World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
12884
World Ranking
7553
National Ranking
2681

Benjamin Z. Houlton publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Z. Houlton sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Benjamin Z. Houlton D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Z. Houlton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin Z. Houlton is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on Soil Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics, including soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, peatlands and wetlands ecology, soil and water nutrient dynamics, methane hydrates and related phenomena, microbial community ecology and physiology, CO2 sequestration and geologic interactions, and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics.

Frequent coauthors in their collaborations include Ying-Ping Wang, Feng Tao, Yiqi Luo, Serita D. Frey, and Lifen Jiang.

Benjamin Z. Houlton has published extensively in several venues, with notable numbers in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Ecology, Global Change Biology, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Nature.

Recent publications by the scientist include:

  • Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage, 2023, Nature
  • Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • Fertilizer management for global ammonia emission reduction, 2024, Nature
  • Size, distribution, and vulnerability of the global soil inorganic carbon, 2024, Science
  • Policy-enabled stabilization of nitrous oxide emissions from livestock production in China over 1978-2017, 2022, Nature Food

Best Publications

  • Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions

    Peter M. Vitousek;Stephen Porder;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Oliver A. Chadwick

  • A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere

    Benjamin Z. Houlton;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Ying-Ping Wang;Peter M. Vitousek;Christopher B. Field

  • Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems.

    Alison R. Marklein;Benjamin Z. Houlton

  • Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage

    Unknown

  • Relationships among net primary productivity, nutrients and climate in tropical rain forest: a pan‐tropical analysis

    Cory C. Cleveland;Alan R. Townsend;Philip Taylor;Silvia Alvarez-Clare

  • Patterns of new versus recycled primary production in the terrestrial biosphere

    Cory C. Cleveland;Benjamin Z. Houlton;W. Kolby Smith;Alison R. Marklein

  • Isotopic evidence for large gaseous nitrogen losses from tropical rainforests

    Benjamin Z. Houlton;Daniel M. Sigman;Lars O. Hedin

  • Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature

    Mark Lynas;Benjamin Z Houlton;Simon Perry

  • A model of biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus including symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphatase production

    Y.-P. Wang;B. Z. Houlton;B. Z. Houlton;C. B. Field

  • Responses and feedbacks of coupled biogeochemical cycles to climate change: examples from terrestrial ecosystems

    Adrien C Finzi;Amy T Austin;Elsa E Cleland;Serita D Frey

  • A climate-driven switch in plant nitrogen acquisition within tropical forest communities

    Benjamin Z. Houlton;Daniel M. Sigman;Edward A. G. Schuur;Lars O. Hedin

  • Multi-element regulation of the tropical forest carbon cycle

    Alan R. Townsend;Cory C. Cleveland;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Caroline B. Alden

  • Triple Oxygen Isotope Analysis of Nitrate Using the Denitrifier Method and Thermal Decomposition of N2O

    Jan Kaiser;Meredith G. Hastings;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Thomas Röckmann

  • Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California

    Pawlok Dass;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Yingping Wang;David Warlind

  • Convergent evidence for widespread rock nitrogen sources in Earth's surface environment.

    Benjamin Houlton;S. L. Morford;Randy A. Dahlgren

  • Microbial denitrification dominates nitrate losses from forest ecosystems

    Yunting Fang;Keisuke Koba;Akiko Makabe;Chieko Takahashi

  • Agriculture is a major source of NO x pollution in California.

    Maya Almaraz;Edith Bai;Edith Bai;Chao Wang;Justin Trousdell

  • Imprint of denitrifying bacteria on the global terrestrial biosphere

    Benjamin Z. Houlton;Edith Bai

  • Increased forest ecosystem carbon and nitrogen storage from nitrogen rich bedrock

    Scott L. Morford;Benjamin Z. Houlton;Randy A. Dahlgren

  • A world of cobenefits: solving the global nitrogen challenge.

    Benjamin Z. Houlton;Maya Almaraz;Viney Aneja;Amy Theresa Austin

  • Nitrogen constraints on terrestrial carbon uptake: implications for the global carbon-climate feedback.

    Ying-Ping Wang;Benjamin Z. Houlton

Frequent Co-Authors

Edith Bai
Edith Bai Chinese Academy of Sciences
Ying-Ping Wang
Ying-Ping Wang Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Randy A. Dahlgren
Randy A. Dahlgren University of California, Davis
Chao Wang
Chao Wang University of Southern California
Alan R. Townsend
Alan R. Townsend University of Montana
Christopher B. Field
Christopher B. Field Stanford University
Peter M. Vitousek
Peter M. Vitousek Stanford University
Daniel M. Sigman
Daniel M. Sigman Princeton University
James N. Galloway
James N. Galloway University of Virginia
Lars O. Hedin
Lars O. Hedin Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways. Many professionals choose to advance their education through specialized programs. For educators and environmental policymakers, online eds to edd programs offer a convenient path to doctoral qualifications, enhancing leadership opportunities in environmental education and research.

Social work intersects significantly with environmental justice. Programs like fully funded dsw programs online provide a way to engage in community advocacy and policy development to address environmental health disparities.

For students seeking flexibility, most affordable online general studies degree programs blend various disciplines, including environmental science, to create well-rounded skill sets that are highly valued in interdisciplinary fields.

Lastly, for individuals balancing work or other commitments, selecting from the easiest degree to get online programs can provide a manageable route to completing foundational studies before specializing further.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Z. Houlton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles