liesz;Elisabeth Suri-Payer;Claudia Veltkamp;Henrike Doerr

  • The hematopoietic factor G-CSF is a neuronal ligand that counteracts programmed cell death and drives neurogenesis

    Armin Schneider;Carola Krüger;Tobias Steigleder;Tobias Steigleder;Tobias Steigleder;Daniela Weber

  • Ischemic stroke: experimental models and reality

    Clemens J. Sommer

  • Neuroprotective effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after focal cerebral ischemia.

    W.-R. Schäbitz;R. Kollmar;M. Schwaninger;E. Juettler

  • Intravenous Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Enhances Poststroke Sensorimotor Recovery and Stimulates Neurogenesis

    Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz;Tobias Steigleder;Christiana M. Cooper-Kuhn;Stefan Schwab

  • Intravenous Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Reduces Infarct Size and Counterregulates Bax and Bcl-2 Expression After Temporary Focal Cerebral Ischemia

    Wolf-R. Schäbitz;Clemens Sommer;Werner Zoder;Marika Kiessling

  • Inhibition of lymphocyte trafficking shields the brain against deleterious neuroinflammation after stroke.

    Arthur Liesz;Wei Zhou;Éva Mracskó;Simone Karcher

  • Effect of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Treatment and Forced Arm Use on Functional Motor Recovery After Small Cortical Ischemia

    W.-R. Schäbitz;C. Berger;R. Kollmar;M. Seitz

  • Effect of global system for mobile communication (GSM) microwave exposure on blood-brain barrier permeability in rat

    K. Fritze;C. Sommer;B. Schmitz;G. Mies

  • Restricted diffusion within ring enhancement is not pathognomonic for brain abscess.

    Marius Hartmann;Olav Jansen;Sabine Heiland;Clemens Sommer

  • Effect of global system for mobile communication microwave exposure on the genomic response of the rat brain

    K Fritze;C Wiessner;N Kuster;C Sommer

  • A neuroprotective function for the hematopoietic protein granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

    Wolf Rüdiger Schäbitz;Carola Krüger;Claudia Pitzer;Daniela Weber

  • Neuroprotection by hyperbaric oxygenation after experimental focal cerebral ischemia monitored by MRI.

    Wolf-Ruediger Schäbitz;Holger Schade;Sabine Heiland;Rainer Kollmar

  • Molecularly defined diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) comprises two subgroups with distinct clinical and genetic features.

    Maximilian Y. Deng;Martin Sill;Jason Chiang;Jens Schittenhelm

  • Visualizing cell death in experimental focal cerebral ischemia: promises, problems, and perspectives

    Marietta Zille;Tracy D Farr;Ingo Przesdzing;Jochen Müller

  • Severe forward flexion of the trunk in Parkinson's disease: focal myopathy of the paraspinal muscles mimicking camptocormia.

    Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz;Katharina Glatz;Christian Schuhan;Clemens Sommer

  • Delayed Neuroprotective Effect of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I After Experimental Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia Monitored With MRI

    Wolf-R. Schäbitz;Tobias T. Hoffmann;Sabine Heiland;Rainer Kollmar

  • Selective c-JUN Expression in CA1 Neurons of the Gerbil Hippocampus during and after Acquisition of an Ischemia-Tolerant State

    Clemens Sommer;Peter Gass;Marika Kiessling

  • Differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioma in humans using localised proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

    Inga Harting;Marius Hartmann;Gregor Jost;Clemens Sommer

  • Postischemic brain infiltration of leukocyte subpopulations differs among murine permanent and transient focal cerebral ischemia models.

    Wei Zhou;Arthur Liesz;Henrike Bauer;Clemens Sommer

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Schwab
Stefan Schwab University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Torsten Pietsch
Torsten Pietsch University of Bonn
Peter Gass
Peter Gass Heidelberg University
Joab Chapman
Joab Chapman Tel Aviv University
Andrey Korshunov
Andrey Korshunov German Cancer Research Center
Stefan M. Pfister
Stefan M. Pfister German Cancer Research Center
Andreas von Deimling
Andreas von Deimling Heidelberg University
Roland Veltkamp
Roland Veltkamp Imperial College London
Joachim Weis
Joachim Weis RWTH Aachen University
Andrea Schmitt
Andrea Schmitt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in neuroscience, it’s useful to explore related online degree options and pathways. Many students choose to complement their neuroscience studies with advanced degrees in counseling, psychology, or social work—all fields with strong online education offerings.

For those interested in combining neuroscience with social work, 1 year msw programs online no bsw can provide a fast track to advanced roles, even if you don’t have a bachelor’s in social work. If you want to dive quickly into human behavior or health sciences, an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online can be a smart, time-efficient choice.

Those interested in mental health counseling should consider a cacrep-accredited program to ensure their degree meets professional licensure standards. If affordability is a key consideration as you plan your career path, the cheapest master's in counseling online options are worth exploring.

Selecting the right online program can help neuroscience graduates pursue diverse careers in research, therapy, counseling, or healthcare—without compromising on accreditation, speed, or cost.

Best Scientists Citing Clemens Sommer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles