World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 33 6992 6492 3398 3097 57 13306

Christopher Taber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher Taber between 1994 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher Taber published across 30 years, from 1994 to 2023, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 2005. 4 of the 60 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 2005. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication
1994 2023

60 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher Taber: publications per year, 1994 to 2023
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 4
1999 2
2000 4
2001 3
2002 4
2003 0
2004 2
2005 5
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 2
2010 2
2011 4
2012 2
2013 0
2014 0
2015 2
2016 2
2017 3
2018 1
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
2022 3
2023 1
Total 60
Download as CSV

Christopher Taber publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher Taber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 54–63 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61 57
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher Taber D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher Taber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188 33
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Christopher Taber is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields within economics, econometrics, and social sciences, with a focus on understanding labor markets, demographic factors, and economic modeling.

Their research topics include:

  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Economic theories and models

Christopher Taber has contributed to various subfields, notably:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • General Health Professions
  • Demography
  • Gender Studies
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Several publication venues have featured their work, including:

  • Econometrica
  • Journal of Political Economy
  • Journal of Applied Econometrics
  • Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
  • Journal of Labor Economics

Christopher Taber's recent papers cover diverse aspects of labor economics and econometric modeling. These include:

  • "Estimation of a Roy/Search/Compensating Differential Model of the Labor Market," 2020, Econometrica
  • "Estimation of a Life-Cycle Model with Human Capital, Labor Supply, and Retirement," 2023, Journal of Political Economy
  • "Understanding women's wage growth using indirect inference with importance sampling," 2021, Journal of Applied Econometrics
  • "Thoughts on 'Transparency in Structural Research'," 2020, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
  • "Introduction: A Special Issue in Honor of Joseph Altonji," 2020, Journal of Labor Economics

Their research collaborations involve frequent coauthors such as:

  • Ananth Seshadri
  • Xiaodong Fan
  • Rune Vejlin
  • Robert M. Sauer

Best Publications

  • Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools

    Joseph G. Altonji;Todd E. Elder;Christopher R. Taber

  • Explaining Rising Wage Inequality: Explorations with a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of Labor Earnings with Heterogeneous Agents

    James Heckman;Lance Lochner;Christopher Taber

  • General-Equilibrium Treatment Effects: A Study of Tuition Policy

    James J. Heckman;Lance Lochner;Christopher Taber

  • Estimation of educational borrowing constraints using returns to schooling

    Stephen V. Cameron;Christopher Taber

  • Inference with “Difference in Differences” with a Small Number of Policy Changes

    Timothy G. Conley;Christopher R. Taber

  • An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schooling

    Joseph G. Altonji;Todd E. Elder;Christopher R. Taber

  • Tax Policy and Human-Capital Formation

    James J Heckman;Lance Lochner;Christopher Taber

  • Estimating the Effect of Student Aid on College Enrollment: Evidence from a Government Grant Policy Reform

    Helena Skyt Nielsen;Torben Sørensen;Christopher R Taber

  • The Rising College Premium in the Eighties: Return to College or Return to Unobserved Ability?

    Christopher R. Taber

  • Wage Progression Among Less Skilled Workers

    Tricia Lynn Gladden;Christopher R. Taber

  • General Equilibrium Cost Benefit Analysis of Education and Tax Policies

    James Heckman;Lance Lochner;Christopher Taber

  • What Do Bureaucrats Do? The Effects of Performance Standards and Bureaucratic Preferences on Acceptance into the JTPA Program

    James Heckman;Jeffrey Smith;Christopher Taber

  • Using Selection on Observed Variables to Assess Bias from Unobservables When Evaluating Swan-Ganz Catheterization

    Joseph G. Altonji;Todd E. Elder;Christopher R. Taber

  • Borrowing Constraints and the Returns to Schooling

    Stephen Cameron;Christopher Taber

  • Accounting for Dropouts in Evaluations of Social Programs

    James Heckman;Jeffrey Smith;Christopher Taber

  • Estimating the Cream Skimming Effect of School Choice

    Joseph G. Altonji;Ching-I Huang;Christopher R. Taber

  • Difference-in-Differences Method in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Utility with Unbalanced Groups

    Huanxue Zhou;Christopher Taber;Steve Arcona;Yunfeng Li

  • Life-Cycle Wage Growth and Heterogeneous Human Capital

    Carl Sanders;Christopher Taber;Christopher Taber

  • Identification of Models of the Labor Market

    Eric French;Christopher Taber

  • Estimation of a Roy/Search/Compensating Differential Model of the Labor Market

    Christopher Taber;Rune Vejlin

  • Estimating the Effect of Student Aid on College Enrollment: Evidence from a Government Grant Policy Reform

    Helena Skyt Nielsen;Helena Skyt Nielsen;Torben Soerensen;Christopher Taber;Christopher Taber

  • The Rising College Premium in the Eighties: Return to College or Return to Unobserved Ability?: Return to College or Return to Unobserved Ability?

    Christopher R. Taber

Frequent Co-Authors

James J. Heckman
James J. Heckman University of Chicago
Joseph G. Altonji
Joseph G. Altonji Yale University
Lance Lochner
Lance Lochner University of Western Ontario
Hidehiko Ichimura
Hidehiko Ichimura University of Tokyo
Helena Skyt Nielsen
Helena Skyt Nielsen Aarhus University
Eric French
Eric French University of Cambridge
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bhashkar Mazumder
Bhashkar Mazumder University of California, Irvine
Francis Kramarz
Francis Kramarz Collège de France
Steven N. Durlauf
Steven N. Durlauf University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and career pathways. Students seeking a quick entry into high-demand fields may consider the accelerated masters in social work programs, which fast-track your journey toward impactful social work roles.

For those interested in human behavior and mental health, accelerated psychology programs online can help you complete your degree more quickly, preparing you for roles in counseling, research, or therapy.

If your goal is professional counseling, consider enrolling in cacrep accredited online counseling programs. These programs meet strict standards and are widely recognized, enhancing your credentials for licensure.

Additionally, students interested in supporting couples and families can explore online mft programs accredited for marriage and family therapy careers. These pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and direct alignment with real-world career opportunities in mental health and community services.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher Taber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles