World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 47 4826 4448 415 395 68 7090

Chris I. Gallimore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chris I. Gallimore between 1993 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chris I. Gallimore published across 24 years, from 1993 to 2016, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2004. 1 of the 69 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2004. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
1993 2016

69 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chris I. Gallimore: publications per year, 1993 to 2016
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 2
2003 8
2004 10
2005 4
2006 5
2007 5
2008 5
2009 5
2010 4
2011 1
2012 1
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
Total 69
Download as CSV

Chris I. Gallimore publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris I. Gallimore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 65–74 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 68 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29 68
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Chris I. Gallimore D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris I. Gallimore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110 47
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Chris I. Gallimore is affiliated with Public Health England in the United Kingdom. Their professional activities are centered within the public health sector, contributing to national efforts in health protection and disease prevention.

Their research profile does not list specific publications, frequent co-authors, or specialized publication venues at this time. There are also no recorded book publications or detailed main and subfields of study publicly associated with their name.

While there is limited publicly available bibliometric data on Chris I. Gallimore's scholarly output, their institutional affiliation indicates involvement in health-related research activities aligned with the priorities of a national public health agency.

Aspects such as main topics of work, awards, and collaborative networks have not been documented. This absence of detailed metadata limits a comprehensive view of their research trajectory and focus areas.

Further information could expand understanding of their academic and scientific contributions within the broader public health landscape.

Best Publications

  • Increase in viral gastroenteritis outbreaks in Europe and epidemic spread of new norovirus variant

    Ben Lopman;Harry Vennema;Evelyne Kohli;Pierre Pothier

  • Widespread environmental contamination with Norwalk-like viruses (NLV) detected in a prolonged hotel outbreak of gastroenteritis.

    J. S. Cheesbrough;J. Green;C. I. Gallimore;P. A. Wright

  • Genetic polymorphism across regions of the three open reading frames of "Norwalk-like viruses".

    J. Vinjé;J. Green;D. C. Lewis;C. I. Gallimore

  • Broadly reactive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of SRSV-associated gastroenteritis

    J. Green;C. I. Gallimore;J. P. Norcott;D. Lewis

  • The role of environmental contamination with small round structured viruses in a hospital outbreak investigated by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay

    J. Green;P.A. Wright;C.I. Gallimore;O. Mitchell

  • An outbreak of viral gastroenteritis following environmental contamination at a concert hall.

    Meirion Rhys Evans;R. Meldrum;W. Lane;D. Gardner

  • Molecular Characterization of Bovine Enteric Caliciviruses: a Distinct Third Genogroup of Noroviruses (Norwalk-Like Viruses) Unlikely To Be of Risk to Humans

    S L Oliver;A M Dastjerdi;S Wong;L M R El-Attar

  • Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Norovirus Gastroenteritis: A Previously Unrecognized Cause of Morbidity

    C. Roddie;J. P.V. Paul;R. Benjamin;Christopher Gallimore

  • A nested reverse transcriptase PCR assay for detection of small round-structured viruses in environmentally contaminated molluscan shellfish.

    J. Green;K. Henshilwood;C. I. Gallimore;D. W. G. Brown

  • Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for detecting Norwalk-like virus antigen in faeces.

    Alison F. Richards;Ben A. Lopman;Annabel Gunn;Alan Curry

  • Quantitation of group A rotavirus by real-time reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction: correlation with clinical severity in children in South India.

    Gagandeep Kang;Miren Iturriza-Gomara;Jeremy G. Wheeler;Premila Crystal

  • Analysis of Amino Acid Variation in the P2 Domain of the GII-4 Norovirus VP1 Protein Reveals Putative Variant-Specific Epitopes

    David J. Allen;David J. Allen;Jim J. Gray;Christopher Gallimore;Jacqueline Xerry

  • Temperature inactivation of Feline calicivirus vaccine strain FCV F-9 in comparison with human noroviruses using an RNA exposure assay and reverse transcribed quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction—A novel method for predicting virus infectivity

    J R Topping;H Schnerr;J Haines;M Scott

  • Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Excretion of Noroviruses during a Hospital Outbreak of Gastroenteritis

    Chris I. Gallimore;David Cubitt;Nelita du Plessis;Jim J. Gray

  • Mixed genogroup SRSV infections among a party of canoeists exposed to contaminated recreational water.

    J. J. Gray;J. Green;C. Cunliffe;C. Gallimore

  • Environmental Monitoring for Gastroenteric Viruses in a Pediatric Primary Immunodeficiency Unit

    Christopher Gallimore;Clive Taylor;Andrew R. Gennery;Andrew J. Cant

  • Human caliciviruses in symptomatic and asymptomatic infections in children in Vellore, South India.

    Bindhu Monica;Sasirekha Ramani;Indrani Banerjee;Beryl Primrose

  • Capsid protein diversity among Norwalk-like viruses.

    Jonathan Green;Jan Vinje;Chris I. Gallimore;Marion Koopmans

  • The Bovine Newbury Agent-2 Is Genetically More Closely Related to Human SRSVs Than to Animal Caliciviruses

    A.M. Dastjerdi;J. Green;C.I. Gallimore;D.W.G. Brown

  • European multicenter evaluation of commercial enzyme immunoassays for detecting norovirus antigen in fecal samples.

    Jim J Gray;Evelyne Kohli;Franco M Ruggeri;Harry Vennema

  • Inter-seasonal diversity of norovirus genotypes: Emergence and selection of virus variants

    Christopher Gallimore;Miren Iturriza-Go'Mara;Jacqueline Xerry;J. Adigwe

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim Gray
Jim Gray Government of the United Kingdom
David Brown
David Brown Government of the United Kingdom
Miren Iturriza-Gomara
Miren Iturriza-Gomara University of Liverpool
Gagandeep Kang
Gagandeep Kang Christian Medical College & Hospital
Andrew R. Gennery
Andrew R. Gennery Newcastle University
Andrew J. Cant
Andrew J. Cant Newcastle University
Marion Koopmans
Marion Koopmans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan Vinjé
Jan Vinjé Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Harry Vennema
Harry Vennema Centre for infectious Disease Control (Cib)
Pierre Pothier
Pierre Pothier University of Burgundy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to various online educational opportunities and career options. Students interested in healthcare may find online healthcare programs particularly appealing, as they offer flexible pathways to medical-related fields without the need to attend campus full-time.

For those looking to expand their knowledge in public health, there are many accredited online MPH programs easy to get into. These programs provide foundational skills applicable to microbiology-related careers in epidemiology or community health, making them accessible options for degree advancement.

Some graduates choose specialized roles like becoming a Child Life Specialist. Understanding job prospects and earning potential is important, so reviewing resources such as child.life specialist salary can offer insights into what to expect salary-wise in this meaningful profession.

Additionally, individuals with a criminal record who want to pursue higher education will find guidance through resources like what is the best degree for a convicted felon. This helps identify accessible degree programs, including some in microbiology and healthcare, fostering career growth despite past challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Chris I. Gallimore

Recently Published Articles