World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 106 1032 982 625 590 381 85881
Materials Science 107 771 735 262 240 360 88115
Chemistry 108 859 759 341 272 345 88013

Catherine J. Murphy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Catherine J. Murphy between 1962 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Catherine J. Murphy published across 65 years, from 1962 to 2026, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 12 of the 414 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1962 2026

414 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Catherine J. Murphy: publications per year, 1962 to 2026
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 6
1991 2
1992 0
1993 3
1994 1
1995 3
1996 6
1997 2
1998 4
1999 13
2000 7
2001 18
2002 15
2003 11
2004 11
2005 21
2006 15
2007 9
2008 14
2009 12
2010 5
2011 18
2012 16
2013 26
2014 21
2015 20
2016 20
2017 22
2018 16
2019 12
2020 10
2021 11
2022 12
2023 13
2024 5
2025 11
2026 1
Total 414
Download as CSV

Catherine J. Murphy publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine J. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 50–69 to 1,163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 891. Most scientists, 891, have 190–209 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 350–369 publications, is where this scientist sits. 50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50–69 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 360 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
50–69 28
70–89 152
90–109 356
110–129 487
130–149 723
150–169 835
170–189 850
190–209 891
210–229 862
230–249 766
250–269 726
270–289 665
290–309 593
310–329 537
330–349 477
350–369 440 360
370–389 356
390–409 321
410–429 256
430–449 246
450–469 216
470–489 212
490–509 174
510–529 194
530–549 162
550–569 131
570–589 111
590–609 103
610–629 99
630–649 77
650–669 92
670–689 56
690–709 53
710–729 53
730–749 38
750–769 52
770–789 43
790–809 38
810–829 34
830–849 25
850–869 18
870–889 20
890–909 24
910–929 27
930–949 20
950–969 17
970–989 10
990–1,009 16
1,010–1,029 13
1,030–1,049 12
1,050–1,069 9
1,070–1,089 8
1,090–1,109 7
1,110–1,129 9
1,130–1,149 2
1,150–1,162 5
1,163+ 100
Download as CSV

Catherine J. Murphy D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine J. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 165+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 667. Most scientists, 667, have 52–53 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 211
42–43 450
44–45 612
46–47 612
48–49 598
50–51 657
52–53 667
54–55 621
56–57 597
58–59 610
60–61 587
62–63 606
64–65 533
66–67 490
68–69 469
70–71 378
72–73 421
74–75 359
76–77 323
78–79 299
80–81 230
82–83 210
84–85 195
86–87 203
88–89 175
90–91 175
92–93 142
94–95 121
96–97 117
98–99 107
100–101 88
102–103 85
104–105 68
106–107 62 107
108–109 57
110–111 45
112–113 49
114–115 50
116–117 34
118–119 38
120–121 37
122–123 29
124–125 28
126–127 24
128–129 33
130–131 28
132–133 21
134–135 20
136–137 23
138–139 17
140–141 12
142–143 17
144–145 21
146–147 13
148–149 11
150–151 14
152–153 13
154–155 9
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 4
162–163 4
164 3
165+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2015 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Catherine J. Murphy is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their primary research focus lies within the field of Materials Science, with contributions spanning 63 publications. Subfields of study include Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, and Biomaterials.

Their research covers a range of topics, notably in the synthesis and applications of nanoparticles. Key areas of work include:

  • Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
  • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
  • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Polymer Surface Interaction Studies

Their recent papers reflect a focus on nanomaterials and their interactions, as well as advances in materials chemistry and biomedical applications. Selected publications include:

  • "Multicolor polymeric carbon dots: synthesis, separation and polyamide-supported molecular fluorescence," 2020, Chemical Science
  • "Opportunities for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Enabled by Surface Ligands," 2022, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus definitions for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) terminology," 2023, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • "Effect of surface ligands on gold nanocatalysts for CO2 reduction," 2020, Chemical Science
  • "Anionic nanoparticle-induced perturbation to phospholipid membranes affects ion channel function," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their scholarly work include Vincent M. Rotello, Bin Liu, Peter J. Stang, Paul S. Weiss, and Cynthia J. Burrows, each listed with similar co-authorship counts within the data.

Their publications often appear in venues such as ACS Nano, Langmuir, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Chemical Science, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The most frequent are:

  • ACS Nano
  • Langmuir
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Chemical Science
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Catherine J. Murphy has received recognition including election as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015 and as a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2019.

Best Publications

  • The Optical Properties of Metal Nanoparticles: The Influence of Size, Shape, and Dielectric Environment

    K. Lance Kelly;Eduardo A. Coronado;Lin-lin Zhao;George C Schatz

  • The golden age: gold nanoparticles for biomedicine

    Erik C. Dreaden;Alaaldin M. Alkilany;Xiaohua Huang;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Anisotropic metal nanoparticles: Synthesis, assembly, and optical applications

    Catherine J. Murphy;Tapan K. Sau;Anand M. Gole;Christopher J. Orendorff

  • Wet Chemical Synthesis of High Aspect Ratio Cylindrical Gold Nanorods

    Nikhil R. Jana;Latha Gearheart;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Gold Nanoparticles Are Taken Up by Human Cells but Do Not Cause Acute Cytotoxicity

    Ellen E. Connor;Judith Mwamuka;Anand Gole;Catherine Jones Murphy

  • Seed‐Mediated Growth Approach for Shape‐Controlled Synthesis of Spheroidal and Rod‐like Gold Nanoparticles Using a Surfactant Template

    N. R. Jana;L. Gearheart;C. J. Murphy

  • GOLD NANOPARTICLES IN BIOLOGY: BEYOND TOXICITY TO CELLULAR IMAGING

    Catherine J. Murphy;Anand M. Gole;John W. Stone;Patrick N. Sisco

  • Room temperature, high-yield synthesis of multiple shapes of gold nanoparticles in aqueous solution.

    Tapan K. Sau;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: what we have learned so far?

    Alaaldin M. Alkilany;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Seeding Growth for Size Control of 5−40 nm Diameter Gold Nanoparticles

    Nikhil R. Jana;and Latha Gearheart;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Seeded high yield synthesis of short Au nanorods in aqueous solution.

    Tapan K. Sau;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Wet chemical synthesis of silver nanorods and nanowiresof controllable aspect ratio

    Nikhil R. Jana;Latha Gearheart;Catherine J. Murphy

  • CONTROLLING THE ASPECT RATIO OF INORGANIC NANORODS AND NANOWIRES

    Catherine J. Murphy;Nikhil R. Jana

  • Long-range photoinduced electron transfer through a DNA helix

    C. J. Murphy;M. R. Arkin;Y. Jenkins;N. D. Ghatlia

  • Seed-Mediated Synthesis of Gold Nanorods: Role of the Size and Nature of the Seed

    Anand Gole and;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects.

    Alaaldin M. Alkilany;Pratik K. Nagaria;Cole R. Hexel;Timothy J. Shaw

  • Growth and form of gold nanorods prepared by seed-mediated, surfactant-directed synthesis

    Christopher J. Johnson;Erik Dujardin;Sean A. Davis;Catherine J. Murphy

  • An Improved Synthesis of High‐Aspect‐Ratio Gold Nanorods

    Brantley D. Busbee;Sherine O. Obare;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Recent Progress in Cancer Thermal Therapy Using Gold Nanoparticles

    Nardine S. Abadeer;Catherine J. Murphy

  • Quantitation of Metal Content in the Silver-Assisted Growth of Gold Nanorods

    Christopher J. Orendorff;Catherine Jones Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

George C. Schatz
George C. Schatz Northwestern University
Anne B. McCoy
Anne B. McCoy University of Washington
Robert J. Hamers
Robert J. Hamers University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sharon Hammes-Schiffer
Sharon Hammes-Schiffer Yale University
Nikhil R. Jana
Nikhil R. Jana Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
Robert S. Coleman
Robert S. Coleman The Ohio State University
Christy L. Haynes
Christy L. Haynes University of Minnesota
Franz M. Geiger
Franz M. Geiger Northwestern University
Rohit Bhargava
Rohit Bhargava University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David G. Cahill
David G. Cahill University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Catherine J. Murphy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles