World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Benjamin Schrauwen

Benjamin Schrauwen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 52 4970 4833 53 49 187 16845

Benjamin Schrauwen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benjamin Schrauwen between 2003 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benjamin Schrauwen published across 16 years, from 2003 to 2018, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2012. 2 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2012. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications
2003 2018

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benjamin Schrauwen: publications per year, 2003 to 2018
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 4
2005 10
2006 7
2007 11
2008 21
2009 12
2010 21
2011 14
2012 34
2013 29
2014 20
2015 2
2016 3
2017 0
2018 2
Total 191
Download as CSV

Benjamin Schrauwen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Schrauwen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 182–191 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 187 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583 187
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Benjamin Schrauwen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Schrauwen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 52
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Benjamin Schrauwen is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on computer science and medicine. Schrauwen's work integrates domains such as artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, psychiatry and mental health, and information systems.

Their research topics cover a range of areas including EEG and brain-computer interfaces, ECG monitoring and analysis, epilepsy research and treatment, evolutionary algorithms and applications, advanced text analysis techniques, and software engineering research.

Schrauwen has contributed to several publications, mainly appearing in the Ghent University Academic Bibliography. Recent papers include:

  • Dynamic Stopping in a Calibration-less P300 Speller, 2020, Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
  • Transferring Unsupervised Adaptive Classifiers Between Users Of A Spatial Auditory Brain-Computer Interface, 2020, Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
  • Switching Characters Between Stimuli Improves P300 Speller Accuracy, 2020, Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)

Their frequent collaborators comprise Pieter-Jan Kindermans, with whom Schrauwen has co-authored three papers. Other collaborators include Benjamin Blankertz, Klaus-Robert Müller, Michael Tangermann, and Thibault Verhoeven.

Overall, Schrauwen's body of research concentrates on the development and improvement of brain-computer interface technology, signal processing methods related to EEG and ECG data, as well as aspects of evolutionary algorithms and software engineering applied to biomedical contexts.

Best Publications

  • Information processing using a single dynamical node as complex system

    L Appeltant;M C Soriano;G Van der Sande;J Danckaert

  • 2007 Special Issue: An experimental unification of reservoir computing methods

    D. Verstraeten;B. Schrauwen;M. D'Haene;D. Stroobandt

  • Deep content-based music recommendation

    Aaron van den Oord;Sander Dieleman;Benjamin Schrauwen

  • Optoelectronic reservoir computing.

    Yvan Paquot;Francois Duport;Antoneo Smerieri;Joni Dambre

  • Experimental demonstration of reservoir computing on a silicon photonics chip

    Kristof Vandoorne;Pauline Mechet;Thomas Van Vaerenbergh;Martin Fiers

  • Training and Analysing Deep Recurrent Neural Networks

    Michiel Hermans;Benjamin Schrauwen

  • Sign Language Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Networks

    Lionel Pigou;Sander Dieleman;Pieter-Jan Kindermans;Benjamin Schrauwen

  • An overview of reservoir computing: theory, applications and implementations

    Benjamin Schrauwen;David Verstraeten;Jan M. Van Campenhout

  • End-to-end learning for music audio

    Sander Dieleman;Benjamin Schrauwen

  • Information Processing Capacity of Dynamical Systems

    Joni Dambre;David Verstraeten;Benjamin Schrauwen;Serge Massar

  • Reservoir Computing Trends

    Mantas Lukoševičius;Herbert Jaeger;Benjamin Schrauwen

  • Isolated word recognition with the liquid state machine : a case study

    D. Verstraeten;B. Schrauwen;D. Stroobandt;J. Van Campenhout

  • Design and control of compliant tensegrity robots through simulation and hardware validation.

    Ken Caluwaerts;Ken Caluwaerts;Jérémie Despraz;Atıl Işçen;Andrew P. Sabelhaus

  • Toward optical signal processing using photonic reservoir computing.

    Kristof Vandoorne;Wouter Dierckx;Benjamin Schrauwen;David Verstraeten

  • Improving reservoirs using intrinsic plasticity

    Benjamin Schrauwen;Marion Wardermann;David Verstraeten;Jochen J. Steil

  • Parallel Reservoir Computing Using Optical Amplifiers

    K. Vandoorne;J. Dambre;D. Verstraeten;B. Schrauwen

  • Connectivity, dynamics, and memory in reservoir computing with binary and analog neurons

    Lars Büsing;Benjamin Schrauwen;Robert Legenstein

  • Using topic models for Twitter hashtag recommendation

    Fréderic Godin;Viktor Slavkovikj;Wesley De Neve;Benjamin Schrauwen

  • Phoneme Recognition with Large Hierarchical Reservoirs

    Fabian Triefenbach;Azarakhsh Jalalvand;Benjamin Schrauwen;Jean-pierre Martens

  • BSA, a fast and accurate spike train encoding scheme

    B. Schrauwen;J. Van Campenhout

Frequent Co-Authors

Joni Dambre
Joni Dambre Ghent University
Peter Bienstman
Peter Bienstman Ghent University
Serge Massar
Serge Massar Université Libre de Bruxelles
Marc Haelterman
Marc Haelterman Université Libre de Bruxelles
Aaron van den Oord
Aaron van den Oord Google (United States)
Geert Morthier
Geert Morthier Ghent University
Klaus-Robert Müller
Klaus-Robert Müller Technical University of Berlin
Jochen J. Steil
Jochen J. Steil Technische Universität Braunschweig
Claudio R. Mirasso
Claudio R. Mirasso University of the Balearic Islands
Auke Jan Ijspeert
Auke Jan Ijspeert École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of connected disciplines and career options. Many students look for flexible and affordable pathways, and online degrees are becoming more popular every year.

For those interested in engineering, pursuing an online degree for mechanical engineering offers a path into fields like robotics and product design. If you’re passionate about the sciences, an online physics bachelor's degree blends theoretical knowledge with technical skills that complement computer science.

Data science is another attractive and growing field. If you’re interested in analytics and big data, an affordable data science degree can lead to careers in business intelligence, machine learning, and engineering. Additionally, technology-focused options such as the best online electrical engineering programs USA provide knowledge that is highly valuable in computer hardware and systems design.

No matter your interests, these online degree programs offer flexible, cost-effective routes to rewarding tech careers that align well with a background in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Schrauwen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles