World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 39 9456 9183 4000 3833 63 29043

Aaron van den Oord publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aaron van den Oord between 2001 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aaron van den Oord published across 24 years, from 2001 to 2024, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2018. 2 of the 68 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2018. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
2001 2024

68 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aaron van den Oord: publications per year, 2001 to 2024
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 2
2013 2
2014 3
2015 2
2016 5
2017 9
2018 13
2019 13
2020 3
2021 13
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
Total 68
Download as CSV

Aaron van den Oord publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron van den Oord sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 62–71 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 63 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134 63
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Aaron van den Oord D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron van den Oord sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 39
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Aaron van den Oord is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of computer science, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence, signal processing, and computer vision and pattern recognition. The scientist's work includes publications in various subfields related to audio and speech processing and machine learning applications.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Aaron van den Oord include:

  • "Are we done with ImageNet?", 2020, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Divide and Contrast: Self-supervised Learning from Uncurated Data", 2021, presented at the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • "Towards Learning Universal Audio Representations", 2022, at ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
  • "Efficient Visual Pretraining with Contrastive Detection", 2021, presented at the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • "Multi-Format Contrastive Learning of Audio Representations", 2021, published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors in their body of work include:

  • Luyu Wang
  • Jean-Baptiste Alayrac
  • Olivier J. Hénaff
  • Pauline Luc
  • Adrià Recasens

Aaron van den Oord's publications frequently appear in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

Best Publications

  • Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding

    Aaron van den Oord;Yazhe Li;Oriol Vinyals

  • WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio

    Aäron van den Oord;Sander Dieleman;Heiga Zen;Karen Simonyan

  • Neural Discrete Representation Learning

    Aaron van den Oord;Oriol Vinyals;koray kavukcuoglu

  • Conditional image generation with PixelCNN decoders

    Aäron van den Oord;Nal Kalchbrenner;Oriol Vinyals;Lasse Espeholt

  • Pixel recurrent neural networks

    Aäron Van Den Oord;Nal Kalchbrenner;Koray Kavukcuoglu

  • Deep content-based music recommendation

    Aaron van den Oord;Sander Dieleman;Benjamin Schrauwen

  • Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Coding

    Olivier J. Hénaff;Aravind Srinivas;Jeffrey De Fauw;Ali Razavi

  • A note on the evaluation of generative models

    Lucas Theis;Aäron van den Oord;Matthias Bethge

  • Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2

    Ali Razavi;Aaron van den Oord;Oriol Vinyals

  • Parallel WaveNet: Fast High-Fidelity Speech Synthesis

    Aäron van den Oord;Yazhe Li;Igor Babuschkin;Karen Simonyan

  • Neural Machine Translation in Linear Time

    Nal Kalchbrenner;Lasse Espeholt;Karen Simonyan;Aäron van den Oord

  • Efficient Neural Audio Synthesis

    Nal Kalchbrenner;Erich Elsen;Karen Simonyan;Seb Noury

  • Count-based exploration with neural density models

    Georg Ostrovski;Marc G. Bellemare;Aäron van den Oord;Rémi Munos

  • Adversarial Risk and the Dangers of Evaluating Against Weak Attacks.

    Jonathan Uesato;Brendan O'Donoghue;Aaron van den Oord;Pushmeet Kohli

  • On Variational Bounds of Mutual Information

    Ben Poole;Sherjil Ozair;Aaron van den Oord;Alexander A. Alemi

  • Unsupervised Speech Representation Learning Using WaveNet Autoencoders

    Jan Chorowski;Ron J. Weiss;Samy Bengio;Aaron van den Oord

  • Video Pixel Networks

    Nal Kalchbrenner;Aäron van den Oord;Karen Simonyan;Ivo Danihelka

  • Beyond Temporal Pooling: Recurrence and Temporal Convolutions for Gesture Recognition in Video

    Lionel Pigou;Aäron van den Oord;Sander Dieleman;Mieke Van Herreweghe

  • Parallel Multiscale Autoregressive Density Estimation.

    Scott E. Reed;Aäron van den Oord;Nal Kalchbrenner;Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo

  • Are we done with ImageNet

    Lucas Beyer;Olivier J. Hénaff;Alexander Kolesnikov;Xiaohua Zhai

  • Parallel Multiscale Autoregressive Density Estimation

    Scott Reed;Aäron van den Oord;Nal Kalchbrenner;Sergio Gómez Colmenarejo

Frequent Co-Authors

Oriol Vinyals
Oriol Vinyals DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Nal Kalchbrenner
Nal Kalchbrenner Google (United States)
Karen Simonyan
Karen Simonyan DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Koray Kavukcuoglu
Koray Kavukcuoglu DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Alex Graves
Alex Graves Google (United States)
Nando de Freitas
Nando de Freitas DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Benjamin Schrauwen
Benjamin Schrauwen Ghent University
Heiga Zen
Heiga Zen Google (United States)
Danilo Jimenez Rezende
Danilo Jimenez Rezende DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Ben Poole
Ben Poole Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a future in Computer Science, it’s important to explore related degrees and flexible learning options. Affordability often tops students’ priorities, and those interested in data analysis can look into the cheapest data science degree programs in the USA for budget-friendly alternatives.

For students leaning toward engineering, earning an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering provides foundational skills highly valued in tech and industry. If you’re looking to enter the workforce quickly, consider easy certifications to get online that offer strong earning potential with a lower investment of time and money.

Many professionals also look for rapid career advancement with graduate studies. Busy schedules make pursuing quick masters degrees online an appealing choice for expansive knowledge and better job prospects without significant delays.

With these flexible pathways, you can tailor your education to fit your academic interests, timeline, and budget—setting a solid foundation for a dynamic tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron van den Oord

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles